Back to AI Flashcard MakerPsychology /2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology Memory: Factors Effecting The Accuracy Of Eyewitness Testimony Part 1
2023-2025 Year 12 A-Level Psychology Memory: Factors Effecting The Accuracy Of Eyewitness Testimony Part 1
This deck covers key concepts related to factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony, including misleading information and anxiety, as well as specific studies and findings related to these factors.
What are 2 factors affecting eyewitness testimony?
1. Misleading information 2. Anxiety
Tap or swipe ↕ to flip
Swipe ←→Navigate
1/24
Key Terms
Term
Definition
What are 2 factors affecting eyewitness testimony?
1. Misleading information 2. Anxiety
What are 2 examples of “misleading information”?
1. Leading questions 2. Post-event discussion
Leading questions is an example of what factor affecting EWT?
Misleading information
Post-event discussion is an example of what factor affecting EWT?
Misleading information
What is a ‘leading question’
A question that wrongly implies something about an event
“A question which wrongly implies something about an event” is referring to…
Leading questions
Related Flashcard Decks
Study Tips
- Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
- Review cards regularly to improve retention
- Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
- Share this deck with friends to study together
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
What are 2 factors affecting eyewitness testimony? | 1. Misleading information 2. Anxiety |
What are 2 examples of “misleading information”? | 1. Leading questions 2. Post-event discussion |
Leading questions is an example of what factor affecting EWT? | Misleading information |
Post-event discussion is an example of what factor affecting EWT? | Misleading information |
What is a ‘leading question’ | A question that wrongly implies something about an event |
“A question which wrongly implies something about an event” is referring to… | Leading questions |
Who investigated the effect of leading questions on the accuracy of EWT? | Loftus + Palmer |
Loftus + Palmer investigated which factor affecting the accuracy of EWT? | Leading questions |
What method did Loftus + Palmer use to study leading questions? | Lab experiment |
What was the aim of Loftus + Palmer’s experiment? | To investigate how the phrasing of a question can affect participants memory of an event |
Name all of the verbs used in Loftus + Palmers experiment | Smashed; Hit; Collided; Bumped; Contacted |
How many verbs were used in Loftus + Palmers experiment? | 5 |
Which of the following was NOT a verb used in Loftus and Palmers experiment? Collided, slammed, bumped, contacted, smashed | Slammed |
Which verb produced the highest mean speed in Loftus + Palmer’s research? | Smashed |
What was the mean speed estimate when the verb was smashed in Loftus + Palmer’s research? | 40.5 mph |
What was the mean speed estimate when the verb used was contacted in Loftus and Palmer’s research? | 31.8 mph |
What was the IV of Loftus + Palmers experiment? | The verb used in the critical question |
What was the DV in Loftus + Palmers experiment? | The participants speed estimates in mph |
AO3: Loftus + Palmer used a lab experiment. Name one STRENGTH of using a lab experimental method. | High control over extraneous variables - high in internal validity OR Uses standardised instructions, which can be repeated - high in reliability |
AO3: Loftus + Palmer showed participants a video of a car crash - how could this be criticised? Why is this a problem? | Mundane realism - artificial task of watching video of car crash unlike real life - low in external validity |
What two ways does post-event discussion affect accuracy of EWT? | 1. Memory contamination 2. Memory conformity |
Memory contamination is where co-witnesses memory of an event is altered because they __________ information from other witnesses | Combine |
What explanation of conformity would explain a witness going along with another witness’ version of events to be liked? | Normative social influence |
What explanation of conformity would explain a witness going along with another witness because they believe the other is right? | Informational social influence |