Back to AI Flashcard MakerPsychology /GCSE Psychology (AQA) 2024: 9 Mark Studies

GCSE Psychology (AQA) 2024: 9 Mark Studies

Psychology56 CardsCreated about 2 months ago

This flashcard set outlines Penfield’s research into the temporal lobe and interpretive cortex, conducted using the Montreal procedure on awake epilepsy patients. It explores his findings on memory and emotional experiences and evaluates both strengths—like the precise brain mapping method—and weaknesses, such as the unusual sample and inconsistent results in later studies.

outline Penfield’s study of the interpretive cortex

A: to investigate the function of the temporal lobe using the Montreal procedure
M: operated on patients with severe epilepsy, he could stimulate areas of the brain in a conscious patient who reported their experiences
R:-when stimulation was applied to the different areas the patients reported different things:
-visual cortex=colors, shadows and crude outlines of objects
-somatosensory cortex=tingling sensation or a false sense of movement
-temporal lobe (in either hemisphere)=experiences and feelings (hallucinations) associated with those experiences, including deja vu
C: area stimulated in the temporal lobe has a role in storing memories of previous events
stored in 2 different ways:
facts of the experience and facts for the individual
the interpretive cortex stores info on feelings

Tap or swipe ↕ to flip
Swipe ←→Navigate
1/56

Key Terms

Term
Definition

outline Penfield’s study of the interpretive cortex

A: to investigate the function of the temporal lobe using the Montreal procedure
M: operated on patients with severe epilepsy, he could stimulat...

what is a strength of Penfield’s study

*precise method

P- used a precise method of studying the brain
E- could stimulate the exact same part of the brain and have verbal reports from awake patients

what is a weakness of Penfield’s study

*unusual sample

P- unusual sample
E- all participants had severe epilepsy
L- may not reflect people that have “normal” brains

what is a weakness of Penfield’s study

*mixed results

P- mixed results in later research
E- findings weren’t consistent as in later research only 40/520 people recalled past experiences when the tem...

outline Tulving’s gold memory study

A: to investigate if episodic memories produce different blood flow patterns to semantic ones
M: -6 participants injected with radioactive gold ...

what is a strength of Tulving’s gold memory study

*objective evidence

P- produced objective (scientific) evidence
E- evidence from brain scans are difficult to fake
L- unbiased evidence

Related Flashcard Decks

Study Tips

  • Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
  • Review cards regularly to improve retention
  • Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
  • Share this deck with friends to study together
TermDefinition

outline Penfield’s study of the interpretive cortex

A: to investigate the function of the temporal lobe using the Montreal procedure
M: operated on patients with severe epilepsy, he could stimulate areas of the brain in a conscious patient who reported their experiences
R:-when stimulation was applied to the different areas the patients reported different things:
-visual cortex=colors, shadows and crude outlines of objects
-somatosensory cortex=tingling sensation or a false sense of movement
-temporal lobe (in either hemisphere)=experiences and feelings (hallucinations) associated with those experiences, including deja vu
C: area stimulated in the temporal lobe has a role in storing memories of previous events
stored in 2 different ways:
facts of the experience and facts for the individual
the interpretive cortex stores info on feelings

what is a strength of Penfield’s study

*precise method

P- used a precise method of studying the brain
E- could stimulate the exact same part of the brain and have verbal reports from awake patients
L- useful in enabling a “map of our brain functions” and would benefit neuroscience immensely

what is a weakness of Penfield’s study

*unusual sample

P- unusual sample
E- all participants had severe epilepsy
L- may not reflect people that have “normal” brains

what is a weakness of Penfield’s study

*mixed results

P- mixed results in later research
E- findings weren’t consistent as in later research only 40/520 people recalled past experiences when the temporal lobe was stimulated
L- interpretive cortex doesn’t always respond in the same way (lacks validity)

outline Tulving’s gold memory study

A: to investigate if episodic memories produce different blood flow patterns to semantic ones
M: -6 participants injected with radioactive gold they monitored blood flow using PET scans, repeated measures
-8 memory trials:
-4 episodic (holidays they had been on as a child
-4 semantic (recalling history facts)
R:-different blood flow in 3/6 participants
-semantic memories=greater concentration of blood towards posterior cortex
-episodic memories=greater concentration of blood towards frontal lobe
C:-suggests that episodic and semantic memories are separate forms of LTM and that they’re located in different areas of the brain (localised)
-supports the idea that memory has a biological bases

what is a strength of Tulving’s gold memory study

*objective evidence

P- produced objective (scientific) evidence
E- evidence from brain scans are difficult to fake
L- unbiased evidence

what is a weakness of Tulving’s gold memory study

*sample

P- restricted sample
E- only 6 participants including Tulving and his wife
conclusion was only based on 3 of the participants
L- data is inconclusive, difficult to generalise results to all people

what is a weakness of Tulving’s gold memory study

*episodic+semantic=similar

P- episodic and semantic memories are often very similar
E- episodic and semantic memories are difficult to separate
L- which may explain inconclusive evidence

outline Murdock’s serial position curve study

A: to investigate if memory of words was affected by where the words were positioned in the list
M: -words from the 4,000 most common words in english were chosen randomly
-participants listened to 20 word lists (with 10-40 words on them)
-they recalled the words after each list
R: -recall was related to the position of the word in the list
-higher recall=first few words (primacy)
-higher recall=the last words (recency) compared to words in the middle of the list
C: -shows the serial position effect=position of a word determines the likelihood of recall
-supports the MSM

what is strength of Murdock’s serial position curve study

*lab study

P- it was carried out in laboratory conditions
E- things like familiarity of words could be controlled
L- more certain that the position of the words affected recall

what is weakness of Murdock’s serial position curve study

*artificial task

P- task was artificial
E- list of words=relates to only 1 type of memory
L- results don’t relate to how we use our memories in other ways (personal events)

what is strength of Murdock’s serial position curve study

*supporting research

P- research with amnesiacs supports the conclusion
E- Carlesimo et al found that some amnesiacs can’t store long term memories and don’t show a primacy effect but show a recency effect
L- proves that primacy effect is related to LTM

outline Bartlett’s war of ghosts study

A:to investigate whether people’s memory for a story is affected by previous knowledge (schemas) and the extent to which memory is reconstructive
M:-Bartlett gave British participants a Native American Folk story to read (culture different from their own) called “War of Ghosts”
-after 15 minutes he asked them to reproduce the story to another person who then has to recall it to someone else (Chinese whisperers)
-each time the story was reproduced a record was made, he asked them again and again over a period of months and years (serial production)
R: -main idea of story was remembered
-changed unfamiliar elements to make sense of the story using more familiar terms to their cultural expectations
eg= -shortened by omissions
-phrases were changed to language and concepts from the participants’ own culture (boat->canoe)
-slight variations
C: -our memory isn’t an exact copy of what we hear
-distorted by what we already know about the world
-people don’t remember details, we remember fragments and use our knowledge of social situations to reconstruct memory

what is a strength of Bartlett’s war of ghosts study

*eye witness testimony

P- explains problems with eye witness testimony
E- this research showed memory is affected by expectations showing that people don’t always recall accurately
L- EWT is no longer solely relied on as evidence in criminal investigations

what is a strength of Bartlett’s war of ghosts study

*real life

P- reflects how we use memory in our everyday life
E- uses a story instead of artificial materials
L- findings are more relevant to real life memory processes

what is a weakness of Bartlett’s war of ghosts study

*“something black”

P- not all memories are reconstructed
E- participants often recalled “something black came out of his mouth” because it was distinctive
L- shows some memories are accurate

outline Von Frisch’s bee study

A: to describe dances of honey bees to understand their communication
M: -observed bees in their natural habitat
-sometimes changed their environment–>put food close to hive (10-20 meters) and far away (up to 300 meters)
-observed bees 6,000 times over 20 years
R: -bees tell each other where sources of pollen are
-round dance: moving in circle to show pollen is less than 100 meters away
-waggle dance: figure of eight shows the direction
-60% of bees went to sources at the distance indicated by the dances
C: sophisticated communication system

what is a strength of Von Frisch’s bee study

*valuable

P- important contribution to science
E- opened people’s eyes to the capabilities of animals
L- great scientific value

what is a weakness of Von Frisch’s bee study

*sound=overlooked

P- importance of sound was overlooked
E- when the bees performed dances in silence, other bees wouldn’t go and investigate the food sources
L- the communication system may be more complex and might include sound based signals

what is a weakness of Von Frisch’s bee study

*don’t always respond

P- bees don’t always respond to the waggle dance
E- bees wouldn’t use the info from the waggle dance when food was placed on a boat in the middle of a lake (bees may know instinctively that food won’t be found in the middle of water/may prefer not to)
L- may be other factors that affect communication; these aren’t investigated so the research is limited

outline Yuki’s study of emoticons

A: to find out if there’s a difference in interpretation of emoticons in Japan and America
M: -95 Japanese students and 118 American students
-participants were presented with a set of six emoticons with different combinations of eyes and mouths (happy, sad, neutral)
-participants were then asked to rate the faces in terms of happiness expressed (9 point likert scale), average was then worked out
R: -Japanese: higher happiness rating for happy eyes than Americans
-American: higher happiness rating for happy mouths even with sad eyes
C: -suggests that Japanese and American people interpret facial expressions differently (may be due to social norms and expectations)
-Americans: brought up to express emotion openly—>look at mouths
-Japanese: brought up to hide emotions—>eyes may be a better way of telling how they’re feeling

what is a weakness of Yuki’s study of emoticons

*artificial materials

P- emoticons may not represent human faces
E- emoticons leave out features such as wrinkle lines which may be important when judging emotion
L- study may lack relevance to everyday life

what is a weakness of Yuki’s study of emoticons

*only 2 emotions

P- the study only investigated 2 types of emotion (happy or sad)
E- in everyday life we express a range of emotions so the results/conclusions may not be true for all other emotions
L- doesn’t give us insight into how the full range of emotional expressions are interpreted by people of different cultures

what is a weakness of Yuki’s study of emoticons

*rating scales

P- rating scales were used
E- emotions are very complex and ratings scales reduce emotion to a single score
L- may have measured the interpretation of emotions in too simple a way

outline Wile's study

70% of depressed people are treatment resistant, holistic approach using antidepressants and CBT=more effective
A: to test the benefit of using CBT plus antidepressants for treatment resistant depression rather than antidepressants alone
M: -469 participants with treatment resistant depression
-patients were randomly assigned to 2 conditions:
-usual care (antidepressants only) -usual care+CBT
-improvement was measured using Beck's Depression inventory (symptoms)
R: at the end of 6 months:
-usual care: 21.6% had more than 50% reduction in symptoms
-usual care+CBT: 46.1% had more than 50% reduction in symptoms
-after 12 months people with usual care+CBT continued to have better recovery
C: using CBT with antidepressants is more effective than antidepressants alone

what is a strength of WIle's study

| *well designed

P- well designed study
E- participants were randomly assigned to groups and initial BDI scores were checked on average so that both groups were similar so extraneous variables were carefully controlled
L- changes in the dependent variable weren't affected by potential extraneous variables

what is a weakness of WIle's study

| *self report methods

P- self report methods were used to determine levels of depression
E- participants had to make subjective judgements so they may overestimate or underestimate how sad they feel or may not answer truthfully
L- results may lack validity

what is a strength of WIle's study

| *real world application

P- focuses on developing a useful therapy
E- study lead to a useful holistic approach which can treat depression more successfully
L- real world application and can help people that suffer from depression

outline Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse

A: to see if alcohol addiction is due to nature (hereditary factors) or nurture using twins
M: -male twins
-at least one twin was registered with the Temperance board which followed individuals who had problems with alcohol abuse
-interviews were conducted with the twins and close relatives to collect info about drinking habits and whether they were identical or non identical
R: -percentage of twins that co twin registered was higher for identical twins than non identical twins
-61% of identical (MZ) and 34% of non identical twins were both alcoholics
-it was also noted that twins with social problems were over presented
C: -alcoholism is related to hereditary factors
-NOT 100% genetic or MZ twins would all be the same
-NOT 100% environmental or MZ and DZ would be the same

what is a weakness of Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse

| *flaws in study design

P- flaws in the design of his study
E- temperance board only includes drinkers who made a public display of their alcohol abuse which doesn't mean they're addicted so the classifications weren't accurate
L- results lack validity

what is a strength of Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse

| *supported

P- supported by later research
E- Kendler found that MZ twins are more likely to both be alcoholics (48%) than DZ twins (33%)
L- supports view that genetic factors have a major influence on alcoholism

what is a weakness of Kaij's twin study of alcohol abuse

| *misleading

P- biological explanations of addiction may be misleading
E- inheriting certain genes does not make addiction inevitable as life events also play a role
L- the study implies that genes are more influential than they actually are

outline Asch's study of conformity

A: to investigate group pressure in an unambiguous situation
M: -participants (123 male students) thought they were taking part in a study of visual perception
-participants were shown a standard line and three comparison lines, they were told to pick which line was the same as the standard line
-each participant was tested with a group of 6/8 confederates and the true participant was always sat at the end so they could hear everyone else's answers first
-the first 12 trials the participants said the correct answer to gain trust
-the last 6 trials the confederates all gave the identical wrong answer
-Asch counted how many times the participant agreed with this wrong answer
R: when wrong answers were given:
-32% conformed overall
-5% always conformed
-75% conformed at least once
-25% never conformed
C:-majority of people are influenced by group pressure

- though many can resist

what is a weakness of Asch's study of conformity

| *child of the times

P- results may only be relevant to 1950s America
E- 1950s America was a particularly conformist as politicians ensured that people followed the rules so people were afraid to behave differently
L- his research isn't consistent over time and may only be apparent in certain conditions

what is a weakness of Asch's study of conformity

| *artificial task

P- task and situation was artificial
E- judging the length of a line with strangers isn't an everyday task
L- results may not reflect everyday situations (especially when the consequences of conformity are more

what is a weakness of Asch's study of conformity

| *collectivist

P- Asch's research is more reflective of conformity in individualist cultures (UK and America)
E- research has found that conformity studies done in collectivist countries (China) produce higher conformity rates as they're more oriented to group needs
L- suggests that Asch's findings are probably less reflective of conformity in collectivist cultures

outline Piliavin's subway study

A: to investigate if characteristics of a victim affect help given in an emergency
M: -103 trials -4 researchers
-"victim" (male student) staged a collapse on the subway and remained on the floor until help was coming
-38 trials: victim smelled of alcohol and carried a bottle of alcohol wrapped in a brown bag (drunk condition)
-65 trials: victim appeared sober and carried a black cane (disabled condition)
-victim dressed and behaved the same in both conditions
R: -disabled condition: helped at some point on 95% of the trials and 87% of the of the victims were helped in the first 70 seconds after they collapsed
-drunk condition: helped at some point on 50% of the trials and 17% of the of the victims were helped in the first 70 seconds after they collapsed
C: -characteristics of victim affects help given
-number of onlookers doesn't affect help in natural setting

what is a strength of Piliavin's subway study

| *high realism

P- high realism
E- participants weren't aware that their behaviour was being studied so they responded how they would normally (natural)
L- results have high validity

what is a weakness of Piliavin's subway study

| *urban sample

P- people studied were likely to be mainly people who lived in the city
E- they might have been accustomed to seeing beggars and may have become more used to ignoring someone in need
L- observed behaviour may not be typical of all people (info can't be generalised)

what is a strength of Piliavin's subway study

| *qualitative data

P- qualitative data was recorded
E- observers noted remarks from passengers which gives a deeper insight into why people didn't help
L- has the value of both qualitative and quantitative data

outline research investigating how motivation affects perception
(Gilchrist and Nesberg)

A: to investigate if food deprivation affects the perception of food
M: -one group went without food for 20 hours whereas the other group ate as normal
-all participants were shown a set of pictures (4 typical meals) on a screen for 15 seconds
-they were shown the pictures again but the researcher had changed the brightness settings
-they were then asked to adjust the lighting so that it looked like the original
R: -no food group: adjusted lighting so that it was brighter than before
-food group: adjusted it similar to the original photo
C: hunger is a motivating factor that affects perception

what is a strength of Gilchrist and Nesberg's research into how motivation affects perception
*support

P- support from similar studies
E- Sanford found that food deprived participants were more likely to see vague pictures as food
L- strengthens validity

what is a weakness of Gilchrist and Nesberg's research into how motivation affects perception
*unethical

P- deprived people of food
E- may have caused discomfort (physical harm)
L- raises ethical issues

what is a weakness of Gilchrist and Nesberg's research into how motivation affects perception
*individual differences

P- used independent groups design (individual differences)
E- participants may have perceived things differently
L- results may be inaccurate

outline research investigating how expectation affects perception
(Bruner and Minturn)

A: to investigate if an ambiguous figure is seen differently if context is changed
M: -lab, independent groups
-one group was shown a sequence of letters and the other group was showed a sequence of numbers
-were shown an ambiguous figure and were asked wether they saw it as a B or a 13
R: -saw letters: more likely to report it as a B
-saw numbers: more likely to report it as a 13
C: expectation is affected by the context the figure is presented

what is a weakness of Bruner and Minturn's research into how expectation affects perception
*artificial task

P- used an artificial task
E- ambiguous figures are designed to trick perception
L- lacks validity

what is a weakness of Bruner and Minturn's research into how expectation affects perception
*individual differences

P- used independent groups design
E- might have been individual differences
L-may be inaccurate as difference in perception may have been due to participant variables rather than expectation

what is a strength of Bruner and Minturn's research into how expectation affects perception
*real world application

P- real world application
E- explains errors made as a result of expectation
L- helps explain why people make serious mistakes on tasks in the real world

outline the naughty teddy study

| (McGarrigle and Donaldson)

A: aimed to see whether the child's reaction would be different if there was no deliberate change in the row of counters
M: -80 children aged 4/6 years old
-introduced to "naughty teddy" who could spoil their game
-shown 2 rows of equal counters
-teddy jumps out of box and pushes the counters in one row about, transforming display by making one row look smaller
-child was then asked if the rows were the same
R: -deliberate change: 41% gave the correct answer (same number in each row)
-accidental change: 68% gave the correct answer
-older children did better than younger children
C: -Piaget's method doesn't show what children can do (nursery kids conserved quantity)
-older children did better than younger ones which supports Piaget's idea that the way children think changes as they grow older

what is a weakness of the naughty teddy study

| *sample

P- primary children all came from one school
E- primary kids may have done better than the nursery kids due to their educational backgrounds, may have coped better due to their better developed language/better educated families
L- challenges validity of conclusions as other factors can explain the difference

what is a weakness of the naughty teddy study

| *distracted

P- the children's better performance in the accidental condition may be because they didn't notice any change had taken place
E- the children may have been distracted by the teddy and didn't realise anything had changed so they kept their original answer (that both rows were the same)
L- just means that the children weren't looking, not conserving

what is a strength of the naughty teddy study

| *challenges Piaget

P- challenges some of Piaget's assumptions
E- shows that Piaget confused young children with his style of questioning, children are actually more able
L- helps to refine his theory

outline Hughe's policeman study

A: aimed to create a task that would be more understandable than Piaget's
M: -30 kids 3 1/2 to 5 year olds

 - children were asked to hide a boy doll from two policeman dolls on a model with different sections 
 -practice was given beforehand 

R: -90% could hide the boy doll away from 2 policemen
-with a more complex task (more sections) the 3 year olds had more trouble (60% correct) whereas the 4 year olds had 90% success
C: -children aged 4 are mostly not egocentric
-Piaget underestimated younger children's abilities
-correct that thinking changes with age

what is a strength of Hughe's policeman study

| *made more sense

P- task made more sense to the children than Piaget's version
E- policeman task was more realistic and a similar to something they'd experience in everyday life, the children also had practice so they fully understood task
L-more realistic test of abilities/the children's capabilities

what is a weakness of Hughe's policeman study

| *unintentional cues

P- researcher may have unintentionally hinted about the correct answer
E- researcher may have unconsciously given cues (gazing in a certain direction) and influenced the child's behaviour
L- results may lack validity

what is a strength of Hughe's policeman study

| *challenges Piaget

P- challenges some of Piaget's assumptions
E- study shows that Piaget's task confused the children making them appear like less able thinkers
L- helps to refine his theory