| scientific study of causes/origins of disorders or abnormal behaviour important because of the idea that treatment should be related to the cause of the disorder (i.e. if the disorder is caused by biological factors, a biomedical approach to treatment should be used)
|
| evolutionary theory (Hagen et al., 2004) genetic predisposition (Kendler et al., 2006) serotonin hypothesis (Coppen, 1967) cortisol hypothesis
|
biological etiologies: evolutionary theory | Hagen et al. (2004): depression signals need/attention to elicit help from members of the group however, like all evolutionary theories this is impossible to test experimentally
|
biological etiologies: genetic predisposition | Kendler et al. (2006): massive twin study on 42000 participants found that concordance rates among monozygotic twins of 44% for female and 31% for male, while dizygotic twins exhibited 16% for female and 11% for male if the disorder were purely genetic, we might expect the monozygotic concordance rates to be much higher but the difference between monozygotic and dizygotic concordance rates is enough to indicate a strong genetic component
|
biological etiologies: evaluation of genetic predisposition | some evidence for genetic predisposition (Kendler et al., 2006) but depression is a complex disorder environmental factors (e.g. stress) also play an important role
|
biological etiologies: serotonin hypothesis | Main idea: depression is caused by low serotonin levels (Coppen, 1967) - supported by the effectiveness of the drug Prozac, which improves mood by inhibiting serotonin reuptake |
biological etiologies: against serotonin hypothesis | short alleles of the 5-HTT gene also inhibits serotonin reuptake like Prozac, but its carriers are more likely to suffer depression NOTE: Levinson (2005) argues that the 5-HTT gene simply makes individuals more sensitive to stressful life events, and doesn’t necessarily cause depression
Sarek (2006): tianeptine, a drug used in Europe and South America to treat depression, enhances serotonin reuptake… Lacasse and Leo (2005): lack of evidence that low serotonin causes depression the effectiveness of a treatment doesn’t imply a causal effect (e.g. aspirin alleviates headaches, but headaches are not caused by a lack of aspirin)
|
biological etiologies: evaluation of serotonin hypothesis | some evidence that serotonin may be involved in depression (effect of Prozac) but research doesn’t show a clear link between serotonin and depression see how short allele of 5-HTT gene and Prozac generally has same biological effect but opposite physiological effect there may be a confounding variable we are unaware of
|
biological etiologies: cortisol hypothesis | the stress hormone cortisol may play a role in the development of depression particularly high cortisol levels appears to have damaging effects on a developing brain Burke et al (2005): cortisol activity differs between depressed and non-depressed – non-depressed’s cortisol levels rise and fall rapidly during and after stressful situations, but depressed’s cortisol levels remain high for longer after stressful situations Cutuli et al. (2010): significant correlation between high levels of cortisol and a history of negative life events
|
evaluation of biological etiologies | lots of evidence of physiological correlations to mental state but we don’t have a clear understanding of how depression might develop biologically still need to research more about interactions between stressful life events, genes, hormones, and neurotransmitters
|
| Beck (1976): depression is caused by a cluster of negative thoughts in 3 categories: the self, the world, and the future these thoughts form a vicious cycle of negative automatic thoughts the triad is perpetuated by cognitive biases like over-generalization (about negative aspects, e.g. “I never do well in tests”), polar reasoning (i.e. does not take any ambiguities), and selective abstraction (i.e. only focusing on the negatives) contradicts traditional depression theories: negative thinking is typically considered to be a symptom of depression, not the cause
cognitive triad in action: self (“I’m not good at anything”) → world (“Everyone hates me because I’m worthless”) → future (“I’ll never be good at anything because everyone hates me”) → repeat |
evaluation of cognitive triad | Strengths: descriptively very powerful Robins and Block (1989): depressed people have negative thinking styles Lewinshohn et al. (2001): negative thinking and high stress levels often preceded the onset of depression Boury et al. (2001): there is a significant correlation between amount of negative automatic thoughts and the severity of depression (BUT they also note that correlation =! causation) treatment: Beck’s cognitive triad resulted in the creation of CBT (cognitive-behavioural therapy)
Weaknesses: Boury et al. (2001): correlation =! causation no explanations: unclear whether this model reflects cause of depression or simply disordered thinking Taylor and Brown (1988): depressed people interpret events more realistically
|
| |
sociocultural etiologies: unemployment/poverty | Brown and Harris (1978): interviewed 450 London women unemployed single mothers who lacked social support were most likely to undergo depression thus Brown and Harris identified 3 vulnerability factors: unemployment/poverty, lack of social support, and social responsibilities (e.g. children to take care of)
|
sociocultural etiologies: evaluation of unemployment/poverty | received much support on vulnerability factors but it can be argued that the factors are unlikely to be responsible for creating feelings of sadness, only propagating it
|
sociocultural etiologies: social inequality | Cohen (2002): historically, rates of depression are higher when social inequalities are deeper possibly due to feelings of powerlessness and worthlessness that are exacerbated by physical conditions (e.g. stress, malnourishment) may also be a product of socialization within individualist, materialist cultures; comparing to higher socioeconomic groups leads to perceptions of inequality, unfairness and inability to participate in ‘ideal’ society
|
sociocultural etiologies: individualistic and collectivistic influences | Wu and Anthony (2000): lower prevalence of depression in Hispanic communities, possibly because levels of social support are higher Gabilondo et al. (2010): depression occurs less frequently in Spain than in other European countries, possibly because of strong traditional roles of family and religiousness Chiao and Blizinsky (2010): depression was associated with individualism, but strangely the short 5-HTT allele was more common in collectivist countries – perhaps collectivist cultural norms (e.g. increased social support) was developed to protect more biologically vulnerable groups
|