Back to AI Flashcard MakerPsychology /Psychological - W2 - Chapter 5 - Reliability (DN) Part 4

Psychological - W2 - Chapter 5 - Reliability (DN) Part 4

Psychology14 CardsCreated about 2 months ago

This deck covers key concepts from Chapter 5 on reliability in psychological testing, focusing on generalizability theory, variance, error variance, and methods for estimating reliability.

60 universe

in GENERALIZABILITY THEORY the TOTAL CONTEXT of a particular test situation including ALL the FACTORS that lead to an individual testtakers score p.167
Tap or swipe ↕ to flip
Swipe ←→Navigate
1/14

Key Terms

Term
Definition
60 universe
in GENERALIZABILITY THEORY the TOTAL CONTEXT of a particular test situation including ALL the FACTORS that lead to an individual testtakers score p.16...

universe score

in GENERALIZABILITY THEORY a test score corresponding to the PARTICULAR UNIVERSE being assessed or evaluated p. 167

variance

a statistic useful in describing SOURCES of test score variability equal to the MEAN of the SQUARES of the DIFFERENCES between SCORES in a distribu...

What is the main challenge of a test creator?

to MAXIMIZE the proportion of TOTAL VARIANCE that is TRUE VARIANCE and to MINIMIZE the proportion that is ERROR VARIANCE - p.147

What are four main SOURCES of ERROR VARIANCE?

1) TEST CONSTRUCTION item sampling/content sampling 2) TEST ADMINISTRATION test environment; testtaker variables; examiner related variable. 3) TES...

What are some methods of measuring INTERNAL CONSISTENCY of a test's items?

1) SPEARMAN-BROWN FORMULA p.153-4 2) KUDER-RICHARDSON FORMULAS p.155-6 3) COEFFICIENT ALPHA p.157 4) AVERAGE PROPORTIONAL DISTANCE (APD) p.157

Related Flashcard Decks

Study Tips

  • Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
  • Review cards regularly to improve retention
  • Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
  • Share this deck with friends to study together
TermDefinition
60 universe
in GENERALIZABILITY THEORY the TOTAL CONTEXT of a particular test situation including ALL the FACTORS that lead to an individual testtakers score p.167

universe score

in GENERALIZABILITY THEORY a test score corresponding to the PARTICULAR UNIVERSE being assessed or evaluated p. 167

variance

a statistic useful in describing SOURCES of test score variability equal to the MEAN of the SQUARES of the DIFFERENCES between SCORES in a distribution and THEIR MEAN calculated by SQUARING & SUMMING all the DEVIATION SCORES then DIVIDING by the total number of scores p.95, 146

What is the main challenge of a test creator?

to MAXIMIZE the proportion of TOTAL VARIANCE that is TRUE VARIANCE and to MINIMIZE the proportion that is ERROR VARIANCE - p.147

What are four main SOURCES of ERROR VARIANCE?

1) TEST CONSTRUCTION item sampling/content sampling 2) TEST ADMINISTRATION test environment; testtaker variables; examiner related variable. 3) TEST SCORING and INTERPRETATION scorers; scoring systems). 4) OTHER SOURCES OF ERROR sampling error methodological error - researchers not trained, ambiguous wording, item biases) p. 147 - 149

What are some methods of measuring INTERNAL CONSISTENCY of a test's items?

1) SPEARMAN-BROWN FORMULA p.153-4 2) KUDER-RICHARDSON FORMULAS p.155-6 3) COEFFICIENT ALPHA p.157 4) AVERAGE PROPORTIONAL DISTANCE (APD) p.157

How is obtaining estimates of ALTERNATE-FORMS reliability & PARALLEL FORMS reliability SIMILAR?

1) Two test administrations with the SAME GROUP are required 2) Test scores between tests may be AFFECTED by factors such as MOTIVATION, FATIGUE, or INTERVENING EVENTS (practise, learning or therapy) - although not as much as if the EXACT SAME test had been administered twice

What is an INHERENT source of ERROR-VARIANCE when computing an ALTERNATE or PARALLEL-FORMS reliability coefficient?

ITEM SAMPLING ERROR | p. 152

What are the THREE steps of computation of a COEFFICIENT of SPLIT-HALF RELIABILITY?

Step 1 - Divide the test into EQUIVALENT HALVES Step 2 - calculate a Pearson r between scores on the TWO HALVES of the test STEP 3 - adjust the HALF-TEST reliability using the SPEARMAN-BROWN FORMULA (p.152-153)

Contrast the Coefficient alpha & Pearson r

Ca - 0-1 Pr - -1 to +1 Ca - gauging how SIMILAR data sets are PR - dealing with SIMILARITY & DISSIMILARITY

What is the DIFFERENCE between the FOCUS of Average proportional distance (APD) and SPLIT-HALF methods & CRONBACH's ALPHA?

APD - focus is on the DEGREE of DIFFERENCE between item scores SH & CA - focus is on SIMILARITIES between item scores p.157

What are the 3 approaches to ESTIMATING RELIABILITY?

1) test-retest 2) alternate or parallel forms 3) internal or inter-item consistency method chosen will depend on a number of factors - e.g., the PURPOSE, NATURE for obtaining the measure p. 160

How do we decide which RELIABILITY COEFFICIENT to CHOOSE (use)?

the method chosen will depend on a number of factors - e.g., the PURPOSE, NATURE for obtaining the measure NOTE: the various RELIABILITY COEFFICIENTS DO NOT all reflect the same SOURCES of ERROR VARIANCE see pg. 161 (impt to understand why each test is selected, also refer to Table 5-4)

What are the 3 ASSUMPTIONS made when using IRT?

1) Unidimensionality 2) Local Independence 3) Monotonicity p. 170