Research Ethics & IRB Part 1
This is provides essential concepts and facts related to ethical research practices involving human subjects. Topics include the three foundational principles of the Belmont Report—Respect for Persons, Beneficence, and Justice—along with the history of research ethics (e.g., Nuremberg Code), types of IRB reviews (Exempt, Expedited, Full Board), and requirements for informed consent. Ideal for students, researchers, and faculty preparing to engage in ethical research or complete IRB applications.
Three principles of Belmont Report
Respect for Persons
Beneficence
Justice
Key Terms
Three principles of Belmont Report
Respect for Persons
Beneficence
Justice
The Belmont Report
Principle of Beneficence
MAXIMIZATION of benefits and MINIMIZATION of risks
T/F
Belmont Report indicates it is necessary to rigorously avoid conflicts of interest
TRUE
The Belmont Report
Respect for Person
Requires that subjects freely choose to participate in research (voluntariness) and that they are adequately informed about a study (informed conse...
The Belmont Report defines and delineates...
"Practice" and "Research"
The Belmont Report
The Principle of Justice
Research benefit and burden distribution and that selection of subjects is fair.
Related Flashcard Decks
Study Tips
- Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
- Review cards regularly to improve retention
- Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
- Share this deck with friends to study together
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
Three principles of Belmont Report | Respect for Persons |
The Belmont Report | MAXIMIZATION of benefits and MINIMIZATION of risks |
T/F | TRUE |
The Belmont Report | Requires that subjects freely choose to participate in research (voluntariness) and that they are adequately informed about a study (informed consent) |
The Belmont Report defines and delineates... | "Practice" and "Research" |
The Belmont Report | Research benefit and burden distribution and that selection of subjects is fair. |
T/F | FALSE |
Students in Research | Nuremberg Code |
Nuremberg Code | Human subjects research guidelines and regulations |
Year of the Nuremberg Code | 1949 |
Additional resources regarding IRB approval process | Faculty advisor/Research Mentor |
What element must be included in an informed consent? | All foreseeable risks and discomforts |
Which type of IRB review does not require and IRB approval but DOES require a Determination by the IRB? | If the study qualifies for EXEMPTION |
Another name for the "Exempt" status | the Common Rule |
How can faculty researchers avoid coercion of student subjects? | Avoid using their own students in their research |
Name the type of Review: Research study that involves use of educational tests, survey, interviews, or observations of public behavior without identifiable information. | Exempt Review category 2 |
Name the type of review: A study involving data collected that could have an impact on human subject's careers and it contains identifiers of the subjects. | Full Board Review |
Type of review that qualifies if no identification of subjects and/or their responses would reasonably place them at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects financial standing, employability, insurability, reputation, or be stigmatizing, unless reasonable and appropriate protections will be implemented so that risks related to invasion of privacy and breach of confidentiality are no greater than minimal | Expedited review |
Type of review: data that is collected does not meet definition of human subjects research as stated by federal regulations. No info ABOUT human ie. info about a business | Not Human Subjects |
Federal regulations define human subjects as "living individual about whom an investigator conducting research obtains"...? (2 components) | "1.data through intervention or interaction with the individual |
Name the 3 responsibilities the IRB is charged with | 1. Protecting the rights and welfare of human subjects |
T/F | False |
T/F | True |
DHHS | Depts. IRB's review for current policies |
Name the study that links most directly to the establishment of the National Research Act in 1974 and ultimately the Belmont Report and Federal regulations for human subject protection | The Public Health Service Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male |
The Tuskegee Study relates to which Belmont principle? | The principle of beneficence: Potential benefits justify the risks of harm |
Humphreys collecting data for the Tearoom Trade study under the pretense that he was a lookout is an example of a violation of the principle of: | Respect for persons |
According to the Belmont Report, the moral requirement that there be fair outcomes in the selection of research subjects, expresses the principle of: | Justice |
How is the principle of beneficence applied to a study involving human subjects? | Ensuring that risks are reasonable in relationship to anticipated benefits. |
Human subject study or not? | Yes |
Human subject study or not? | No:Human subject is a living individual |
Human subject study or not?Questioning individuals to acquire data about the number of newly diagnosed HIV cases? | No: 'what' question rather than 'who' question |
Human subject study or not? | Not: involves neither interaction with individuals nor collecting private identified info |
Human subject study or not? | Yes: humans |
Human subject study? | Yes: Interacting w/ living individuals |
Human subject study or not? | No: it is an "about what" question rather than "about whom" question |
Human subject study or not? | Yes: contributes to generalizable knowledge about student performance and research question can only be answered using systematic investigation |
Human subject study or not? | No: does not involve info about human subjects even though there is interactions between designer and school staff. |
Human subject study or not? | No: doesn't involve interactions w/ living individuals nor collection of private identifiable data |
Human subject study or not? | No: does gather info from people with relevant info and expertise but does not meet the definition of research w/ human subjects, because the intention of the study is to answer "about what" ? rather than "about whom" ? |
According to fed. regulations, human subjects are living human beings about whom an investigator obtains data through interactions or intervention with the individual or: | identifiable PRIVATE information |
Subpart of DHHS regulations provides additional protections for which vulnerable populations? | 1. Pregnant women |
Subpart of DHHS regulations Does NOT provide additional protections for which vulnerable populations? | 1. elderly |
The expedited review process may be used when the study procedures pose: | No more than minimal risk and the research activities fall within regulatory categories identified as eligible |
The expedited review process may NOT be used when the study procedures pose: | -more than minimal risk, even if the subjects are adults, |
Continuing review of an approved and ongoing protocol...? | -unanticipated problems |
T/F | True, however no one may overrule if an IRB disapproved a protocol |
An investigator wishes to study generational differences in coping mechanisms among adults who experiences abuse as children. Adequate meausre will be instituted to obtain consent and ensure that there is no breach of confidentiality. The most likely additional risk is that some subjects may: | Experience emotional or psychological distress |
If disclosure of a subject's involvement in a specific research study can be potentially harmful to the subject, and the consent form is the only record linking the subject to the research, which would be the most helpful? | Obtain a waiver of documentation of informed consent |
The primary purpose of a Certificate of Confidentiality is to: | Protect identifiable research info from compelled disclosure |
Certificates of Confidentiality protect sensitive info provided by research subjects from: | civil, criminal, or administrative subpoena |
T/F | False: Risk must be determined by assessing magnitude (or severity) and probability (or likelihood) of harm. Both elements must be considered. |
Risks are specific to: | Time, situation, and culture |
A researcher who is also a care provider needs to be very clear that a decision to participate or not in a study will: | Not affect future care |
T/F | False: S/he needs both parental permission & child assent |
T/F | False |
T/F | True, it cannot be overridden |
Appropriate criterion for waiving informed consent when subjects are provided additional pertinent information after the study | informing participants they were assigned to a study based on undesirable or unflattering physical characteristics for example, or anything that may be judged negative or distressing would be considered appropriate criterion |
A waiver of the requirement for documentation of informed consent may be granted when: | The only record linking the subject and the research is the consent document and the principal risk is a breach of confidentiality |
As part of the consent process, the federal regulations require researchers to: | Provide potential subjects with information at the appropriate reading comprehension level. |