Supreme Court Cases
This deck covers key Supreme Court cases, focusing on McCulloch v. Maryland and Tinker v. Des Moines, including their backgrounds, decisions, and impacts.
McCuloch vs. Maryland Summary
The U.S. government created the first national bank for the country in 1791, a time during which a national bank was controversial due to competition, corruption, and the perception that the federal government was becoming too powerful. Maryland attempted to close the Baltimore branch of the national bank by passing a law that forced all banks that were created outside of the state to pay a yearly tax. James McCulloch, a branch employee, refused to pay the tax. The State of Maryland sued McCulloch saying that Maryland had the power to tax any business in its state and that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to create a national bank. McCulloch was convicted and fined, but he appealed the decision. The Supreme Court determined that Congres
Key Terms
McCuloch vs. Maryland Summary
The U.S. government created the first national bank for the country in 1791, a time during which a national bank was controversial due to competiti...
McCuloch vs. Maryland Supreme Court Decision
In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Sectio...
Majority Opinion McCuloch vs Maryland
Maryland may not impose a tax on the bank. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Mar...
Who was the McCuloch vs Maryland Majority Opinion Written By
John Marshall
McCuloch vs Maryland Dissenting Opinion
There was no dissenting opinion. The decision in McCulloch was formed unanimously, by a vote of 7-0. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the only.
McCuloch vs MAry land impact
The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland established that Congress had the power to establish a national bank and that a state (in this case, M...
Related Flashcard Decks
Study Tips
- Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
- Review cards regularly to improve retention
- Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
- Share this deck with friends to study together
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
McCuloch vs. Maryland Summary | The U.S. government created the first national bank for the country in 1791, a time during which a national bank was controversial due to competition, corruption, and the perception that the federal government was becoming too powerful. Maryland attempted to close the Baltimore branch of the national bank by passing a law that forced all banks that were created outside of the state to pay a yearly tax. James McCulloch, a branch employee, refused to pay the tax. The State of Maryland sued McCulloch saying that Maryland had the power to tax any business in its state and that the Constitution does not give Congress the power to create a national bank. McCulloch was convicted and fined, but he appealed the decision. The Supreme Court determined that Congres |
McCuloch vs. Maryland Supreme Court Decision | In McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution to create the Second Bank of the United States and that the state of Maryland lacked the power to tax the Bank. Vote: 7-0 |
Majority Opinion McCuloch vs Maryland | Maryland may not impose a tax on the bank. In a unanimous decision, the Court held that Congress had the power to incorporate the bank and that Maryland could not tax instruments of the national government employed in the execution of constitutional powers. |
Who was the McCuloch vs Maryland Majority Opinion Written By | John Marshall |
McCuloch vs Maryland Dissenting Opinion | There was no dissenting opinion. The decision in McCulloch was formed unanimously, by a vote of 7-0. Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the only. |
McCuloch vs MAry land impact | The Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland established that Congress had the power to establish a national bank and that a state (in this case, Maryland) did not have the power to tax branches of the federal government that are carrying out powers legal in the Constitution. |
Timker vs Moines Summary | John and Mary Beth Tinker of Des Moines, Iowa, wore black armbands to their public school as a symbol of protest against American involvement in the Vietnam War. When school authorities asked that the Tinkers remove their armbands, they refused and were subsequently suspended. The Supreme Court decided that the Tinkers had the right to wear the armbands, with Justice Abe Fortas stating that no one expects students to "shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate." |
Supreme Court decision Tinker vs Moines | The district court dismissed the case and held that the school district's actions were reasonable to uphold school discipline. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision without opinion. The Supreme Court ruled that the students had the right to wear armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. Vote: 7-2 |
What did Justice Abe Fortas say in the Tinker decision? | Justice Fortas wrote that students do not 'shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.' |