Civil Law /Gibbons v. Ogden Case

Gibbons v. Ogden Case

Civil Law3 CardsCreated about 2 months ago

This deck covers the key facts, case issue, origin, and ruling of the Gibbons v. Ogden case related to federal power to regulate interstate commerce.

Case Issue

Federal power to regulate interstate commerce.

Tap to flip
Space↑↓
←→Navigate
SSpeak
FFocus
1/3

Key Terms

Term
Definition

Case Issue

Federal power to regulate interstate commerce.

Case Origin

Aaron Ogden was granted the right to operate his steamboat service without any competition. Thomas Gibbons ran a competing service and had a licens...

Hover to peek or log in to view all

Case Ruling

In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that where state and federal laws on interstate commerce conflict, federal laws are superior.

Study Tips

  • Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
  • Review cards regularly to improve retention
  • Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
  • Share this deck with friends to study together
TermDefinition

Case Issue

Federal power to regulate interstate commerce.

Case Origin

Aaron Ogden was granted the right to operate his steamboat service without any competition. Thomas Gibbons ran a competing service and had a license to sail under the federal Coasting License Act of 1793. Gibbons was sued by Ogden for violating the monopoly given to him. Gibbons appealed to the US Supreme Court when New York's state court found in Ogden's favor.

Case Ruling

In a unanimous decision, the Court ruled that where state and federal laws on interstate commerce conflict, federal laws are superior.