Question: Three candidates showed up for an interview. Of all the candidates, only one was appropriated for the job. The first candidate arrived promptly and was dressed professionally. She spoke articulately and seemed a good fit for the organization. The next candidate was also on time, but his dress shirt was stained, his tie was crocked, and he seemed to struggle Three candidates showed up for an interview. Of all the candidates, only one was appropriated for the job. The first candidate arrived promptly and was dressed professionally. She spoke articulately and seemed a good fit for the organization. The next candidate was also on time, but his dress shirt was stained, his tie was crocked, and he seemed to struggle with the standard interview questions. His performance during the interview was not as impressive as the first candidate’s performance. The final candidate, dressed T-shirt and ripped jeans, arrived a full hour past the scheduled interview time. Because of her tardiness did not interview her. Q^1. Which of the following inferences can the reader draw according to the passage? A. Preparing for a job interview can compensate for inappropriate business attire B. A wide variety of applicants for this position ensure the company will find a good candidate C. Tardiness for a job interview will be interpreted as laziness and disorganization. D. Being on time for a job interview and dressing appropriately is important to securing. Q^2. Which of the following sentences from the passage is a fact? A. Because of her tardiness, we did not interview her. B. Of all the candidates, only one was appropriate for the job C. His performance during the interview was not as impressive as the first candidate D. She spoke articulately and seemed a good fit for the organization. Q^3. Which of the following is the writer’s purpose for writing this passage? A. To change B. To stereotype C. To explain D. To analyze
5 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1
: Identify the inferences that can be drawn from the passage.

An inference is a conclusion that can be drawn based on the information provided. In this case, we need to identify which of the given options can be inferred from the passage. A. Preparing for a job interview can compensate for inappropriate business attire This option cannot be inferred from the passage because the first candidate's preparation is not compared to the second candidate's attire. B. A wide variety of applicants for this position ensure the company will find a good candidate This option cannot be inferred from the passage as it only discusses three candidates and does not mention other applicants. C. Tardiness for a job interview will be interpreted as laziness and disorganization. This option can be inferred from the passage as it mentions that the third candidate arrived an hour late and was not interviewed due to her tardiness. D. Being on time for a job interview and dressing appropriately is important to securing the job. This option can be inferred from the passage as the first candidate, who was on time and dressed appropriately, was considered a good fit for the organization.

Final Answer

Tardiness for a job interview will be interpreted as laziness and disorganization and D. Being on time for a job interview and dressing appropriately is important to securing the job. Step 2: Identify the factual sentence(s) in the passage. A fact is a statement that can be proven true or false. In this case, we need to identify which of the given options is a fact based on the passage. A. Because of her tardiness, we did not interview her. This is a fact as it is stated in the passage that the third candidate was not interviewed due to her tardiness. B. Of all the candidates, only one was appropriate for the job This is not a fact as it is an inference that can be drawn from the passage, but it is not explicitly stated. C. His performance during the interview was not as impressive as the first candidate This is not a fact as it is an opinion and not a verifiable statement. D. She spoke articulately and seemed a good fit for the organization. This is not a fact as it is an opinion and not a verifiable statement. Because of her tardiness, we did not interview her. Step 3: Identify the writer's purpose for writing the passage. The writer's purpose is the intended effect or outcome of the writing. In this case, we need to identify the writer's purpose based on the passage. A. To change This option cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no call to action or suggestion for change. B. To stereotype This option cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no generalization or assumption made about a particular group. C. To explain This option cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no explanation of a concept or idea. D. To analyze This option cannot be inferred from the passage as there is no analysis of a problem or situation. However, we can infer that the writer's purpose is to describe a situation or event as the passage provides information about a job interview.