Analyzing Fallacies in Media: Appeal to Fear and Red Herring

Preview (2 of 2 Pages)

100%

Purchase to unlock

Loading page image...

Analyzing Fallacies in Media: Appeal to Fear and Red HerringPHI 103 Week 3DiscussionQuestion 2One rich source of fallacies is the media: television, radio, magazines, and the Internet(including, of course, commercials.) Identify twodistinct fallacies you see committed in themedia. Do you think it is more likely that you will not be fooled by these fallacies havingstudied logic? What do you think those presenting these arguments assume about thelogical skills of their viewers? Is this a good or bad assumption for them to make?Two distinct fallacies that I think are committed in the media is Appeal to Fear and Red Herring.An Appeal to Fear is a fallacy in which a person attempts to create support for an idea by usingdeception and propaganda in attempts to increase fear and prejudice toward a competitor. It’salso known as Scare Tactics, Appeal to Force, and Ad Baculum. (Changing minds, 2012). Anexample would be the media exaggerating issues in the world such as the Y2K scare, causinguncertainty and confusion among those who cannot discern the false and the truth. Manywebsites, blogs and forums have covered the topic of the Y2K excruciating detail, all under theassumption that preparation will be the necessary plan for many of us when the proverbial craphits the fan. This notion is predicated upon the belief that preparation for a world collapse isnecessary for your immediate survival in case of this event that you must plan and prepare fornow. However, nothing could be further from the real and actual truth. It seems like the media isvery good at this and likes providing this type of news. Putting the fear in people to stock up onwater and supplies to prepare for the worse. It’s very rare to see something good reported on thenews, but as soon as they get wind of something bad happening their all over it. I personallythink this is not good; yes it is important to know what is going on in the world. I personally willhardly watch the news anymore due to the fact that it can be very depressing.Another example is Red Herring. According to our text it states “A Red Herring fallacy iscommitted by someone who tries to avoid the issue by introducing another, irrelevant issue,hoping that it will then attract attention away from the issue that should be discussed.”(Mosser,2011). I believe politicians use this fallacy to avoid answering questions they don't really have ananswer for. Instead of just answering the question they will use their tactics to distract yourattention by changing the subject or by bringing up another issue.I think those committing fallacies in the media, especially in advertisement, assume that theaverage person will assume we will just take their word for it and not logically evaluate whatthey have told us. It’s really sad to say, but this is probably a good assumption for them to make,especially in advertising. They have been doing this type of advertising for many years now so

Loading page image...

Report

Study Now!

Document Details

Related Documents

Microsoft vs

Philosophers on Authority, Property, and Society

The Deadly Picnic A Lab on Deductive Reasoning

A Heart-Wrenching Tale of Sacrifice and Ethical Di

The Concept of the Übermensch in Nietzschean Philo

Symbolic Logic and Truth-Functional Statements

Assignment 1 World View Chart Writing Assignment � World religions paper

Understanding Logical Reasoning and Argumentation in Critical Thinking

Analyzing Logical Fallacies and Inferences: A Study of Reasoning and Argumentation

Exam IV: Exploring Alan Watts's Philosophical Perspectives: Games, Dualities, and the Illusion of Self

Company

Explore

Study Tools