Strayer LEG320 Week 5 Quiz
A solved quiz for LEG 320 covering week 5 legal topics.
Benjamin Fisher
Contributor
4.5
35
about 1 month ago
Preview (3 of 9)
Sign in to access the full document!
Strayer LEG320 Week 5 Quiz
Report this Question as Inappropriate
CHAPTER 8
CRIMINAL PUNISHMENTS
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. The Sixth Amendment requires that factual findings made for the purpose of enhancing a
sentence must be made by a
a. jury
b. judge
c. prosecuting attorney
d. defense attorney
2. In Ring v. Arizona,536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing
procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the
aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
a. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right of trial by jury
b. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right of trial by judge
c. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy trial
d. violated the Eight Amendment’s right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
3. In Blakely v. Washington, the Supreme Court held the sentence was invalid under the Sixth
Amendment, because the defendant was entitled to a jury trial on the facts supporting the finding
that he acted with
a. deliberate cruelty
b. deliberate indifference
c. deliberate apathy
d. deliberate malice
4. In Booker,the Court held that under the holdings of Apprendiand Blakeley,the Federal
Sentencing Guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment’s right to
a. jury trials in criminal cases
b. speedy trials in criminal cases
c. fair trials in criminal cases
d. an attorney in criminal cases
5. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are
a. no longer mandatory
b. no longer discretionary
Report this Question as Inappropriate
CHAPTER 8
CRIMINAL PUNISHMENTS
MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. The Sixth Amendment requires that factual findings made for the purpose of enhancing a
sentence must be made by a
a. jury
b. judge
c. prosecuting attorney
d. defense attorney
2. In Ring v. Arizona,536 U.S. 584 (2002), the Court held that a state capital sentencing
procedure that permitted the sentencing judge to make the factual determination of the
aggravating and mitigating circumstances present
a. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right of trial by jury
b. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right of trial by judge
c. violated the Sixth Amendment’s right to a speedy trial
d. violated the Eight Amendment’s right to freedom from cruel and unusual punishment
3. In Blakely v. Washington, the Supreme Court held the sentence was invalid under the Sixth
Amendment, because the defendant was entitled to a jury trial on the facts supporting the finding
that he acted with
a. deliberate cruelty
b. deliberate indifference
c. deliberate apathy
d. deliberate malice
4. In Booker,the Court held that under the holdings of Apprendiand Blakeley,the Federal
Sentencing Guidelines violated the Sixth Amendment’s right to
a. jury trials in criminal cases
b. speedy trials in criminal cases
c. fair trials in criminal cases
d. an attorney in criminal cases
5. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are
a. no longer mandatory
b. no longer discretionary
Preview Mode
Sign in to access the full document!
100%
Study Now!
XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat
Document Details
University
Strayer University
Subject
Civil Law