The Evolution and Application of Mens Rea in Modern Criminal Law
An exploration of mens rea, its evolution, and its application in modern criminal law.
Dylan Price
Contributor
4.4
42
6 months ago
Preview (2 of 4 Pages)
100%
Purchase to unlock
Page 1
Loading page ...
The Evolution and Application of Mens Rea in Modern Criminal LawIn the context of criminal law,mens rea(guilty mind) is considered essential in establishingcriminal liability. However, with the rapid advancement of technology and the introduction ofnew forms of crime (such as cybercrime), the application ofmens reahas become increasinglycomplex. Discuss howmens reais applied in modern legal systems, particularly in the UnitedStates, and evaluate whether it should be a required element in all criminal cases, including thoseinvolving new forms of crime. In your answer, consider the various mental states under theModel Penal Code (MPC), and explore how factors like self-defense, insanity, andtechnological ignorance influence the determination of criminal intent.Word Count Requirement:1,200–1,500 wordsGuilty mind in Latin is known as “Mens rea” and is viewed as one ofthe importantelements incrime("Mens Rea",2013).“Actusnon facit reum nisi mens sit rea” is a Latin phrase used toexpress that the commontestof criminal liabilityunder lawisthat the act is not culpable unlessthe mind is guilty.As the technology advances, nature of crime also has advanced making itcomparatively more difficult to prove any crime on the basis of mens rea or guilty mind in theUS.Under this principle, the mentalelement to offence should beproved witha subjective orobjective test, where the court must be convincedabout the accused of possessing the requiredmental element at the relevant time such as purposely, knowingly, recklessly etc; objective,where the requisite mens rea element is imputed to the accused, on the basis that a reasonableperson would have had the mental element in the same circumstances. ("Mens rea",2013).Inother words, men rea should be accompanied with actus rea or a guilty mind should also beaccompanied with the act of committing the crime otherwise it is no crime at all. The courtcannot try a person who has just thought of committing a crime nor have a mental state of thecommitment of a crime but mens rea should be supported by evidence from the prosecution.There are various levels of mens rea while the crime is committed for the prosecution anddefense and due to the different levels of crimes being committed these days making itcomplicated due to technological advancements, as new types of crimes are invented with every
Page 2
Preview Mode
This document has 4 pages. Sign in to access the full document!