The Path of the Law
An analysis of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.'s The Path of the Law, exploring his views on ontology, epistemology, axiology, and teleology, and comparing them with Karl Llewellyn’s legal realism to advocate for a more practical, evolving legal system.
Mason Bennett
Contributor
4.1
47
3 months ago
Preview (2 of 4)
Sign in to access the full document!
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
Krystal Ahlefeld
Government, Liberty University
GOVT 345: Jurisprudence
Professor: Benjamin Rathsam
June 06, 2025
The Path of the Law was presented by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr on January 08, 1897.
Holmes was an Associate Justice at the Massachusetts Supreme Court. He is a well-known
scholar, writer, and legal philosopher. In The Path of the Law, Holmes describes the nature of
Krystal Ahlefeld
Government, Liberty University
GOVT 345: Jurisprudence
Professor: Benjamin Rathsam
June 06, 2025
The Path of the Law was presented by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr on January 08, 1897.
Holmes was an Associate Justice at the Massachusetts Supreme Court. He is a well-known
scholar, writer, and legal philosopher. In The Path of the Law, Holmes describes the nature of
common law and also calls for a reconsideration of the structure of legal practices and education,
and judicial reasoning. The proceeding essay will analyze Holmes' ontology, epistemology,
axiology, and teleology. It will also discuss Llewellyn's nine-point manifesto of Legal Realism
found within "The Path of the Law" by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr at Boston University School of
Law back in 1897.
The definition of ontology is the philosophy which studies "existence".Ontology breaks
into four categories such as realism, empiricism, positivism and post-modernism. Each of these
are the brain's way of understanding, perceptions, and the brain's way of interpreting reality of
one's reality of the world around them. Holmes was a strong advocate of legal realism. His
interpretation was that the law should be based on reason and logic instead of moral standards or
abstract concepts. This is reinforced by his statement in his speech that states "When we study
law, we are not studying a mystery but a well-known profession (Holmes, 1897)." This would
suggest that he understood that the law should be embraced as a more natural law v. scientific.
Epistemology is defined as the philosophical "study or theory of the nature and grounds
of knowledge especially with reference to its limits and validity (Webster, 1856)". According to
Wacks's Understanding Jurisprudence , "Holmes firmly believed that legal developments could
be scientifically justified: the "true science of law", consist in the establishments of its postulates
from within upon accurately measure social desires instead of traditions." Holmes' epistemology
is that he believed that all law was literal interpretations that were scientifically justified.
Merriam-Webster defines axiology as "the study of the nature, types, and criteria of
values and of value judgements especially in ethics". The axiology of Holmes' is that "the bad
man is only going to obey the law due to them not wanting to deal with the consequences, jail
time or fines, that were to come from not obeying the law. The bad man isn't motivated to obey
the law due to having or maintaining a good conscience but he is only not breaking the law due
to the unfavorable outcome or punishments of breaking the law.
Lastly, the definition of teleology is " 1: a. the study of evidence of design in nature b.
Doctrine (as in vitalism) that ends is immanent in nature. C. a doctrine explaining phenomena by
and judicial reasoning. The proceeding essay will analyze Holmes' ontology, epistemology,
axiology, and teleology. It will also discuss Llewellyn's nine-point manifesto of Legal Realism
found within "The Path of the Law" by Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr at Boston University School of
Law back in 1897.
The definition of ontology is the philosophy which studies "existence".Ontology breaks
into four categories such as realism, empiricism, positivism and post-modernism. Each of these
are the brain's way of understanding, perceptions, and the brain's way of interpreting reality of
one's reality of the world around them. Holmes was a strong advocate of legal realism. His
interpretation was that the law should be based on reason and logic instead of moral standards or
abstract concepts. This is reinforced by his statement in his speech that states "When we study
law, we are not studying a mystery but a well-known profession (Holmes, 1897)." This would
suggest that he understood that the law should be embraced as a more natural law v. scientific.
Epistemology is defined as the philosophical "study or theory of the nature and grounds
of knowledge especially with reference to its limits and validity (Webster, 1856)". According to
Wacks's Understanding Jurisprudence , "Holmes firmly believed that legal developments could
be scientifically justified: the "true science of law", consist in the establishments of its postulates
from within upon accurately measure social desires instead of traditions." Holmes' epistemology
is that he believed that all law was literal interpretations that were scientifically justified.
Merriam-Webster defines axiology as "the study of the nature, types, and criteria of
values and of value judgements especially in ethics". The axiology of Holmes' is that "the bad
man is only going to obey the law due to them not wanting to deal with the consequences, jail
time or fines, that were to come from not obeying the law. The bad man isn't motivated to obey
the law due to having or maintaining a good conscience but he is only not breaking the law due
to the unfavorable outcome or punishments of breaking the law.
Lastly, the definition of teleology is " 1: a. the study of evidence of design in nature b.
Doctrine (as in vitalism) that ends is immanent in nature. C. a doctrine explaining phenomena by
Preview Mode
Sign in to access the full document!
100%