StudyXY
RegisterLog in

Q
QuestionLaw School Admission Test

When a litigation hold is received, management should ________ the notice to prevent early disposition until the litigation is resolved. a. Shred b. Destroy c. Preserve d. Ignore
3 days agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1
Let's solve this problem step by step:

Step 2
: Understand the Context

The problem is asking about the appropriate action when a litigation hold is received. A litigation hold is a legal directive that requires an organization to preserve all potentially relevant documents and electronic information.

Final Answer

Key Insight: Preserving evidence is a critical legal obligation that prevents potential accusations of spoliation (intentional destruction of evidence), which can result in severe legal consequences.

Need Help with Homework?

Stuck on a difficult problem? We've got you covered:

  • Post your question or upload an image
  • Get instant step-by-step solutions
  • Learn from our AI and community of students

Related Questions

Law School Admission Test

about 5 hours ago

How did the United States v. Windsor ruling change the legal definition of marriage? A. It resulted in the federal government recognizing all legal marriages performed in states. B. It supported the earlier Defense of Marriage Act. C. It required all states to perform same-sex marriage. D. It specified that couples legally married in certain states did have federal recognition of their marriage.

·
View Answer

Law School Admission Test

about 5 hours ago

Describe the conflict over the meaning of the Necessary and Proper Clause.

·
View Answer

Law School Admission Test

about 7 hours ago

"When the Supreme Court denies certiorari, it means the Court: A. is upholding the lower court ruling. B. believes the case lacks merit. C. finds the issue moot. D. takes no official position on the case."

·
View Answer

Law School Admission Test

about 7 hours ago

"What did the Supreme Court decide in Sweatt v. Painter? A. The order to segregate Texas graduate schools was constitutional. B. The order to desegregate Texas graduate schools was unconstitutional. C. The separate Texas law school for African American students was equal to the University of Texas Law School. D. The separate Texas law school for African American students was not equal to the University of Texas Law School."

·
View Answer

Law School Admission Test

about 10 hours ago

"The Court's decision in Regents v. Bakke is best described as: A. a compromise. B. a vote against racial quotas. C. a vote for racial quotas. D. a victory for medical students."

·
View Answer

Law School Admission Test

3 days ago

Which best explains the purpose of the Ninth Amendment? A. To ensure personal rights not stated. B. To prevent independent choices. C. To protect personal properties. D. To define specific personal rights.

·
View Answer