Which statement describes the ruling in Elonis v. United States (2015)? A. Posting song lyrics online is not a credible threat to public safety. B. Blogging about your personal anger toward certain people is criminal. C. Sharing improper images and texts is not a form of protected speech. D. Teaching other people how to evaluate an internet website is illegal.
5 months agoReport content

Answer

Full Solution Locked

Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.

Step 1
: Understand the case and the question

The case, Elonis v. United States (2015), deals with the issue of whether posting song lyrics online can be considered a "credible threat" to public safety. The case involves Anthony Elonis, who posted violent rap lyrics on Facebook, which led to his conviction under a federal threat statute.

Step 2
: Analyze the options given

A. Posting song lyrics online is not a credible threat to public safety. B. Blogging about your personal anger toward certain people is criminal. C. Sharing improper images and texts is not a form of protected speech. D. Teaching other people how to evaluate an internet website is illegal.

Final Answer

The correct statement that describes the ruling in Elonis v. United States (2015) is: A. Posting song lyrics online is not a credible threat to public safety.