ACC305 Final Exam: Leasing, Accounting Policies, and Financial Reporting

A final exam on leasing and financial reporting.

Olivia Smith
Contributor
4.3
49
about 1 month ago
Preview (3 of 7)
Sign in to access the full document!
ACC305 Final Exam: Leasing, Accounting Policies, and Financial Reporting
Strayer acc305 Final Exam Part 1

Question 1

Which of the following statements is true when comparing the accounting for leasing
transactions under U.S. GAAP with IFRS?

The IFRS leasing standard is the subject of over 30 interpretations since its issuance in 1982.

IFRS for leases is more "rules-based" than U.S. GAAP and includes many bright-line criteria to
determine ownership.

IFRS does not provide detailed guidance for leases of natural resources,sale-leasebacks, and
leveraged leases.

IFRS requires that companies provide a year-by-year breakout of future noncancelable lease
payments due in years 1 through 5.

Question 2

A lessor with a sales-type lease involving an unguaranteed residual value available to the lessor
at the end of the lease term will report sales revenue in the period of inception of the lease at
which of the following amounts?

The minimum lease payments plus the unguaranteed residual value.

The present value of the minimum lease payments.

The cost of the asset to the lessor, less the present value of any unguaranteed residual value.

The present value of the minimum lease payments plus the present value of the unguaranteed
residual value.

Question 3

Which of the following is an advantage of leasing?

Off-balance-sheet financing

Less costly financing

100% financing at fixed rates

All of these

Question 4

Which of the following is a correct statement of one of the capitalization criteria?

The minimum lease payments (excluding executory costs) equal or exceed 90% of the fair value
of the leased property.

The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessor.

The lease contains a purchase option.

The lease term is equal to or more than 75% of the estimated economic life of the leased
property.

Question 5

Hull Co. leased equipment to Riggs Company on May 1, 2013. At that time the collectibility of
the minimum lease payments was not reasonably predictable. The lease expires on May 1, 2014.
Riggs could have bought the equipment from Hull for $4,000,000 instead of leasing it. Hull's
accounting records showed a book value for the equipment on May 1, 2010, of $3,500,000.
Hull's depreciation on the equipment in 2013 was $450,000. During 2013, Riggs paid $900,000
in rentals to Hull for the 8-month period. Hull incurred maintenance and other related costs under
the terms of the lease of $80,000 in 2013. After the lease with Riggs expires, Hull will lease the
equipment to another company for two years.
Preview Mode

Sign in to access the full document!

100%

Study Now!

XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat

Document Details

University
Kaplan University School of Business and Management
Subject
Accounting

Related Documents

View all