Canadian Income Taxation : Planning And Decision Making, 2013-2014 Edition Solution Manual

Name: Canadian Income Taxation : Planning And Decision Making, 2013-2014 Edition Solution Manual
Brand: Academic Documents Platform
Price: 17 USD
Availability: InStock
Author: Olivia Smith

Canadian Income Taxation : Planning And Decision Making, 2013-2014 Edition Solution Manual provides expertly crafted summaries and insights to boost retention.

Olivia Smith

Contributor

4.4

4 months ago

Preview (16 of 894)

CHAPTER 1
TAXATION― ITS ROLE IN BUSINESS DECISION MAKING
Review Questions
1. If income tax is imposed after profits have been determined, why is taxation relevant to
business decision making?
2. Most business decisions involve the evaluation of alternative courses of action. For
example, a marketing manager may be responsible for choosing a strategy for establishing
sales in new geographical territories. Briefly explain how the tax factor can be an integral
part of this decision.
3. What are the fundamental variables of the income tax system that decision makers should
be familiar with so that they can apply tax issues to their areas of responsibility?
4. What is an “after-tax” approach to decision making?

Solutions to Review Questions
R1-1 Once profit is determined, the amount of income tax that results is determined by the Income
Tax Act. However, at all levels of management, alternative courses of action are evaluated
and decided upon. In many cases, the choice of one alternative over the other may affect
both the amount and the timing of future taxes on income generated from that activity.
Therefore, the person making those decisions has a direct input into future after-tax cash
flow. Obviously, decisions that reduce or postpone the payment of tax affect the ultimate
return on investment and, in turn, the value of the enterprise. Including the tax variable as a
part of the formal decision process will ultimately lead to improved after-tax cash flow.
R1-2 Expansion can be achieved in new geographic areas through direct selling, or by establishing
a formal presence in the new territory with a branch office or a separate corporation. The new
territories may also cross provincial or international boundaries. Provincial income tax rates
vary amongst the provinces. The amount of income that is subject to tax in the new province
will be different for each of the three alternatives mentioned above. For example, with direct
selling, none of the income is taxed in the new province, but with a separate corporation, all
of the income is taxed in the new province. Because the tax cost is different in each case,
taxation is a relevant part of the decision and must be included in any cost-benefit analysis
that compares the three alternatives [Reg. 400-402.1].
R1-3 A basic understanding of the following variables will significantly strengthen a decision
maker's ability to apply tax issues to their area of responsibility.
Types of Income - Employment, Business, Property, Capital gains
Taxable Entities - Individuals, Corporations, Trusts
Alternative Business - Corporation, Proprietorship, Partnership, Limited
Structures partnership, Joint ventures, Income trusts
Tax Jurisdictions - Federal, Provincial, Foreign
R1-4 All cash flow decisions, whether related to revenues, expenses, asset acquisitions or
divestitures, or debt and equity restructuring, will impact the amount and timing of the tax
cost. Therefore, cash flow exists only on an after tax basis, and, the tax impacts whether or
not the ultimate result of the decision is successful. An after-tax approach to decision-making
requires each decision-maker to think "after-tax" for every decision at the time the decision is
being made, and, to consider alternative courses of action to minimize the tax cost, in the
same way that decisions are made regarding other types of costs.
Failure to apply an after-tax approach at the time decisions are made may provide inaccurate
information for evaluation, and, result in a permanently inefficient tax structure.

CHAPTER 2
FUNDAMENTALS OF TAX PLANNING
Review Questions
1. “Tax planning and tax avoidance mean the same thing.” Is this statement true? Explain.
2. What distinguishes tax evasion from tax avoidance and tax planning?
3. Does the Canada Revenue Agency deal with all tax avoidance activities in the same way?
Explain.
4. The purpose of tax planning is to reduce or defer the tax costs associated with financial
transactions. What are the general types of tax planning activities? Briefly explain how each
of them may reduce or defer the tax cost.
5. “It is always better to pay tax later rather than sooner.” Is this statement true? Explain.
6. When corporate tax rates are 15% and tax rates for individuals are 40%, is it always better
for the individual to transfer his or her business to a corporation?
7. “As long as all of the income tax rules are known, a tax plan can be developed with
certainty.” Is this statement true? Explain.
8. What basic skills are required to develop a good tax plan?
9. An entrepreneur is developing a new business venture and is planning to raise equity capital
from individual investors. Her advisor indicates that the venture could be structured as a
corporation (i.e., shares are issued to the investors) or as a limited partnership (i.e.,
partnership units are sold). Both structures provide limited liability for the investors. Should
the entrepreneur consider the tax positions of the individual investors? Explain. Without
dealing with specific tax rules, what general tax factors should an investor consider before
making an investment?
10. What is a tax avoidance transaction?
11. “If a transaction (or a series of transactions) that results in a tax benefit was not undertaken
primarily for bona fide business, investment, or family purposes, the general anti-avoidance
rule will apply and eliminate the tax benefit.” Is this statement true? Explain.

Solutions to Review Questions
R2-1 There is a distinction between tax planning and tax avoidance. Tax planning is the process of
arranging financial transactions in a manner that reduces or defers the tax cost and that
arrangement is clearly provided for in the Income Tax Act or is not specifically prohibited. In
other words, the arrangement is chosen from a reasonably clear set of options within the Act.
In contrast, tax avoidance involves a transaction or series of transactions, the main purpose
of which is to avoid or reduce the tax otherwise payable. While each transaction in the
process may be legal by itself, the series of transactions cause a result that was not intended
by the tax system.
R2-2 Both tax planning and tax avoidance activities clearly present the full facts of each
transaction, allowing them to be scrutinized by CRA. In comparison, tax evasion involves
knowingly excluding or altering the facts with the intention to deceive. Failing to report an
amount of revenue when it is known to exist or deducting a false expense are examples of
tax evasion.
R2-3 CRA does not deal with all tax avoidance transactions in the same way. In general terms,
CRA attempts to divide tax avoidance transactions between those that are an abuse of the
tax system and those that are not. When an action is considered to be abusive, CRA will
attempt to deny the resulting benefits by applying one of the anti-avoidance rules in the
Income Tax Act.
R2-4 There are three general types of tax planning activities:
 Shifting income from one time period to another.
 Transferring income to another entity.
 Converting the nature of income from one type to another.
Shifting income to another time period can be a benefit if it results in a lower rate of tax
applying to the income. Even if a lower rate of tax is not achieved, a benefit may be gained
from delaying the payment of tax to a future time period.
Shifting income to an alternate taxpayer (for example, from an individual to a corporation), the
amount and timing of the tax may be beneficially altered.
There are several types of income within the tax system such as employment income,
business income, capital gains and so on. Each type of income is governed by a different set
of rules. For some types of income, the timing, the amount of income recognized, and the
effective tax rate is different from other types. By converting one type of income to another, a
benefit may be gained if the timing of income recognition, the amount recognized, and/or the
effective tax rate is favorable.
R2-5 The statement is not true. Paying tax later may be an advantage because it delays the tax
cost and frees up cash for other purposes. However, the delay may result in a higher rate of
tax in the future year compared to the current year. In such circumstances there is a trade off
between the timing of the tax and the amount of tax payable.
R2-6 There is not always an advantage to transfer income to a corporation when the corporate tax
rate is lower than that of the individual shareholder. While an immediate lower tax rate
results, remember that the corporation may be required to distribute some or all of its
after-tax income to the shareholder which causes a second level of tax. Whether or not an
advantage is achieved depends on the amount of that second level of tax and when it occurs.
Other factors may also be relevant such as the tax treatment of a possible business failure or
sale.

R2-7 The statement is not true. Knowing the tax rules is, of course, a major element in the tax
planning process, but, it does not guarantee the expected outcome. Planning means that
certain steps are taken now in preparation for certain activities that may occur in the future.
However, those anticipated activities might not occur and the desired tax result may not be
achieved. Tax planning also requires that one must anticipate and speculate on possible
future scenarios and relate them to the current tax planning steps. Those scenarios are never
certain.
R2-8 To develop a good tax plan, one must be able to:
 Understand the fundamentals of the income tax system.
 Anticipate the complete cycle of transactions.
 Develop optional methods of achieving the desired business result and analyze each of
their tax implications.
 Speculate on possible future scenarios and assess their likelihood.
 Measure the time value of money.
 Place the tax issue in perspective by applying common sense and sound business
judgement.
 Understand the tax position of other parties involved in the transaction.
R2-9 Yes, the entrepreneur should consider the tax position of the potential investors. They will be
taking a risk in accepting the investment. If the entrepreneur knows the tax effect on the
investors, of each alternative organization structure, the entrepreneur can choose the one
that provides investors the most favorable tax treatment (i.e., one that reduces their after-tax
loss if the investment fails, or increases their after-tax income if it succeeds). Before making
the investment the investor should determine the tax impact on:
 income earned by the venture,
 income distributed to the investor,
 losses incurred by the venture,
 the loss of the investment if the venture fails, and
 the gain on the investment when it is eventually sold.
R2-10 A tax avoidance transaction is a term used within the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) of
the Income Tax Act. An avoidance transaction is a transaction or series of transactions that
results in a tax benefit and was not undertaken primarily for bona fide business, investment or
family purposes [ITA 245].
R2-11 The statement is not true. In order for the tax benefit to be denied under the general anti-
avoidance rule (GAAR), the transaction, in addition to not being primarily for bona fide
business, investment or family purposes, must be considered to be a misuse or abuse of the
income tax system as a whole. What constitutes a misuse or abuse is not always clear.
However, certain avoidance transactions are permitted and others are not [ITA 245(3), IC 88-
2].
___________________________________________________________

Loading page 6...

Key Concept Questions
QUESTION ONE
The Income Tax Act contains a general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR) in section 245. Consider each
of the following situations and determine whether the GAAR will likely apply. Income tax reference:
ITA 245(1),(2),(3),(4); IC 88-2.
1. Chris transferred her consulting business to a corporation primarily to obtain the benefit of the
low corporate tax rate.
2. Paul owns 100% of the shares of P Ltd. Paul provides services to P Ltd. In the current year
he received no remuneration for his services because the payment of a salary to Paul would
increase the amount of the loss that P Ltd. will incur in the year.
3. A Canadian-controlled private corporation pays its shareholder/manager a bonus that will
reduce the corporation’s income to the amount eligible for the low tax rate. The bonus is not in
excess of a reasonable amount.
4. A profitable Canadian corporation has a wholly owned Canadian subsidiary that is sustaining
losses and needs additional capital to carry on its business. The subsidiary could borrow the
funds from its bank but could not obtain any tax saving in the current year by deducting the
interest expense due to its loss situation. Therefore, the parent corporation borrows the funds
from its bank and subscribes for additional common shares of the subsidiary. The parent
corporation reduces its taxable income by deducting the interest expense. The subsidiary
uses the funds to earn income from its business.
QUESTION TWO
John has owned all of the shares of Corporation A and Corporation B since their inception. In the
current year, John had Corporation A transfer, on a tax-deferred basis, property used in its business
to Corporation B. The reason for the transfer is to enable Corporation B to apply the income earned
on the transferred assets against its non-capital losses.
Will the GAAR in ITA 245(2) apply to disallow the tax benefit? Income tax reference: ITA
245(1),(2),(3),(4); IC 88-2.

Loading page 7...

Solutions to Key Concept Questions
KC 2-1
[ITA: 245(2) – GAAR]
The GAAR provision in ITA 245(2) is to be used when specific anti-avoidance provisions do not
suffice. For the GAAR to apply, the following four conditions must be met:
1) A tax benefit results from a transaction or part of a series of transactions [ITA 245(1) – “tax
benefit” definition],
2) The transaction is an avoidance transaction, in that, it was not undertaken primarily for
bona fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit [ITA 245(3) – “Avoidance
transaction” definition],
3) No other provision of the Act stops the taxpayer from achieving the intended tax
advantage, and
4) The transaction is an abusive transaction, in that, it can reasonably be concluded that the
tax benefit would result in a misuse or abuse of the Act, read as a whole [ITA 245(4)].
The transactions described in each of the four situations:
 A tax benefit results in each case,
 The transactions have been undertaken primarily to obtain a tax benefit and are, for
that reason, avoidance transactions, and
 Are not subject to any other anti-avoidance rule in the Act,
Therefore, the issue to be determined is whether the tax benefit would result in a misuse or abuse
of the Act, read as a whole.
Situation 1: There is nothing in the Act that prohibits Chris from incorporating her business. The
incorporation is consistent with the Act read as a whole and, therefore, the GAAR would not apply.
Situation 2: There is no provision in the Act requiring a salary to be paid to Paul and the failure to
pay a salary is, therefore, not contrary to the scheme of the Act read as a whole. The GAAR would
not apply to deem a salary to be paid by P Ltd. or received by Paul.
Situation 3: The Act recognizes the deductibility of reasonable business expenses which include
bonuses. The payment of the bonus is not an abusive transaction and, therefore, the GAAR should
not apply to the payment.
Situation 4: The borrowing by the parent corporation is for the purpose of gaining or producing
income as required by paragraph 20(1)(c) of the Act. The GAAR should, therefore, not apply. In
fact, CRA has indicated, in comfort letters, that where one corporation (A Ltd.) borrows from a
financial institution to invest in shares of another corporation (B Ltd.) and B Ltd. re-loans the funds
back to A Ltd. and charges interest at a reasonable rate, thus, shifting income from A Ltd. to B Ltd.,
the transactions are permissible and will not be challenged.

Loading page 8...

KC 2-2
[ITA: 245(2) – GAAR]
The GAAR provision in ITA 245(2) is to be used when specific anti-avoidance provisions do not
suffice. For the GAAR to apply, the following four conditions must be met:
1) A tax benefit results from a transaction or part of a series of transactions,
2) The transaction is an avoidance transaction, in that, it was not undertaken primarily for bona
fide purposes other than to obtain the tax benefit,
3) No other provision of the Act stops the taxpayer from achieving the intended tax advantage,
and
4) The transaction is an abusive transaction, in that, it can reasonably be concluded that the
tax benefit would result in a misuse or abuse of the Act, read as a whole.
In the case of John and his two corporations:
 The transaction does result in a tax benefit as using the losses will reduce tax,
 It appears that the transaction was undertaken primarily for the tax benefit, and
 There is no provision in the Income Tax Act prohibiting the transfer of the property on a tax-
deferred basis to a related corporation nor the deduction of the losses by Corporation B,
So, the question that remains is whether the transaction is an abusive transaction.
Since the Act contains specific provisions permitting the transfer of losses between related
corporations, the transfer in question is consistent with the scheme of the Act and, therefore, is not
an abusive transaction. Thus, the GAAR should not apply.
However, had the transfer of a property been undertaken to avoid a specific rule, such as a rule
designed to preclude the deduction of losses after the acquisition of control of a corporation by an
arm's length person, such a transfer would be a misuse of the provisions of the Act and be subject
to the GAAR [IC88-2].
Where the GAAR applies, the tax benefit that results from an avoidance transaction will be denied.
In order to determine the amount of the tax benefit that will be denied, the provision indicates that
the tax consequences of the transaction to a person will be determined as is reasonable in the
circumstances.

Loading page 9...

CHAPTER 3
LIABILITY FOR TAX, INCOME DETERMINATION, AND
ADMINISTRATION OF THE INCOME TAX SYSTEM
Review Questions
1. Which of the following entities are subject to income tax?
(a) proprietorship
(b) individual
(c) joint venture
(d) trust
(e) limited partnership
(f) corporation
(g) partnership
2. Describe how the income earned by any of the non-taxable entities listed above is
included in the Canadian tax system.
3. How and when does income earned by a corporation affect the tax position of an
individual who is a shareholder?
4. In describing who is liable for tax in Canada, the Income Tax Act simply states, “An
income tax shall be paid, as required by this Act, on the taxable income for each taxation
year of every person resident in Canada at any time in the year.” Accepting that “person”
includes both an individual and a corporation, briefly discuss the meaning and
ramifications of this statement.
5. In what circumstances are non-residents subject to Canadian income tax?
6. Can a Canadian resident be subject to tax in Canada as well as in a foreign country on
the same earned income? If yes, explain how. Also, what mechanism is available to
minimize double taxation?
7. Explain the difference between net income for tax purposes and taxable income for the
taxable entities.
8. Explain what is meant by the statutory scheme, and describe the scheme’s relevance to
the Canadian income tax system.
9. For tax purposes, would you prefer that a financial loss be a capital loss or a business
loss? Explain.
10. Explain the difference between income from property and a gain on the sale of capital
property.

Loading page 10...

11. One often hears that “corporations are entitled to more deductions for tax purposes than
individuals.” Based on your reading of Chapter 3, is this statement true? Explain.
12. If an individual earns a living as a lawyer, what possible categories of income, for tax
purposes, may he or she generate? Describe the circumstances for each possible
classification.
13. What types of income for tax purposes may result when a profit is achieved on the sale
of property (e.g., land)?
14. Individual A, a Canadian resident, owns and operates a profitable small farm in North
Dakota, U.S.A. He also has a large amount of money earning interest in an American
bank. Individual B, also a Canadian resident, owns 100% of the shares of an American
corporation that operates a profitable small farm in North Dakota. The corporation also
has a large amount of money earning interest in an American bank.
Describe and compare the tax positions of these two individuals who conduct the same
activities but use different organizational structures.
15. Jane Q owned an apple orchard for 20 years. During that time, she had cultivated a
unique brand of apple that was popular with health food fans. Toward the end of the
20X0 growing season, Q became seriously ill and put the orchard up for sale. Q’s
neighbour agreed to purchase the entire orchard for $250,000. It upset Q to have to sell
at that time of year because that year’s crop was of high quality and in three weeks
would have been ripe for picking.
What types of property might have been included in the total purchase price of
$250,000? For tax purposes, what types of income might have been generated from the
sale of the orchard? Explain your answer.

Loading page 11...

Solutions to Review Questions
R3-1 Of the seven entities listed the following are subject to tax:
 individuals
 corporations
 trusts
R3-2 Proprietorships, partnerships, joint ventures and limited partnerships can all earn income
as separate entities. However, for tax purposes the income is allocated annually to the
owners of the entities and included in their income for tax purposes. The owners are
normally one of the taxable entities, individuals, corporations or trusts.
R3-3 A corporation is a separate legal entity distinct from its owners - the shareholders.
Consequently a corporation is taxed on its income earned in each taxation year. However,
the after-tax corporate profits may be distributed as a dividend to the individual
shareholder. Upon receipt of the dividend the individual shareholder has earned property
income (return on the share capital) and is subject to tax consequences at that time [ITA
12(1)(j),(k)].
Alternatively, if the corporation does not distribute the after-tax profits but retains them for
corporate use, the value of the shares owned by the shareholder will increase in value. If
and when the shareholder disposes of the shares a capital gain may result due to the
increased share value caused by the corporate earnings retained [ITA 40(1)(a)(i)].
R3-4 This statement is important because it establishes the basic framework of the income tax
system, who is liable for tax, and on what income. The statement indicates that tax is
calculated on the taxable income of resident persons for each taxation year. By defining
each of the relevant terms in the statement the general scope of the tax system is
apparent. It is, therefore, necessary to define the terms person, resident, taxable income,
and taxation year [ITA 2(1)].
As stated in the question, both individuals and corporations are considered to be persons
for tax purposes. Therefore, resident individuals and resident corporations are liable for
Canadian tax [ITA 248(1)].
Individuals are resident of Canada if they maintain a continuing state of relationship with
the country. Whether or not an individual has a continuing state of relationship is a
question of fact determined from the facts of each situation. To establish this relationship
the courts consider the time spent in Canada, motives for being present or absent, the
maintenance of a dwelling place, the origin and background of the individual, the routine
of life, and the existence of social and financial connections. If an individual does not have
a continuing state of relationship, the individual may be deemed to be a resident if the
individual is present in Canada for 183 days or more in a particular year [ITA 250(1)(a)].
A corporation is a resident of Canada if it has been incorporated in Canada [ITA 250(4)].

Loading page 12...

Taxable income is defined as the person's net income for tax purposes minus a limited
number of deductions. Net income for tax purposes consists of world income derived from
five specific sources: employment, business, property, capital gains, and other sources.
These sources are combined in a basic formula known as the statutory scheme. If income
does not fit one of the above five categories, it is not taxable. Both individuals and
corporations determine net income for tax purposes using the same set of rules.
Tax is calculated on taxable income for each taxation year. The taxation year of an
individual is the calendar year. The taxation year for a corporation is the fiscal period
chosen by the corporation, which cannot exceed one year, 53 weeks to be exact [ITA
249(1), 249.1(1)]. Professional corporations (a corporation that carries on the
professional practice of an accountant, dentist, lawyer, medical doctor, veterinarian or
chiropractor [ITA 248(1)]) are required to have a fiscal period that coincides with the
calendar year [ITA 249.1(1)(b)].
R3-5 A non-resident individual or corporation is subject to Canadian income tax in a manner
similar to a Canadian resident on taxable income earned in Canada if they are employed
in Canada, carry on business in Canada, or dispose of taxable Canadian property [ITA
2(3)].
In addition, a non-resident who does not have any of the above activities in Canada may
be subject to a special withholding tax (a flat tax) on income which has its source in
Canada [ITA 212]. (For example, dividends, rents royalties, certain management fees,
and so on.)
R3-6 Yes. The resident of Canada is taxed on world income and the foreign country, which is
the source of that income, may also impose tax. For example, a Canadian corporation
which operates a business branch location in a foreign country will be taxable on the
branch profits in both countries. In order to avoid double taxation, the Canadian tax
calculation permits a reduction of Canadian taxes for foreign taxes paid on the same
income [ITA 126(1), (2)].
R3-7 Net income for tax purposes consists of a taxpayer’s combined net income from
employment, business, property, capital gains and other sources. The separate sources
of income are combined in accordance with an aggregating formula which takes into
account any losses from the above sources. Net income for tax purposes is determined
by the same set of rules for individuals and corporations.
Taxable income is the base amount upon which the rates of tax are applied, and is
determined by reducing a taxpayer's net income for tax purposes (above) by a limited
number of specific deductions. While individuals and corporations use the same formula
for determining net income, the calculation of taxable income is different. Deductions for
individuals include a capital gains deduction on qualified properties, and unused losses of
other years. Deductions for corporations include charitable donations, dividends from
Canadian corporations and foreign affiliates, and unused losses of other years.

Loading page 13...

R3-8 The statutory scheme is the fundamental base of the income tax system. It is simply an
aggregating formula which establishes the concept of a taxpayer's income for tax
purposes in comparison to other concepts of income. The formula defines what types of
income are subject to tax and how any related losses affect a taxpayer's income. As the
formula is restricted to five basic types of income activities, the scope of the tax system is
established. The formula establishes that, although a taxpayer may carry on several
separate activities, each separate type of income is not taxed separately but rather forms
part of a total concept of income. As a result, with the exception of capital losses, a loss
from one activity within a specified time period may be offset against the income derived
from other activities.
In spite of the fact that the formula combines several types of income into a single income
amount, each type of income is determined in accordance with its own sets of rules. The
formula then binds them together and establishes their relationships.
R3-9 A taxpayer would normally prefer that a loss incurred be a business loss as opposed to a
capital loss. In accordance with the aggregating formula for computing net income, a
business loss can be deducted from any other source of income which increases the
opportunity to reduce taxes payable as soon as possible. A capital loss, on the other
hand, can only be deducted against a capital gain and, therefore, its ability to reduce
taxes payable is considerably restricted. In addition, only one-half of a capital loss is
included as part of the aggregating formula [ITA 3(b)].
For example, a taxpayer who has employment income of $30,000 and a business loss of
$30,000 has no net income under the aggregating formula and, therefore, no tax liability.
However, if the same taxpayer has employment income of $30,000 and a capital loss of
$30,000, a tax liability would be incurred because the net income for tax purposes would
be $30,000 (from employment) and the capital loss would remain unused.
R3-10 Income from property is the return that is earned on invested capital. For example,
dividends earned on shares of a corporation are property income because they represent
the return from the ownership of capital property (the shares). On the other hand, a gain
derived from the sale of capital property is considered to be a capital gain. Using the
previous example, if the shares were sold at a profit the gain from that property would be
a capital gain and not property income.
R3-11 Based on the determination of net income for tax purposes, the statement is not true.
Both individuals and corporations determine net income for tax purposes in accordance
with the same aggregating formula. In addition, an individual who earns business income
determines that income in accordance with the same set of rules as a corporation that
earns business income.
With respect to the conversion of net income for tax purposes to taxable income,
individuals are entitled to a capital gains deduction whereas a corporation is not. In this
context an individual receives preferential treatment. In arriving at taxable income, a
corporation can reduce its net income by dividends received from other Canadian
corporations, whereas, individuals cannot. However, corporate income is ultimately

Loading page 14...

distributed to shareholders who are individuals and, therefore, this corporate advantage is
temporary [ITA 110.6, 112(1)].
R3-12 Working as a lawyer, an individual may earn either employment income or business
income. If the lawyer provides services to a law firm as an employee in return for a salary,
bonus, and fringe benefits, the income would constitute employment income. If the lawyer
independently provides services directly to clients on a fee-for-service basis, the income
derived is business income [ITA 5(1), 9(1)].
R3-13 A profit derived from the sale of property may be classified as either business income or
capital gain. Using the example of property that is land, business income will occur if the
land was acquired for the purpose of reselling it at a profit. Alternatively, if the land was
acquired, not for resale, but for long term use to generate income or for personal
enjoyment, the profit on the sale will be a capital gain.
R3-14 All Canadian residents are taxed on their world income. The world income of individual A
includes the business profits from the U.S. farm plus the interest earned from the U.S.
bank account. These amounts are, therefore, taxable in Canada in the year earned. The
income would also be taxable in the U.S. but Canadian taxes may be reduced by U.S.
taxes on that income.
In comparison, individual B's world income does not include the U.S. farm profits and the
U.S. interest. This income belongs to the U.S. corporation and is, therefore, taxed only in
the U.S. The foreign corporation is not a resident of Canada and is not subject to
Canadian tax. The after-tax profits of the foreign corporation may be distributed to
individual B in the form of dividends at some future time. Such foreign dividends would
then be part of B's world income and taxed a second time.
Although both A and B conduct the same activities, the organization structure alters the
amount and the timing of the related taxes on the income.
R3-15 The sale of the entire orchard for a total price of $250,000 may include the following
separate properties:
 land
 the permanent stock of trees
 the almost mature crop of apples
(The student may also recognize the possibility of including equipment and the intangible
property of goodwill.)
The sale of the land may result in a capital gain because it is property that was acquired
and used to generate income. Similarly the sale of the trees is capital property because
the trees are used to produce a regular crop of apples.

Loading page 15...

Loading page 16...

13 more pages available. Scroll down to load them.

Preview Mode

100%

Study Now!

XY-Copilot AI

Unlimited Access

Secure Payment

Instant Access

24/7 Support

Document Chat

Document Details

Subject

Taxation

Canadian Income Taxation : Planning And Decision Making, 2013-2014 Edition Solution Manual

Study Now!

Document Details

Related Documents

Canadian Income Taxation 2017/, 2017/, 2017/2018 Edition Solution Manual

Solution Manual for Canadian Income Taxation 2019/2020 , 22nd Edition

Canadian Income Taxation 2016/2017 Edition Test Bank

Canadian Income Taxation : Planning And Decision Making, 2013-2014 Edition Test Bank

Canadian Income Taxation 2016/2017 Edition Solution Manual

Exploring International Taxation Benefits and Strategies for U.S. Corporations

The Impact of IRC Section 199 and Related Corporate Tax Provisions on U.S. Businesses

Analyzing Tax-Exempt Status: Requirements and Case Study of Mutual Insurance Companies

Corporate Taxation: Charitable Contributions, Accounting Methods, and Taxable Income Calculations

Pearson�s Federal Taxation 2020 Comprehensive 33rd Edition Test Bank

Company

Explore

Study Tools