Examining Expert Reviewer Criteria and Film Evalua

This content analyzes how reviewers like Michiko Kakutani and Caelia Marshall evaluate works, focusing on credibility, bias, context, and personal criteria in reviewing literature and film.

Mason Bennett
Contributor
4.6
33
4 months ago
Preview (1 of 2 Pages)
100%
Purchase to unlock

Page 1

Examining Expert Reviewer Criteria and Film Evalua - Page 1 preview image

Loading page image...

1. How does Michiko Kakutani establish her credibility as a reviewer? In what ways does shedemonstrate her knowledge of the subject she is reviewing?Michiko Kakutani is an author she keeps this air of mystery which is why she is in the eyes ofother authors and publishers. She is very dear and subtle, and she tells her opinion how it is. andshe refers to different things to make her more credible.2.VTiat evaluation criteria does Michiko Kakutani use to review a work?She doesn't use a formula or template, she reads as a reader, and she reads books as a reader tofurther her knowledge and understanding of that book and state what she liked or disliked andgave examples. Her evaluation criteria were never "clear-cut", they were more implied ratherthan obvious.3. How dees Michiko Kakutani avoid appearing biased? Do you think she is successful in herattempts?I think she is successful in her attempts because she is a well-respected critic, she doesn't makeanything biased because she informs the people about why she favors this more and why shedoesn't like that as much and gives you credible things as to why s he had to say what she said.4. How would you respond to a writer who ±ought you reviewed their work unfairly?I personally think if a reviewer of a writer's work I would state my honest opinion. If theythought; it was unfair then ±ey can ask me why and Ell give them a further in-detailedexplanation. However, people will hate you because you didn't do am"thing in their favor but ifthev-can't take a critics honest opinion in a good way then that on the writer not me. My honestopinion would be to help the reader succeed not fail.TA1.Vhat criteria does Caelia Marshall use to evaluate the films she reviews in her essay?She uses the traditional film-review criteria, but she focuses on the historical and social contextof the film.2.How dees Marshall provide background and context behind the films Rear Window and BlackPanther?She provides primary and secondary sources to her judgement, at the beginning she provides athesis while grabbing her audience's attention.. She provides real world examples from differentsources to give the audience more context and background.3. Why has Marshall chosen to focus on criteria other than those listed in Figure 7.3? Do youthink her choice is effective? Why or why not?Her choice is effective because she focuses on what's important to her and her company. Shedoesn't focus on the criteria in 7.3 because she does not think it is important.
Preview Mode

This document has 2 pages. Sign in to access the full document!

Study Now!

XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat

Document Details

Subject
Art

Related Documents

View all