The Role of Non-State Actors in Shaping Foreign Policy: Analyzing Their Influence on Terrorism, Trade, and International Relations

This document examines the impact of non-state actors on foreign policy, terrorism, and international trade.

Ethan Wilson
Contributor
5.0
32
4 months ago
Preview (2 of 3)
Sign in to access the full document!
The Role of Non-State Actors in Shaping Foreign Policy: Analyzing Their
Influence on Terrorism, Trade, and International Relations
"Non-State Roles" Please respond to the following:
From the second e-Activity, examine the overall roles of the Non-State participants within a
current event that requires a foreign policy on terrorism to be developed. Provide a rationale
for your response.
Since the closing of the 19th century the middle class has emerged into the largest class in our
society. With the four previously discussed policies, or ideals in place, the middle class would
improve and become stronger, which it has. Otherwise, without protection of U.S. foreign
policy, our nation’s economy and power would deflate, sinking the middle class to becoming a
poor working class. Fortunately, our nation’s leaders sought to protect and uphold foreign policy
throughout the decades, and as a result turned our society into one built on the foundations of
the middle class. Emphasizing diligence in work and in savings, daily life lived on a strong moral
basis, and education as the key to economic success, which has emerged into the cornerstone of
the U.S. and its people throughout the twentieth century.
President Obama has committed himself and his Administration from the beginning of his
presidency to a foreign policy that ensures the safety of the American people. But he also
refuses the false division between our values and our security; the United States can be true to
our values and ideals while also protecting the American people. We will use all elements of
American power to achieve objectives, and consult closely with the Congress so that our policies
may have the broad and bipartisan support that makes them most effective. Finally, while there
are instances and individuals who can be met only by force, the United States will be prepared
to listen to and talk with our adversaries in order to advance our interests.
Refocusing on the Threat from al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan
Following an intensive 60-day interagency review, on March 27, 2009, the President announced
a new strategy with a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda in
Pakistan and Afghanistan, and to prevent their return to either country in the future. The
strategy is comprehensive and flexible and will need to be fully resourced. In addition to the
new troops the President has chosen to deploy, the strategy calls for significantly more
resources to the civilian effort and frequent evaluations of our progress.
Responsibly Ending the War in Iraq
On February 27, 2009, President Obama announced a plan to responsibly end the war in Iraq.
By August 31, 2010, our combat mission in Iraq will end and Iraqi Security Forces will have full
responsibility for major combat missions. After August 31, 2010, the mission of United States
forces in Iraq will fundamentally change. Our forces will have three tasks: train, equip, and
advise the Iraqi Security Forces; conduct targeted counterterrorism operations; and provide
force protection for military and civilian personnel. The President intends to keep our
commitment under the Status of Forces Agreement to remove all of our troops from Iraq by the
end of 2011.
Preview Mode

Sign in to access the full document!

100%

Study Now!

XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat

Document Details

Related Documents

View all