IB Psychology HL - BLOA - Discuss 2 Effects of Environment on Physiological Processes
The brain is a dynamic system that continuously interacts with the environment. It not only controls and adapts behavior but can also be reshaped by experiences and surroundings—a process known as neuroplasticity.
brain
dynamic system that interacts with the environment
the brain can determine and change its own behaviour
behaviour and environment can also change the brain
neuroplasticity
Key Terms
brain
dynamic system that interacts with the environment
the brain can determine and change its own behaviour
behaviour and environment can a...
effect of parental nurturing on brain
nurturing environment increases size of hippocampus (Luby, 2012)
enriched environment increases thickness of cerebral cortex (Rosenzweig and ...
Luby (2012) - Aim
To investigate the effects nurturing mothers have on the brain development of their children
Luby (2012) - Method
Experiment conducted with 92 mother-and-child pairs, with children aged 3-6 years
They were left with a brightly-wrapped package that was not...
Luby (2012) - Findings
children with nurturing mothers had hippocampi 10% larger than children with non-nurturing mothers
Luby (2012) - Conclusion
nurturing mothers had a positive impact on the brain development of children
Related Flashcard Decks
Study Tips
- Press F to enter focus mode for distraction-free studying
- Review cards regularly to improve retention
- Try to recall the answer before flipping the card
- Share this deck with friends to study together
Term | Definition |
---|---|
brain | dynamic system that interacts with the environment the brain can determine and change its own behaviour behaviour and environment can also change the brain neuroplasticity |
effect of parental nurturing on brain | nurturing environment increases size of hippocampus (Luby, 2012) enriched environment increases thickness of cerebral cortex (Rosenzweig and Bennett, 1972) |
Luby (2012) - Aim | To investigate the effects nurturing mothers have on the brain development of their children |
Luby (2012) - Method | Experiment conducted with 92 mother-and-child pairs, with children aged 3-6 years They were left with a brightly-wrapped package that was not allowed to be opened until the mother finished filling out some forms; this was meant to copy the usual stressors of daily parenting Generally either one of the two things was observed: - nurturing: mothers offered reassurance and support - non-nurturing: mothers ignored/scolded the child Researchers then divided them into two categories (participants were unaware of this) When the children were 7-10 years old, researchers used MRI to scan their brains |
Luby (2012) - Findings | children with nurturing mothers had hippocampi 10% larger than children with non-nurturing mothers |
Luby (2012) - Conclusion | nurturing mothers had a positive impact on the brain development of children |
Luby (2012) - Evaluation | not all variables controlled non-nurturing mothers may feed their child healthily the diet may impact brain development as well |
Rosenzweig and Bennett (1972) - Aim | to investigate the effect of either enrichment or deprivation on the development of neurons in the cerebral cortex |
Rosenzweig and Bennett (1972) - Process | Placed rats in one of 2 conditions: - environmentally enriched (e.g. giving interesting toys to play with) - environmentally deprived (e.g. no interesting toys to play with) Rats spent 60 days in their respective environments before being dissected The thickness of each rat’s frontal cortex was measured |
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Findings | post-mortem studies showed that rats in the enriched condition had increased thickness in cerebral cortex the frontal lobe is associated with thinking, planning, and decision-making it was found to be heavier in enriched condition rats |
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Conclusion | evidence of neuroplasticity due to environmental conditions having interesting toys created the best conditions for developing cerebral thickness of rat brains |
Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972) - Evaluation | tightly controlled study with defined IV/DV animal study; caution should be used when generalizing to humans ethically followed the correct guidelines for treatment of animals rats were bred for experimental purposes and were used sparingly |
neuroplasticity | the brain’s ability to rearrange the connections between its neurons i.e. redistribute brain mass according to usage/necessity result of learning or experience |
why does neuroplasticity occur? | the brain is a dynamic system that interacts with the environment so the brain can both affect and be affected by behaviour and the environment Luby (2012): hippocampus is associated with memory and emotion, and a nurturing environment likely correlates to positive emotions Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond (1972): cerebral cortex is associated with thinking, planning, decision-making, all of which were exercised over the 60 days general conclusion of the two studies: a nurturing and stimulating environment aids brain development |
what to write when asked “discuss 2 effects of environment on physiological processes” | define neuroplasticity describe + explain the effects of a nurturing (Luby, 2012) and stimulating (Rosenzweig, Bennet, and Diamond, 1972) environment on neuroplasticity include background info/reasons for every point explain why neuroplasticity occurs in the context of those environments discuss: give a balanced review with a focus on EXPLAINING EFFECTS rather than EVALUATIONS state your opinions and give evidence to support them evaluate all empirical evidence cited (e.g. methodology, ethnics, extent of generalization the results can have) discuss the usefulness of the findings: mention possible applications and how effective + universal these applications are |