QQuestionPhilosophy
QuestionPhilosophy
Are there any redeeming qualities to elitism and any downsides to pluralism? Are there benefits to having elites rule? Are there problems with allowing interest groups to exercise influence over government? Explain.
3 months agoReport content
Answer
Full Solution Locked
Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.
Step 1: Define elitism and pluralism.
Elitism is the belief that society should be led by a small group of individuals with superior abilities, intelligence, or knowledge. Pluralism, on the other hand, is the idea that a society is stronger when it is composed of diverse groups with varying interests, beliefs, and values, and that these groups should all have a voice in decision-making processes.
Step 2: Examine potential redeeming qualities of elitism.
- Efficiency: Elitism can lead to more efficient decision-making, as decisions are made by a smaller, more cohesive group. - Expertise: Elites may have greater expertise in certain areas, allowing them to make more informed decisions. - Stability: Elitism can provide a sense of stability, as the same group of individuals remains in power over time.
Final Answer
While elitism and pluralism each have their own redeeming qualities and downsides, a balance between the two may be necessary to create a just and functional society. Elitism can offer efficiency, expertise, and stability, but it often fails to represent the diverse needs and interests of the broader population. Pluralism ensures representation, fosters innovation, and promotes resilience, but it can also lead to conflict, inequality, and a lack of cohesion. Finding the right balance between these two approaches is crucial for creating a society that serves all its members fairly and effectively.
Need Help with Homework?
Stuck on a difficult problem? We've got you covered:
- Post your question or upload an image
- Get instant step-by-step solutions
- Learn from our AI and community of students