QQuestionBiology
QuestionBiology
"The farmer's experiment was widely considered to be well-designed and well-implemented. After 8 weeks, he found no difference between groups, and the berry harvest was still lower than in previous years. What can he conclude about his hypothesis?
A. Rodents are eating the berries.
B. Birds are eating the berries.
C. Birds are not eating the berries.
D. The results do not address the hypothesis."
4 months agoReport content
Answer
Full Solution Locked
Sign in to view the complete step-by-step solution and unlock all study resources.
Step 1: Examine the given information and the farmer's hypothesis.
The farmer conducted an experiment to determine whether birds or rodents were eating the berries. However, after 8 weeks, he found no difference between the groups, and the berry harvest was still lower than in previous years.
Step 2: Analyze the results of the experiment.
Since the farmer found no difference between the groups after 8 weeks, it suggests that neither birds nor rodents were the primary cause of the decreased berry harvest.
Final Answer
The most reasonable conclusion is option C: Birds are not eating the berries, as the results of the experiment do not indicate that birds or rodents were the main cause of the decreased berry harvest.
Need Help with Homework?
Stuck on a difficult problem? We've got you covered:
- Post your question or upload an image
- Get instant step-by-step solutions
- Learn from our AI and community of students