Chapter 2
12
constituencies, such as employees, suppliers, and residents of the communities in which
businesses are located, are not important in and of themselves.
Critical Legal Thinking: Volkswagen Emissions Scandal
In the early 2000s, Volkswagen produced a new diesel engine, but it was unable to develop one
that met United States environmental standards which limited the amount of nitrogen oxide
(NOx) pollution that an automobile could emit. In order to sell its new diesel cars in the United
States, Volkswagen built into their diesel cars a device and software that could detect when their
diesel automobiles were being tested by equipment of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA). The company’s automobiles were programmed to falsely indicate that their emissions met
EPA standards, when in fact Volkswagen’s diesel engines spewed NOx emissions 40 times
greater than permitted by law.
The U.S. government brought civil fraud and criminal charges against Volkswagen, and
consumers who purchased the affected vehicles—which could not be driven because they
violated emission standards—brought civil class action lawsuits against the company.
Volkswagen eventually agreed to pay $16 billion to settle the class action civil claims, and in a
2017 settlement reached with the U.S. government, Volkswagen pleaded guilty to 3 criminal
counts and agreed to pay $4.3 billion in civil and criminal fines. Six of the company’s executives
were criminally indicted for their participation in the deception.
Moral Minimum – This theory of social responsibility contends that a corporation’s duty is to
make a profit while avoiding causing harm to others. If a business avoids or corrects the social
injury it causes, it has met its duty of social responsibility.
Stakeholder Interest – Under this theory of social responsibility, a corporation must consider the
interests of all stakeholders, including stockholders, employees, suppliers, customers, creditors,
and the local community.
Global Law: Is the Outsourcing of U.S. Jobs to Foreign Countries Ethical?
U.S. companies often outsource the production of many goods that are eventually sold in the
United States, primarily because it is much less expensive to produce goods in foreign countries.
Usually, there are substantial labor cost savings abroad due to lower wages and lax workplace
regulations (for example, occupational safety, workers’ compensation, and fair labor standards
laws). This section questions whether it is ethical for U.S. companies to capitalize on foreign
workers who have few of the legal protections afforded workers in the United States.