Module 5- Assignment 1 The Case for or Against New Orleans
Assignment solution on New Orleans.
Charlotte Young
Contributor
4.3
54
2 days ago
Preview (4 of 13)
Sign in to access the full document!
A CASE FOR OR AGAINST NEW ORLEANS 1
Module 5- Assignment 1 The Case for or Against New Orleans
Sometimes one’s choices may involve catastrophic decisions and bear great risk and yet there can be no
clear answer. For example, if a person gets a divorce, shutters a plant, sells a losing investment, or
closes their business, will he or she be better off? The following case incorporates nearly all of the
material you have covered this far and presents an example of one such choice where nearly all of the
alternatives have a significant downside risk.
Review the following information from the article “A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the New Orleans Flood
Protection System” by Stéphane Hallegatte (2005):
Hallegatte, an environmentalist, assigns a probability (p) of a Katrina-like hurricane of 1/130 in his
cost-benefit analysis for flood protection. However, the levees that protect New Orleans also put
other regions at greater risk. You may assume the frequency of other floods is greater than Katrina-
like events (Vastag & Rein, 2011).
The new levees that were built in response to Katrina cost approximately fourteen billion dollars
(in 2010). This is in addition to the direct costs of Katrina (eighty-one billion dollars in 2005).
50 percent of New Orleans is at or below sea level.
A 100-year event means that there is a 63 percent chance that such an event will occur within a
100-year period.
Part A
Analyze the economics of New Orleans in light of the above parameters and develop your own
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) for rebuilding.
Evaluate the value of the CBA for each constituency and integrate these estimates into a
scenario model and/or decision tree. Analyze the results.
Clearly each of these constituencies may both overlap and be prey to a variety of group dynamics
internally. For one of these options, discuss the decision pitfalls to which they may be susceptible
and make a recommendation on how to alleviate these pressures.
Starting with your CBA, estimate the relevant expected utility for the interested constituencies.
Part B
Make a case for or against rebuilding the city of New Orleans. This should be an executive
summary be concise and brief. Include exhibits.
Whether you are for or against, discuss how social heuristics could be used to your advantage,
both ethically and unethically, in making your case. You may choose to fill the role
Write an 8–12-page report in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use
proper spelling and grammar throughout, and keep the text legible and balanced with visuals. Use
the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A1.docof one of the constituents, if
you prefer.
Module 5- Assignment 1 The Case for or Against New Orleans
Sometimes one’s choices may involve catastrophic decisions and bear great risk and yet there can be no
clear answer. For example, if a person gets a divorce, shutters a plant, sells a losing investment, or
closes their business, will he or she be better off? The following case incorporates nearly all of the
material you have covered this far and presents an example of one such choice where nearly all of the
alternatives have a significant downside risk.
Review the following information from the article “A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the New Orleans Flood
Protection System” by Stéphane Hallegatte (2005):
Hallegatte, an environmentalist, assigns a probability (p) of a Katrina-like hurricane of 1/130 in his
cost-benefit analysis for flood protection. However, the levees that protect New Orleans also put
other regions at greater risk. You may assume the frequency of other floods is greater than Katrina-
like events (Vastag & Rein, 2011).
The new levees that were built in response to Katrina cost approximately fourteen billion dollars
(in 2010). This is in addition to the direct costs of Katrina (eighty-one billion dollars in 2005).
50 percent of New Orleans is at or below sea level.
A 100-year event means that there is a 63 percent chance that such an event will occur within a
100-year period.
Part A
Analyze the economics of New Orleans in light of the above parameters and develop your own
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) for rebuilding.
Evaluate the value of the CBA for each constituency and integrate these estimates into a
scenario model and/or decision tree. Analyze the results.
Clearly each of these constituencies may both overlap and be prey to a variety of group dynamics
internally. For one of these options, discuss the decision pitfalls to which they may be susceptible
and make a recommendation on how to alleviate these pressures.
Starting with your CBA, estimate the relevant expected utility for the interested constituencies.
Part B
Make a case for or against rebuilding the city of New Orleans. This should be an executive
summary be concise and brief. Include exhibits.
Whether you are for or against, discuss how social heuristics could be used to your advantage,
both ethically and unethically, in making your case. You may choose to fill the role
Write an 8–12-page report in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use
proper spelling and grammar throughout, and keep the text legible and balanced with visuals. Use
the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M5_A1.docof one of the constituents, if
you prefer.
Preview Mode
Sign in to access the full document!
100%
Study Now!
XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat
Document Details
Subject
Sociology