Lecture Notes For Biopsychology, 9th Edition
Prepare for exams efficiently with Lecture Notes For Biopsychology, 9th Edition, offering detailed revision notes that focus on key concepts and chapters.
Alexander Wilson
Contributor
4.6
46
4 months ago
Preview (16 of 452)
Sign in to access the full document!
INSTRUCTOR’S MANUAL
Vincent Markowski
State University of New York at Geneseo
BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Ninth Edition
John P. J. Pinel
University of British Columbia
CLASS NOTES
Vincent Markowski
State University of New York at Geneseo
BIOPSYCHOLOGY
Ninth Edition
John P. J. Pinel
University of British Columbia
CLASS NOTES
1
1
Biopsychology as a Neuroscience:
What Is Biopsychology, Anyway?
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter-at-a-Glance 2
Teaching Objectives 3
Brief Chapter Outline 4
Teaching Outline 6
Lecture Launchers 13
Activities 16
Web Links 17
Author-run Blog 18
MyPsychLab 19
The Visual Brain 20
Accessing Instructor Resources 21
1
Biopsychology as a Neuroscience:
What Is Biopsychology, Anyway?
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter-at-a-Glance 2
Teaching Objectives 3
Brief Chapter Outline 4
Teaching Outline 6
Lecture Launchers 13
Activities 16
Web Links 17
Author-run Blog 18
MyPsychLab 19
The Visual Brain 20
Accessing Instructor Resources 21
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
2
CHAPTER-AT-A-GLANCE
Brief Outline
Instructor’s Manual
Resources
A Personal Introduction
Course Organization
Four Major Themes of This Text
(pp. 3–4)
Lecture Launcher 1.1
1.1 What Is Biopsychology? (p. 4) Lecture Launcher 1.7
1.2 What Is the Relationship between
Biopsychology and the Other
Disciplines of Neuroscience? (p. 4)
Lecture Launcher 1.2
1.3 What Types of Research
Characterize the Biopsychological
Approach? (pp. 4–8)
Lecture Launchers 1.3, 1.8
1.4 What Are the Divisions of
Biopsychology? (pp. 8–11)
1.5 Converging Operations: How Do
Biopsychologists Work Together?
(pp. 12–13)
Lecture Launcher 1.4
1.6 Scientific Inference: How Do
Biopsychologists Study the
Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
(pp. 13–14)
Lecture Launcher 1.5,
Activity 1.1
1.6 Critical Thinking about
Biopsychological Claims (pp. 14–17)
Lecture Launcher 1.6
< Return to Table of Contents
2
CHAPTER-AT-A-GLANCE
Brief Outline
Instructor’s Manual
Resources
A Personal Introduction
Course Organization
Four Major Themes of This Text
(pp. 3–4)
Lecture Launcher 1.1
1.1 What Is Biopsychology? (p. 4) Lecture Launcher 1.7
1.2 What Is the Relationship between
Biopsychology and the Other
Disciplines of Neuroscience? (p. 4)
Lecture Launcher 1.2
1.3 What Types of Research
Characterize the Biopsychological
Approach? (pp. 4–8)
Lecture Launchers 1.3, 1.8
1.4 What Are the Divisions of
Biopsychology? (pp. 8–11)
1.5 Converging Operations: How Do
Biopsychologists Work Together?
(pp. 12–13)
Lecture Launcher 1.4
1.6 Scientific Inference: How Do
Biopsychologists Study the
Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
(pp. 13–14)
Lecture Launcher 1.5,
Activity 1.1
1.6 Critical Thinking about
Biopsychological Claims (pp. 14–17)
Lecture Launcher 1.6
< Return to Table of Contents
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
3
TEACHING OBJECTIVES
After completion of this chapter, the student should be able to:
1. Describe the research goals for the field of biopsychology and its position within the larger field of
neuroscience.
2. Prepare to use basic research methods, terminology, and concepts (experimental design, independent
variable, etc.) and these terms in upcoming chapters.
3. Appreciate the value of converging operations across the six divisions of biopsychology.
4. Understand the value of research with animals and the ethical issues concerning their care.
< Return to Table of Contents
3
TEACHING OBJECTIVES
After completion of this chapter, the student should be able to:
1. Describe the research goals for the field of biopsychology and its position within the larger field of
neuroscience.
2. Prepare to use basic research methods, terminology, and concepts (experimental design, independent
variable, etc.) and these terms in upcoming chapters.
3. Appreciate the value of converging operations across the six divisions of biopsychology.
4. Understand the value of research with animals and the ethical issues concerning their care.
< Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
4
BRIEF CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. A Personal Introduction
a. Training and Teaching Experience
b. Research Experience
c. Teaching Assistant
d. Availability of Instructor and Teaching Assistant
2. Course Organization
a. Who Is the Course For?
b. Text and Ancillary Materials
c. Lecture Format
d. Examination Format
e. Major Assignments and Due Dates
f. Special Learning or Examination Requirements
g. Missed Examinations/Assignments Policy
h. Final Grades
Lecture Launcher 1.1: First Impressions of Biopsychology
3. The Four Major Themes of This Book
a. Thinking Creatively
b. Clinical Implications
c. The Evolutionary Perspective
d. Neuroplasticity
4. What Is Biopsychology?
a. Study of Biological Bases of Behavior
b. Characterized by an Eclectic Approach
Lecture Launcher 1.2: Biopsychology Research—More than White Rats and Lab Coats
5. What Is the Relation between Biopsychology and the Other Disciplines of Neuroscience?
a. What Is Neuroscience?
b. Biopsychology as a Part of Neuroscience
Lecture Launcher 1.3: Ethical Issues in Animal and Human Research
6. What Types of Research Characterize the Biopsychological Approach?
a. Human and Nonhuman Subjects
b. Experiments and Nonexperiments
c. Pure and Applied Research
7. What Are the Divisions of Biopsychology?
a. Physiological Psychology
b. Psychopharmacology
c. Neuropsychology
d. Cognitive Neuroscience
e. Psychophysiology
4
BRIEF CHAPTER OUTLINE
1. A Personal Introduction
a. Training and Teaching Experience
b. Research Experience
c. Teaching Assistant
d. Availability of Instructor and Teaching Assistant
2. Course Organization
a. Who Is the Course For?
b. Text and Ancillary Materials
c. Lecture Format
d. Examination Format
e. Major Assignments and Due Dates
f. Special Learning or Examination Requirements
g. Missed Examinations/Assignments Policy
h. Final Grades
Lecture Launcher 1.1: First Impressions of Biopsychology
3. The Four Major Themes of This Book
a. Thinking Creatively
b. Clinical Implications
c. The Evolutionary Perspective
d. Neuroplasticity
4. What Is Biopsychology?
a. Study of Biological Bases of Behavior
b. Characterized by an Eclectic Approach
Lecture Launcher 1.2: Biopsychology Research—More than White Rats and Lab Coats
5. What Is the Relation between Biopsychology and the Other Disciplines of Neuroscience?
a. What Is Neuroscience?
b. Biopsychology as a Part of Neuroscience
Lecture Launcher 1.3: Ethical Issues in Animal and Human Research
6. What Types of Research Characterize the Biopsychological Approach?
a. Human and Nonhuman Subjects
b. Experiments and Nonexperiments
c. Pure and Applied Research
7. What Are the Divisions of Biopsychology?
a. Physiological Psychology
b. Psychopharmacology
c. Neuropsychology
d. Cognitive Neuroscience
e. Psychophysiology
Loading page 6...
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
5
f. Comparative Psychology
Lecture Launcher 1.4: Neuropsychology’s Case Studies versus Physiological Psychology’s Experiments
8. Converging Operations: How Do Biopsychologists Work Together?
Lecture Launcher 1.5: Studying Brain and Behavior from All Sides
9. Scientific Inference: How Do Biopsychologists Study the Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
Activity 1.1: Making Sense of Eye Movements
10. Critical Thinking About Biopsychological Claims
a. Taming a Charging Bull with Caudate Stimulation
b. Prefrontal Lobotomy
Lecture Launcher 1.6: Chimpanzees and Mental Illness
11. End-of-Chapter Discussion
a. What Was Wrong with Delgado’s Claims?
b. What Was Wrong with Moniz’s Claims?
< Return to Table of Contents
5
f. Comparative Psychology
Lecture Launcher 1.4: Neuropsychology’s Case Studies versus Physiological Psychology’s Experiments
8. Converging Operations: How Do Biopsychologists Work Together?
Lecture Launcher 1.5: Studying Brain and Behavior from All Sides
9. Scientific Inference: How Do Biopsychologists Study the Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
Activity 1.1: Making Sense of Eye Movements
10. Critical Thinking About Biopsychological Claims
a. Taming a Charging Bull with Caudate Stimulation
b. Prefrontal Lobotomy
Lecture Launcher 1.6: Chimpanzees and Mental Illness
11. End-of-Chapter Discussion
a. What Was Wrong with Delgado’s Claims?
b. What Was Wrong with Moniz’s Claims?
< Return to Table of Contents
Loading page 7...
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
6
TEACHING OUTLINE
1. A Personal Introduction
Lend the course a personal perspective
a. Training and Teaching Experience
How I first became interested in biopsychology (personal anecdotes)
Undergraduate training
Graduate training
Postgraduate experience
Other courses that I am currently teaching
b. Research Experience
Thesis research
Past research
Current research interests (encourage students to speak with me about my work)
The following information should also be included in the syllabus:
c. Teaching Assistant (if possible, have the teaching assistant speak about himself/herself)
Training, current research interests
d. Availability of Instructor and Teaching Assistant
Office hours and location
Phone numbers/E-mail addresses/Web pages
2. Course Organization
a. Who Is the Course For?
Describe any prerequisites for the course (e.g., Introductory Psychology, Introductory Biology)
b. Text and Ancillary Materials (bring these to class so the students can see them)
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition, by John P.J. Pinel
Any other assigned reading materials
Note use of other pedagogical tools, such as a Blackboard site for the course
c. Lecture Format
Relation of lectures to text
Note if questions or comments are encouraged at any point in your lectures
If lecture notes are provided, note how they can be accessed
d. Examination Format
Examination dates
General format of exams (multiple choice, short answer, essay, and/or figure identification)
Nature of final exam (Is it comprehensive or for the last block of material?)
What to do if you think your examination has been graded incorrectly
6
TEACHING OUTLINE
1. A Personal Introduction
Lend the course a personal perspective
a. Training and Teaching Experience
How I first became interested in biopsychology (personal anecdotes)
Undergraduate training
Graduate training
Postgraduate experience
Other courses that I am currently teaching
b. Research Experience
Thesis research
Past research
Current research interests (encourage students to speak with me about my work)
The following information should also be included in the syllabus:
c. Teaching Assistant (if possible, have the teaching assistant speak about himself/herself)
Training, current research interests
d. Availability of Instructor and Teaching Assistant
Office hours and location
Phone numbers/E-mail addresses/Web pages
2. Course Organization
a. Who Is the Course For?
Describe any prerequisites for the course (e.g., Introductory Psychology, Introductory Biology)
b. Text and Ancillary Materials (bring these to class so the students can see them)
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition, by John P.J. Pinel
Any other assigned reading materials
Note use of other pedagogical tools, such as a Blackboard site for the course
c. Lecture Format
Relation of lectures to text
Note if questions or comments are encouraged at any point in your lectures
If lecture notes are provided, note how they can be accessed
d. Examination Format
Examination dates
General format of exams (multiple choice, short answer, essay, and/or figure identification)
Nature of final exam (Is it comprehensive or for the last block of material?)
What to do if you think your examination has been graded incorrectly
Loading page 8...
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
7
e. Major Assignments and Due Dates
What are they? When are they due?
f. Special Learning or Examination Requirements
Provide information about your institution’s learning resource center.
g. Missed Examinations/Assignments Policy
h. Final Grades
Tell students how the final grades will be computed.
3. The Four Major Themes of This Book
a. Thinking Creatively
• Novel approaches to research have led to progress in biopsychology
b. Clinical Implications
• Much has been learned through the investigation of brain damage and behavioral change
c. The Evolutionary Perspective
• Much has been learned by comparing and contrasting different species
d. Neuroplasticity
• The brain changes continuously throughout the life span
4. What Is Biopsychology?
a. Study of Biological Bases of Behavior
Brain and behavior are two of the most interesting subjects in science; biopsychology
focuses on brain/behavior relationships (refer to Figure 1.1, showing a human brain, from
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition).
Biopsychology emerged as a distinct area in psychology at the end of the nineteenth century;
Hebb’s The Organization of Behavior (1949) was a key factor in its development into a
major neuroscientific discipline.
Biopsychologists study how the brain and the rest of the nervous system determine what we
perceive, feel, think, say, and do.
This may be the ultimate challenge for the human brain: Does our brain have the capacity
to understand something as complex as itself?
b. Characterized by an Eclectic Approach
Biopsychologists use an eclectic combination of theories and research from many different
areas (e.g., psychology, biology, physiology, pharmacology, and anatomy) to better describe,
understand, and predict behavior.
This diverse approach is captured by the four main themes of Biopsychology: creative
thought about biopsychology; the clinical implications of biopsychology; evolution and
biopsychology; and neuroplasticity and biopsychology.
5. What Is the Relation between Biopsychology and the Other Disciplines of Neuroscience?
a. What Is Neuroscience?
7
e. Major Assignments and Due Dates
What are they? When are they due?
f. Special Learning or Examination Requirements
Provide information about your institution’s learning resource center.
g. Missed Examinations/Assignments Policy
h. Final Grades
Tell students how the final grades will be computed.
3. The Four Major Themes of This Book
a. Thinking Creatively
• Novel approaches to research have led to progress in biopsychology
b. Clinical Implications
• Much has been learned through the investigation of brain damage and behavioral change
c. The Evolutionary Perspective
• Much has been learned by comparing and contrasting different species
d. Neuroplasticity
• The brain changes continuously throughout the life span
4. What Is Biopsychology?
a. Study of Biological Bases of Behavior
Brain and behavior are two of the most interesting subjects in science; biopsychology
focuses on brain/behavior relationships (refer to Figure 1.1, showing a human brain, from
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition).
Biopsychology emerged as a distinct area in psychology at the end of the nineteenth century;
Hebb’s The Organization of Behavior (1949) was a key factor in its development into a
major neuroscientific discipline.
Biopsychologists study how the brain and the rest of the nervous system determine what we
perceive, feel, think, say, and do.
This may be the ultimate challenge for the human brain: Does our brain have the capacity
to understand something as complex as itself?
b. Characterized by an Eclectic Approach
Biopsychologists use an eclectic combination of theories and research from many different
areas (e.g., psychology, biology, physiology, pharmacology, and anatomy) to better describe,
understand, and predict behavior.
This diverse approach is captured by the four main themes of Biopsychology: creative
thought about biopsychology; the clinical implications of biopsychology; evolution and
biopsychology; and neuroplasticity and biopsychology.
5. What Is the Relation between Biopsychology and the Other Disciplines of Neuroscience?
a. What Is Neuroscience?
Loading page 9...
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
8
Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system; neuroscience includes many
different approaches, including neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry,
neuroendocrinology, neuropharmacology, and neuropathology.
b. Biopsychology as a Part of Neuroscience
Biopsychology is a discipline of neuroscience that integrates these various approaches.
Biopsychologists try to discover how the various phenomena studied by neurophysiologists,
neuropharmacologists, neuroanatomists, and other neuroscientists relate to one another to
produce psychological phenomena such as learning, memory, motivation, and perception.
Thus, biopsychology can be viewed as bridge between psychology and neuroscience.
The first part of the course will examine the fundamentals of neuroanatomy,
neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, genetics, and evolution; the rest of the course will
focus on how these biological fundamentals are applied to the study of biopsychological
phenomena.
6. What Types of Research Characterize the Biopsychological Approach?
Biopsychologists use a variety of research approaches in their studies; to understand what
biopsychology is, you must understand what biopsychologists do.
This diversity can be illustrated by discussing three dimensions along which biopsychological
research varies:
– human vs. nonhuman subjects
– experimental vs. nonexperimental studies
– applied vs. pure research
a. Human and Nonhuman Subjects
Advantages of human subjects:
They can follow directions.
They can report subjective experiences.
They are often less expensive.
They have a human brain.
Advantages of nonhuman subjects:
They have simpler nervous systems.
Studying various species makes it possible to use the comparative approach.
There are fewer ethical constraints (although the ethics of both human and animal research is
carefully scrutinized by independent committees).
b. Experiments and Nonexperiments
Biopsychology research can involve experimental and nonexperimental studies.
Experiments
Used by scientists to determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Usually a different group of subjects is tested under each treatment condition of an
experiment; this is a between-subjects design.
Sometimes the same group of subjects can be tested under multiple treatment conditions;
this is a within-subjects design.
Independent variables are set or manipulated by the experimenter; these manipulations
produce the different treatment conditions in an experiment.
Dependent variables reflect the subject’s behavior; this is what the experimenter measures.
8
Neuroscience is the scientific study of the nervous system; neuroscience includes many
different approaches, including neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry,
neuroendocrinology, neuropharmacology, and neuropathology.
b. Biopsychology as a Part of Neuroscience
Biopsychology is a discipline of neuroscience that integrates these various approaches.
Biopsychologists try to discover how the various phenomena studied by neurophysiologists,
neuropharmacologists, neuroanatomists, and other neuroscientists relate to one another to
produce psychological phenomena such as learning, memory, motivation, and perception.
Thus, biopsychology can be viewed as bridge between psychology and neuroscience.
The first part of the course will examine the fundamentals of neuroanatomy,
neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, genetics, and evolution; the rest of the course will
focus on how these biological fundamentals are applied to the study of biopsychological
phenomena.
6. What Types of Research Characterize the Biopsychological Approach?
Biopsychologists use a variety of research approaches in their studies; to understand what
biopsychology is, you must understand what biopsychologists do.
This diversity can be illustrated by discussing three dimensions along which biopsychological
research varies:
– human vs. nonhuman subjects
– experimental vs. nonexperimental studies
– applied vs. pure research
a. Human and Nonhuman Subjects
Advantages of human subjects:
They can follow directions.
They can report subjective experiences.
They are often less expensive.
They have a human brain.
Advantages of nonhuman subjects:
They have simpler nervous systems.
Studying various species makes it possible to use the comparative approach.
There are fewer ethical constraints (although the ethics of both human and animal research is
carefully scrutinized by independent committees).
b. Experiments and Nonexperiments
Biopsychology research can involve experimental and nonexperimental studies.
Experiments
Used by scientists to determine cause-and-effect relationships.
Usually a different group of subjects is tested under each treatment condition of an
experiment; this is a between-subjects design.
Sometimes the same group of subjects can be tested under multiple treatment conditions;
this is a within-subjects design.
Independent variables are set or manipulated by the experimenter; these manipulations
produce the different treatment conditions in an experiment.
Dependent variables reflect the subject’s behavior; this is what the experimenter measures.
Loading page 10...
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
9
The experimenter tries to conduct the experiment so that the independent variable is the only
thing that varies between each treatment condition; the experimenter measures the effect of
the independent variable on the dependent variable.
In a well-designed experiment, the experimenter can conclude that any differences in the
dependent variable between the various treatment conditions were caused by the independent
variable (it’s the only possibility).
Although the principle of good experimentation is conceptually simple, it is often difficult in
practice to make sure that there is only one difference among conditions; unintended
differences between conditions that can influence the dependent variable are called
confounded variables.
The presence of confounded variables makes experiments difficult to interpret because it is
impossible to tell how much of the effect on the dependent variable was caused by the
independent variable and how much was caused by the confounded variable.
An example of a well-designed experiment is the experiment of Lester and Gorzalka (1988)
on the Coolidge effect in female hamsters (refer to Figure 1.3 from Biopsychology).
Nonexperimental Studies
Sometimes it is impossible to conduct controlled experiments (e.g., if human subjects are
involved, it may be impossible for ethical or technical reasons to assign them to particular
conditions and to administer the conditions).
In a quasiexperimental design, researchers examine subjects in real-world situations who
have self-selected into specific conditions (e.g., excessive alcohol intake); in a sense, these
subjects have assigned themselves to treatment conditions.
The major shortcoming of a quasiexperimental study is that although researchers can examine
relations between the variables of interest (e.g., alcohol consumption’s relation to brain
damage), a quasiexperimental study cannot control for potential confounding variables.
Therefore, it does not allow a researcher to establish direct cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: Researchers cannot randomly assign humans to control and alcohol groups,
and then expose one group to 10 years of chronic alcohol exposure to see if
alcohol causes brain damage. Instead, they must compare the brains of
alcoholics and non-alcoholics found in the real world.
Key Problem: Because subjects in the real world do not assign themselves to groups
randomly, there are many other differences between the groups that could
contribute to differences in the dependent measures. For example, the
observation that alcoholics have far more brain damage than non-alcoholics
does not mean that alcohol directly causes this difference, because alcoholics
differ from non-alcoholics in many ways unrelated to their alcohol
consumption (e.g., education, accidental head injury, diet, other drug use).
Another type of nonexperimental design is called a case study.
Case studies are scientific studies that focus on a single subject; for example, you will learn
later in the course about how the in-depth study of one amnesic subject (H. M.) has
contributed much to our understanding of the neural basis of memory.
The main problem with case studies is their generalizability, or the extent to which their
results tell us something about the general population.
c. Pure and Applied Research
Pure and applied research are defined by the motivation of the researcher.
9
The experimenter tries to conduct the experiment so that the independent variable is the only
thing that varies between each treatment condition; the experimenter measures the effect of
the independent variable on the dependent variable.
In a well-designed experiment, the experimenter can conclude that any differences in the
dependent variable between the various treatment conditions were caused by the independent
variable (it’s the only possibility).
Although the principle of good experimentation is conceptually simple, it is often difficult in
practice to make sure that there is only one difference among conditions; unintended
differences between conditions that can influence the dependent variable are called
confounded variables.
The presence of confounded variables makes experiments difficult to interpret because it is
impossible to tell how much of the effect on the dependent variable was caused by the
independent variable and how much was caused by the confounded variable.
An example of a well-designed experiment is the experiment of Lester and Gorzalka (1988)
on the Coolidge effect in female hamsters (refer to Figure 1.3 from Biopsychology).
Nonexperimental Studies
Sometimes it is impossible to conduct controlled experiments (e.g., if human subjects are
involved, it may be impossible for ethical or technical reasons to assign them to particular
conditions and to administer the conditions).
In a quasiexperimental design, researchers examine subjects in real-world situations who
have self-selected into specific conditions (e.g., excessive alcohol intake); in a sense, these
subjects have assigned themselves to treatment conditions.
The major shortcoming of a quasiexperimental study is that although researchers can examine
relations between the variables of interest (e.g., alcohol consumption’s relation to brain
damage), a quasiexperimental study cannot control for potential confounding variables.
Therefore, it does not allow a researcher to establish direct cause-and-effect relationships.
Example: Researchers cannot randomly assign humans to control and alcohol groups,
and then expose one group to 10 years of chronic alcohol exposure to see if
alcohol causes brain damage. Instead, they must compare the brains of
alcoholics and non-alcoholics found in the real world.
Key Problem: Because subjects in the real world do not assign themselves to groups
randomly, there are many other differences between the groups that could
contribute to differences in the dependent measures. For example, the
observation that alcoholics have far more brain damage than non-alcoholics
does not mean that alcohol directly causes this difference, because alcoholics
differ from non-alcoholics in many ways unrelated to their alcohol
consumption (e.g., education, accidental head injury, diet, other drug use).
Another type of nonexperimental design is called a case study.
Case studies are scientific studies that focus on a single subject; for example, you will learn
later in the course about how the in-depth study of one amnesic subject (H. M.) has
contributed much to our understanding of the neural basis of memory.
The main problem with case studies is their generalizability, or the extent to which their
results tell us something about the general population.
c. Pure and Applied Research
Pure and applied research are defined by the motivation of the researcher.
Loading page 11...
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
10
Pure research is motivated primarily by the curiosity of the researcher to find out how things
work; pure research focuses on establishing building blocks or basic concepts that may
provide information salient to many problems.
Applied research is motivated by an attempt to directly use the building blocks of basic
research to answer specific questions; human and animal problems are directly addressed.
7. What Are the Divisions of Biopsychology?
a. Physiological Psychology
It focuses on direct manipulation of the nervous system in controlled lab settings (e.g.,
lesions, invasive recording).
The subjects are usually laboratory animals.
There is a strong focus on pure research.
b. Psychopharmacology
Similar to physiological psychology, except that the nervous system is manipulated
pharmacologically
Focuses on drug effects on behavior and how these changes are mediated by changes in
neural activity
Many psychopharmacologists favor pure research and use drugs to reveal the nature of
brain-behavior interactions, while others concentrate on applied questions (e.g., drug abuse,
therapeutic drugs)
c. Neuropsychology
Focuses on the behavioral effects of brain damage in humans, typically cortical damage
Cannot be studied in humans by experimentation; research focuses on case studies and
quasiexperimental studies
Most applied of the six divisions of biopsychology; neuropsychological tests of brain-
damaged patients facilitate diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle counseling (e.g., the case of Mr.
R. described in the text)
d. Psychophysiology
It focuses on the relationship between physiological and psychological processes in human
subjects.
Because human subjects are used, all brain recordings are noninvasive (i.e., from the surface
of the head).
The usual measure of brain activity is the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG).
Muscle tension, eye movement, heart rate, pupil dilation, and electrical conductance of the
skin are other common psychophysiological measures.
Example: Eyetracking deficits in schizophrenics; refer students to Figure 1.4 from
Biopsychology
e. Cognitive Neuroscience
Newest division of biopsychology
Focuses on the neural bases of cognitive processes like learning/memory, attention, and
perceptual processes
Often employs human subjects—key methods are noninvasive, functional brain imaging
techniques (refer students to Figure 1.5 from Biopsychology)
10
Pure research is motivated primarily by the curiosity of the researcher to find out how things
work; pure research focuses on establishing building blocks or basic concepts that may
provide information salient to many problems.
Applied research is motivated by an attempt to directly use the building blocks of basic
research to answer specific questions; human and animal problems are directly addressed.
7. What Are the Divisions of Biopsychology?
a. Physiological Psychology
It focuses on direct manipulation of the nervous system in controlled lab settings (e.g.,
lesions, invasive recording).
The subjects are usually laboratory animals.
There is a strong focus on pure research.
b. Psychopharmacology
Similar to physiological psychology, except that the nervous system is manipulated
pharmacologically
Focuses on drug effects on behavior and how these changes are mediated by changes in
neural activity
Many psychopharmacologists favor pure research and use drugs to reveal the nature of
brain-behavior interactions, while others concentrate on applied questions (e.g., drug abuse,
therapeutic drugs)
c. Neuropsychology
Focuses on the behavioral effects of brain damage in humans, typically cortical damage
Cannot be studied in humans by experimentation; research focuses on case studies and
quasiexperimental studies
Most applied of the six divisions of biopsychology; neuropsychological tests of brain-
damaged patients facilitate diagnosis, treatment, and lifestyle counseling (e.g., the case of Mr.
R. described in the text)
d. Psychophysiology
It focuses on the relationship between physiological and psychological processes in human
subjects.
Because human subjects are used, all brain recordings are noninvasive (i.e., from the surface
of the head).
The usual measure of brain activity is the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG).
Muscle tension, eye movement, heart rate, pupil dilation, and electrical conductance of the
skin are other common psychophysiological measures.
Example: Eyetracking deficits in schizophrenics; refer students to Figure 1.4 from
Biopsychology
e. Cognitive Neuroscience
Newest division of biopsychology
Focuses on the neural bases of cognitive processes like learning/memory, attention, and
perceptual processes
Often employs human subjects—key methods are noninvasive, functional brain imaging
techniques (refer students to Figure 1.5 from Biopsychology)
Loading page 12...
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
11
Often involves collaborations between researchers with widely different backgrounds (e.g.,
biopsychology, cognitive psychology, computer science)
f. Comparative Psychology
Focuses on the biology of behavior
Features comparative and functional approaches
Features laboratory research, as well as studies of animals in their natural environments
(ethology)
Includes disciplines of evolutionary psychology (understanding behavior through its
evolutionary origins) and behavioral genetics (understanding the genetic influences on
behavior)
8. Converging Operations: How Do Biopsychologists Work Together?
Each of the six approaches to biopsychological research is not without its weaknesses; thus,
biopsychological issues are rarely resolved by a single experiment or study, or by any single
approach.
Progress is greatest when several different approaches, each compensating for the
shortcomings of the others, are used to solve the same problems; this is called converging
operations.
9. Scientific Inference: How Do Biopsychologists Study the Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
Science is a method of answering questions by direct observation; it is an empirical method.
However, brain activity is not directly observable (e.g., one cannot see a neuron firing or
neurochemicals being released from neurons).
This situation is no different than other sciences (e.g., physicists cannot see gravity, chemists
cannot see evaporation); the effects of the processes are observable, but not the processes
themselves.
Question: How do scientists study the unobservable using a method (i.e., the scientific
method) that is fundamentally observational?
Answer: By scientific inference; scientists observe the consequences of unobservable
processes and from these they infer the nature of unobservable processes.
10. Critical Thinking about Biopsychological Claims
You might think it odd to begin a course on biopsychology by considering two bad examples of its
science. This is done for two reasons:
because disciplines learn from their mistakes; understanding biopsychology’s previous errors
help biopsychologists to avoid these mistakes in their own work; and
because it will make you a better consumer of scientific research—it will help you develop
critical thinking about biopsychological research.
a. Taming a Charging Bull with Caudate Stimulation
The biopsychologist Jose Delgado implanted an electrode into the caudate nucleus of a bull.
Each time the bull charged, Delgado used his hand-held transmitter to deliver an electrical
stimulation to the caudate nucleus of the bull via the implanted electrode.
This stopped the charge and after a few attempts, the bull stood tamely as Delgado strode
about the ring.
11
Often involves collaborations between researchers with widely different backgrounds (e.g.,
biopsychology, cognitive psychology, computer science)
f. Comparative Psychology
Focuses on the biology of behavior
Features comparative and functional approaches
Features laboratory research, as well as studies of animals in their natural environments
(ethology)
Includes disciplines of evolutionary psychology (understanding behavior through its
evolutionary origins) and behavioral genetics (understanding the genetic influences on
behavior)
8. Converging Operations: How Do Biopsychologists Work Together?
Each of the six approaches to biopsychological research is not without its weaknesses; thus,
biopsychological issues are rarely resolved by a single experiment or study, or by any single
approach.
Progress is greatest when several different approaches, each compensating for the
shortcomings of the others, are used to solve the same problems; this is called converging
operations.
9. Scientific Inference: How Do Biopsychologists Study the Unobservable Workings of the Brain?
Science is a method of answering questions by direct observation; it is an empirical method.
However, brain activity is not directly observable (e.g., one cannot see a neuron firing or
neurochemicals being released from neurons).
This situation is no different than other sciences (e.g., physicists cannot see gravity, chemists
cannot see evaporation); the effects of the processes are observable, but not the processes
themselves.
Question: How do scientists study the unobservable using a method (i.e., the scientific
method) that is fundamentally observational?
Answer: By scientific inference; scientists observe the consequences of unobservable
processes and from these they infer the nature of unobservable processes.
10. Critical Thinking about Biopsychological Claims
You might think it odd to begin a course on biopsychology by considering two bad examples of its
science. This is done for two reasons:
because disciplines learn from their mistakes; understanding biopsychology’s previous errors
help biopsychologists to avoid these mistakes in their own work; and
because it will make you a better consumer of scientific research—it will help you develop
critical thinking about biopsychological research.
a. Taming a Charging Bull with Caudate Stimulation
The biopsychologist Jose Delgado implanted an electrode into the caudate nucleus of a bull.
Each time the bull charged, Delgado used his hand-held transmitter to deliver an electrical
stimulation to the caudate nucleus of the bull via the implanted electrode.
This stopped the charge and after a few attempts, the bull stood tamely as Delgado strode
about the ring.
Loading page 13...
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
12
Delgado and the popular press declared this a major discovery, the discovery of the caudate
taming center. It was even suggested that caudate stimulation might cure human
psychopaths.
b. Prefrontal Lobotomy (use Figures 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 from Biopsychology)
In 1949, Dr. Egas Moniz received a Nobel Prize for developing a novel treatment for mental
illness: prefrontal lobotomy, a procedure that separates the prefrontal lobes from the rest of
the brain.
Moniz based his technique on a report that a chimpanzee (Becky) was easier to handle after
part of her prefrontal lobes had been destroyed as part of an experiment.
Various forms of the operation were devised, such as the transorbital lobotomy procedure,
which was performed by inserting an ice pick-like device through the eye sockets, often in a
doctor’s office.
Following the initial reports by Moniz of the operation’s benefits, it was performed on
mentally-ill patients all over the world (over 40,000 in the United States alone).
Note the case of Howard Dully, the boy who was lobotomized at the insistence of his
stepmother.
11. End-of-Chapter Discussion
Guide the discussion to the following points and issues:
a. What Was Wrong with Delgado’s Claims?
There are many ways that stimulation might stop a charging bull other than by taming it (e.g.,
the stimulation might have been painful, blinded the bull, made it sick, or made movement
difficult).
When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of a behavior, the general rule is to
favor the simplest one; this rule is called Morgan’s Canon.
In fact, analyses of the filmed record of this event strongly support a more simple
interpretation: The left and right caudate are motor structures, and stimulating one side often
causes an animal to walk in circles.
This appears to be what happened in Delgado’s case; the bull was confused and incapable of
charging, but not tamed.
b. What Was Wrong with Moniz’s Claims?
The surgery was based on the study of only one subject (Becky), and a nonhuman subject at
that!
It is difficult to see how one could conclude that an operation that would eliminate the
adaptive defensive reactions of a chimpanzee to an experimenter would help the mentally ill.
Moniz and others who prescribed prefrontal lobotomy were not in a position to be objective
in its evaluation, nor were they trained to perform such evaluations. Early reports of the
benefits of prefrontal lobotomy were based on poorly controlled studies focused on
manageability and published by Moniz himself.
After many thousands of people had been lobotomized, controlled studies by objective
researchers revealed terrible side effects (e.g., “vegetable-like behavior,” urinary
incontinence, epilepsy).
< Return to Table of Contents
12
Delgado and the popular press declared this a major discovery, the discovery of the caudate
taming center. It was even suggested that caudate stimulation might cure human
psychopaths.
b. Prefrontal Lobotomy (use Figures 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10 from Biopsychology)
In 1949, Dr. Egas Moniz received a Nobel Prize for developing a novel treatment for mental
illness: prefrontal lobotomy, a procedure that separates the prefrontal lobes from the rest of
the brain.
Moniz based his technique on a report that a chimpanzee (Becky) was easier to handle after
part of her prefrontal lobes had been destroyed as part of an experiment.
Various forms of the operation were devised, such as the transorbital lobotomy procedure,
which was performed by inserting an ice pick-like device through the eye sockets, often in a
doctor’s office.
Following the initial reports by Moniz of the operation’s benefits, it was performed on
mentally-ill patients all over the world (over 40,000 in the United States alone).
Note the case of Howard Dully, the boy who was lobotomized at the insistence of his
stepmother.
11. End-of-Chapter Discussion
Guide the discussion to the following points and issues:
a. What Was Wrong with Delgado’s Claims?
There are many ways that stimulation might stop a charging bull other than by taming it (e.g.,
the stimulation might have been painful, blinded the bull, made it sick, or made movement
difficult).
When there is more than one reasonable interpretation of a behavior, the general rule is to
favor the simplest one; this rule is called Morgan’s Canon.
In fact, analyses of the filmed record of this event strongly support a more simple
interpretation: The left and right caudate are motor structures, and stimulating one side often
causes an animal to walk in circles.
This appears to be what happened in Delgado’s case; the bull was confused and incapable of
charging, but not tamed.
b. What Was Wrong with Moniz’s Claims?
The surgery was based on the study of only one subject (Becky), and a nonhuman subject at
that!
It is difficult to see how one could conclude that an operation that would eliminate the
adaptive defensive reactions of a chimpanzee to an experimenter would help the mentally ill.
Moniz and others who prescribed prefrontal lobotomy were not in a position to be objective
in its evaluation, nor were they trained to perform such evaluations. Early reports of the
benefits of prefrontal lobotomy were based on poorly controlled studies focused on
manageability and published by Moniz himself.
After many thousands of people had been lobotomized, controlled studies by objective
researchers revealed terrible side effects (e.g., “vegetable-like behavior,” urinary
incontinence, epilepsy).
< Return to Table of Contents
Loading page 14...
Biopsychology, Ninth Edition
13
LECTURE LAUNCHERS
Lecture Launcher 1.1: First Impressions of Biopsychology
Based on their reading of Chapter 1, and on preconceptions that they may have from other psychology
classes, have your students discuss what THEY think biopsychology is—where it fits into psychology
and where it fits into science. For background material to help you with this discussion, see the Web
site for the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences at
http://www.bri.ucla.edu/nha/ishn/.
Lecture Launcher 1.2: Biopsychology Research—More Than White Rats and Lab Coats
Based upon lectures to this point, talk about another area of biopsychological inquiry in which
experiments, quasiexperimental studies, and case studies complement one another to make valuable
contributions to our understanding of brain/behavior relations (e.g., ask students to split into groups of
three to five students to discuss how these three methods for studying brain/behavior relations could be
used to study the neural bases of the behavioral changes that emerged following Phineas Gage’s
accident).
Lecture Launcher 1.3: Ethical Issues in Animal and Human Research
Biopsychology uses both human and nonhuman subjects, and there are different sorts of ethical issues
associated with the use of each. Discuss the procedure of applying for ethics approval in your university
or college. What are the factors that the ethics committees consider when determining whether or not to
approve a particular experiment? Also talk about what checks are in place in your country, state, or
province to protect human and animal subjects.
Web sites for responsible use of nonhuman animal research:
www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk
www.apa.org/science/leadership/care/guidelines.aspx
www.animalresearchforlife.eu
www.the-aps.org/pa/policy/animals/intro.htm
Web sites against the use of nonhuman animal research:
www.uncaged.co.uk
www.navs.org
www.stopanimaltests.com
Lecture Launcher 1.4: Neuropsychology’s Case Studies versus Physiological
Psychology’s Experiments
Neuropsychologists and physiological psychologists both study the effects of brain damage on their
subjects. However, they use dramatically different methodologies: Neuropsychologists typically use case
studies of human subjects, whereas physiological psychologists use experimental studies of nonhuman
subjects. Given that neuropsychology can collect data directly from human subjects, why is it necessary
to perform experiments on nonhuman subjects?
13
LECTURE LAUNCHERS
Lecture Launcher 1.1: First Impressions of Biopsychology
Based on their reading of Chapter 1, and on preconceptions that they may have from other psychology
classes, have your students discuss what THEY think biopsychology is—where it fits into psychology
and where it fits into science. For background material to help you with this discussion, see the Web
site for the International Society for the History of the Neurosciences at
http://www.bri.ucla.edu/nha/ishn/.
Lecture Launcher 1.2: Biopsychology Research—More Than White Rats and Lab Coats
Based upon lectures to this point, talk about another area of biopsychological inquiry in which
experiments, quasiexperimental studies, and case studies complement one another to make valuable
contributions to our understanding of brain/behavior relations (e.g., ask students to split into groups of
three to five students to discuss how these three methods for studying brain/behavior relations could be
used to study the neural bases of the behavioral changes that emerged following Phineas Gage’s
accident).
Lecture Launcher 1.3: Ethical Issues in Animal and Human Research
Biopsychology uses both human and nonhuman subjects, and there are different sorts of ethical issues
associated with the use of each. Discuss the procedure of applying for ethics approval in your university
or college. What are the factors that the ethics committees consider when determining whether or not to
approve a particular experiment? Also talk about what checks are in place in your country, state, or
province to protect human and animal subjects.
Web sites for responsible use of nonhuman animal research:
www.understandinganimalresearch.org.uk
www.apa.org/science/leadership/care/guidelines.aspx
www.animalresearchforlife.eu
www.the-aps.org/pa/policy/animals/intro.htm
Web sites against the use of nonhuman animal research:
www.uncaged.co.uk
www.navs.org
www.stopanimaltests.com
Lecture Launcher 1.4: Neuropsychology’s Case Studies versus Physiological
Psychology’s Experiments
Neuropsychologists and physiological psychologists both study the effects of brain damage on their
subjects. However, they use dramatically different methodologies: Neuropsychologists typically use case
studies of human subjects, whereas physiological psychologists use experimental studies of nonhuman
subjects. Given that neuropsychology can collect data directly from human subjects, why is it necessary
to perform experiments on nonhuman subjects?
Loading page 15...
Chapter 1: Biopsychology as a Neuroscience
14
Lecture Launcher 1.5: Studying the Brain and Behavior from All Sides
Consider the relative strengths and weakness of physiological psychology and neuropsychology.
Neuropsychology’s strength is that it deals with humans, but this is also its weakness because it precludes
experimentation. In contrast, physiological psychology can bring the power of the experimental method
and invasive neuroscientific techniques to bear on the question, but it is limited to the study of laboratory
animals.
Because the two approaches complement one another, together they can provide evidence for points of
view that neither can defend individually. Read about the case of Jimmie G. in Section 1.5 to see the
power of this approach in action.
Lecture Launcher 1.6: Chimpanzees and Mental Illness
In the analysis of Case 2 (Beck, Moniz, and Prefrontal Lobotomy), it was pointed out that a treatment for
mental illness was developed from the results of a single case study in a nonhuman animal. Moniz basing
his conclusions on a single case study was problematic in itself, but what about the fact that the removal
of an adaptive behavior in a nonhuman animal was taken as evidence for the viability of a treatment for a
form of mental illness? To what degree are studies of nonhuman animals currently used as part of the
process for developing treatments for mental illness? If they are similar, then how are the interpretations
of the data obtained from these nonhuman animals different from that of Moniz?
Lecture Launcher 1.7: The History of the Brain
Use the PBS Web site on the History of Research on the Brain to find events and illustrations for use in a
classroom presentation. Images can often be copied from a Web site and inserted into a PowerPoint
Presentation for in class use. (Make sure you keep a record of where the image came from.) This is not
only good for legal defense of fair use, but it may allow you to find something again when you need it.
Web Link
Web Link 1.1 History of the Brain
Lecture Launcher 1.8: Research with Animals in Psychology
“Psychologists undertake research with animals ‘...with a clear scientific purpose.’...There should be a
reasonable expectation that the research will a) increase knowledge of the processes underlying the
evolution, development, maintenance, alteration, control, or biological significance of behavior, b)
increase understanding of the species under study, or c) provide results that benefit the health or welfare
of humans or other animals.” (APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals,
Section VI.A.)
Web Links
Web Link 1.4 Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct
Web Link 1.5 Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals
Web Link 1.6 Research with Animals in Psychology
Web Link 1.7 PETA: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
14
Lecture Launcher 1.5: Studying the Brain and Behavior from All Sides
Consider the relative strengths and weakness of physiological psychology and neuropsychology.
Neuropsychology’s strength is that it deals with humans, but this is also its weakness because it precludes
experimentation. In contrast, physiological psychology can bring the power of the experimental method
and invasive neuroscientific techniques to bear on the question, but it is limited to the study of laboratory
animals.
Because the two approaches complement one another, together they can provide evidence for points of
view that neither can defend individually. Read about the case of Jimmie G. in Section 1.5 to see the
power of this approach in action.
Lecture Launcher 1.6: Chimpanzees and Mental Illness
In the analysis of Case 2 (Beck, Moniz, and Prefrontal Lobotomy), it was pointed out that a treatment for
mental illness was developed from the results of a single case study in a nonhuman animal. Moniz basing
his conclusions on a single case study was problematic in itself, but what about the fact that the removal
of an adaptive behavior in a nonhuman animal was taken as evidence for the viability of a treatment for a
form of mental illness? To what degree are studies of nonhuman animals currently used as part of the
process for developing treatments for mental illness? If they are similar, then how are the interpretations
of the data obtained from these nonhuman animals different from that of Moniz?
Lecture Launcher 1.7: The History of the Brain
Use the PBS Web site on the History of Research on the Brain to find events and illustrations for use in a
classroom presentation. Images can often be copied from a Web site and inserted into a PowerPoint
Presentation for in class use. (Make sure you keep a record of where the image came from.) This is not
only good for legal defense of fair use, but it may allow you to find something again when you need it.
Web Link
Web Link 1.1 History of the Brain
Lecture Launcher 1.8: Research with Animals in Psychology
“Psychologists undertake research with animals ‘...with a clear scientific purpose.’...There should be a
reasonable expectation that the research will a) increase knowledge of the processes underlying the
evolution, development, maintenance, alteration, control, or biological significance of behavior, b)
increase understanding of the species under study, or c) provide results that benefit the health or welfare
of humans or other animals.” (APA Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals,
Section VI.A.)
Web Links
Web Link 1.4 Ethical Principles for Psychologists and Code of Conduct
Web Link 1.5 Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in the Care and Use of Animals
Web Link 1.6 Research with Animals in Psychology
Web Link 1.7 PETA: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
Loading page 16...
13 more pages available. Scroll down to load them.
Preview Mode
Sign in to access the full document!
100%
Study Now!
XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat
Document Details
Subject
Psychology