Social Problems In A Diverse Society, Third Canadian Edition Solution Manual
Social Problems In A Diverse Society, Third Canadian Edition Solution Manual makes studying stress-free with clear and concise explanations.
Zoey Taylor
Contributor
4.1
56
1 day ago
Preview (16 of 187)
Sign in to access the full document!
CONTENTS
Preface
Chapter 1: Taking a New Look at Social Problems
Chapter 2: Poverty in the Canadian Context
Chapter 3: Racism and Ethnic Inequality
Chapter 4: Gender Inequality
Chapter 5: Inequality Based on Age
Chapter 6: Inequality Based on Sexual Orientation
Chapter 7: The Sex Trade in Canada
Chapter 8: Addictions
Chapter 9: Crime and Criminal Justice
Chapter 10: Health, Illness, and Health Care as Social Problems
Chapter 11: The Changing Family
Chapter 12: Problems in Education
Chapter 13: Problems in the Globalized Economy
Chapter 14: Problems Related to Media
Chapter 15: Population, Urbanization, and the Environmental Crisis
Chapter 16: Global Social Problems
Epilogue How Can Social Problems Be Solved?
ii
Preface
Chapter 1: Taking a New Look at Social Problems
Chapter 2: Poverty in the Canadian Context
Chapter 3: Racism and Ethnic Inequality
Chapter 4: Gender Inequality
Chapter 5: Inequality Based on Age
Chapter 6: Inequality Based on Sexual Orientation
Chapter 7: The Sex Trade in Canada
Chapter 8: Addictions
Chapter 9: Crime and Criminal Justice
Chapter 10: Health, Illness, and Health Care as Social Problems
Chapter 11: The Changing Family
Chapter 12: Problems in Education
Chapter 13: Problems in the Globalized Economy
Chapter 14: Problems Related to Media
Chapter 15: Population, Urbanization, and the Environmental Crisis
Chapter 16: Global Social Problems
Epilogue How Can Social Problems Be Solved?
ii
CONTENTS
Preface
Chapter 1: Taking a New Look at Social Problems
Chapter 2: Poverty in the Canadian Context
Chapter 3: Racism and Ethnic Inequality
Chapter 4: Gender Inequality
Chapter 5: Inequality Based on Age
Chapter 6: Inequality Based on Sexual Orientation
Chapter 7: The Sex Trade in Canada
Chapter 8: Addictions
Chapter 9: Crime and Criminal Justice
Chapter 10: Health, Illness, and Health Care as Social Problems
Chapter 11: The Changing Family
Chapter 12: Problems in Education
Chapter 13: Problems in the Globalized Economy
Chapter 14: Problems Related to Media
Chapter 15: Population, Urbanization, and the Environmental Crisis
Chapter 16: Global Social Problems
Epilogue How Can Social Problems Be Solved?
ii
Preface
Chapter 1: Taking a New Look at Social Problems
Chapter 2: Poverty in the Canadian Context
Chapter 3: Racism and Ethnic Inequality
Chapter 4: Gender Inequality
Chapter 5: Inequality Based on Age
Chapter 6: Inequality Based on Sexual Orientation
Chapter 7: The Sex Trade in Canada
Chapter 8: Addictions
Chapter 9: Crime and Criminal Justice
Chapter 10: Health, Illness, and Health Care as Social Problems
Chapter 11: The Changing Family
Chapter 12: Problems in Education
Chapter 13: Problems in the Globalized Economy
Chapter 14: Problems Related to Media
Chapter 15: Population, Urbanization, and the Environmental Crisis
Chapter 16: Global Social Problems
Epilogue How Can Social Problems Be Solved?
ii
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
1
CHAPTER 1
Taking a New Look at Social Problems
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Social problems are social conditions or patterns of behaviour that people believe warrant public
concern and collective action to bring about change. An example of a social problem is
violence—the use of physical force to cause pain, injury, or death, or damage to property and is
relational. Social problems such as violence often involve significant discrepancies between the
ideals of a society and their actual achievement. Sociologists study many types of social
problems to determine their causes, effects, and possible solutions. Sociology is the academic
and scholarly discipline that engages in systematic study of human society and social
interactions. Using the sociological imagination, we can place seemingly personal problems into
a larger context. Sociologists make connections between personal and public issues through
microlevel (focused on small-group relations and social interaction among individuals) and
macrolevel (focused on social processes occurring at the societal level) analysis. Sociologists
use four primary theoretical perspectives to examine social life and social problems: (1) the
functionalist perspective; (2) the conflict perspective; (3) the interactionist perspective; and,
(4) feminist perspectives. Microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel attempts to solve social
problems differ considerably. At the microlevel, the interactionist perspective focuses on how
individuals operate within primary groups to try to remedy a problem that affects them, their
family, or friends. Mid-range attempts focus on secondary groups and formal organizations,
looking at how they can assist individuals in overcoming problems such as drug addiction or
domestic violence. Macrolevel analysis of solutions to social problems focuses on how large-
scale social institutions such as the government and the media may become involved in
remedying social problems. Collective behaviour, social movements, and special interest
groups are among the methods people use in their attempts to reduce social problems.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading Chapter 1, students should be able to:
1. State the sociological definition of a social problem and distinguish between subjective
awareness and objective reality of social problems.
2. Distinguish between microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel analyses of social life.
3. Explain the functionalist perspective on society and state how functionalist theorists believe
that social problems arise.
4. Explain the conflict perspective on society and state how conflict theorists (using different
approaches under this perspective) believe that social problems arise.
5. Explain the interactionist perspective on society and state how interactionists believe that
social problems arise.
6. Explain feminist perspectives on society and state how feminist theorists believe that social
problems arise.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
1
CHAPTER 1
Taking a New Look at Social Problems
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Social problems are social conditions or patterns of behaviour that people believe warrant public
concern and collective action to bring about change. An example of a social problem is
violence—the use of physical force to cause pain, injury, or death, or damage to property and is
relational. Social problems such as violence often involve significant discrepancies between the
ideals of a society and their actual achievement. Sociologists study many types of social
problems to determine their causes, effects, and possible solutions. Sociology is the academic
and scholarly discipline that engages in systematic study of human society and social
interactions. Using the sociological imagination, we can place seemingly personal problems into
a larger context. Sociologists make connections between personal and public issues through
microlevel (focused on small-group relations and social interaction among individuals) and
macrolevel (focused on social processes occurring at the societal level) analysis. Sociologists
use four primary theoretical perspectives to examine social life and social problems: (1) the
functionalist perspective; (2) the conflict perspective; (3) the interactionist perspective; and,
(4) feminist perspectives. Microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel attempts to solve social
problems differ considerably. At the microlevel, the interactionist perspective focuses on how
individuals operate within primary groups to try to remedy a problem that affects them, their
family, or friends. Mid-range attempts focus on secondary groups and formal organizations,
looking at how they can assist individuals in overcoming problems such as drug addiction or
domestic violence. Macrolevel analysis of solutions to social problems focuses on how large-
scale social institutions such as the government and the media may become involved in
remedying social problems. Collective behaviour, social movements, and special interest
groups are among the methods people use in their attempts to reduce social problems.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
After reading Chapter 1, students should be able to:
1. State the sociological definition of a social problem and distinguish between subjective
awareness and objective reality of social problems.
2. Distinguish between microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel analyses of social life.
3. Explain the functionalist perspective on society and state how functionalist theorists believe
that social problems arise.
4. Explain the conflict perspective on society and state how conflict theorists (using different
approaches under this perspective) believe that social problems arise.
5. Explain the interactionist perspective on society and state how interactionists believe that
social problems arise.
6. Explain feminist perspectives on society and state how feminist theorists believe that social
problems arise.
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
2
7. Discuss, and distinguish between, microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel attempts to reduce
or solve social problems.
8. Describe how sociological theories can be used to analyse social problems such as violence.
9. Describe the part that primary groups and secondary groups play in reducing social problems.
10. Compare and contrast grassroots groups and special interest groups, and discuss how each
seeks to bring about positive social change.
11. Describe ways in which collective behaviour may be used to address a perceived social
problem.
12. Identify the five major categories of social movements and note the types of social problems
that each is most likely to address.
KEY TERMS
capitalism primary groups
civil disobedience self-fulfilling prophecy
collective behaviour situational approach
conflict perspective social change
discrimination social disorganization
dominant group social movement
functionalist perspective social problem
grassroots groups society
hate crime sociological imagination
industrialization sociology
interactionist perspective subordinate group
lifestyle-routine activity approach theory
macrolevel analysis urbanization
microlevel analysis values
norms violence
perspective
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. WHAT IS A SOCIAL PROBLEM?
A. A social problem is a social condition or a pattern of behaviour that people believe
warrants public concern and collective action to bring about change.
B. Social conditions or patterns of behaviour such as violence become defined as social
problems when they systematically disadvantage or harm a significant number of people
or when they are seen as harmful by a number of “significant people” who wield power,
wealth, and influence in a group or society.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
2
7. Discuss, and distinguish between, microlevel, mid-range and macrolevel attempts to reduce
or solve social problems.
8. Describe how sociological theories can be used to analyse social problems such as violence.
9. Describe the part that primary groups and secondary groups play in reducing social problems.
10. Compare and contrast grassroots groups and special interest groups, and discuss how each
seeks to bring about positive social change.
11. Describe ways in which collective behaviour may be used to address a perceived social
problem.
12. Identify the five major categories of social movements and note the types of social problems
that each is most likely to address.
KEY TERMS
capitalism primary groups
civil disobedience self-fulfilling prophecy
collective behaviour situational approach
conflict perspective social change
discrimination social disorganization
dominant group social movement
functionalist perspective social problem
grassroots groups society
hate crime sociological imagination
industrialization sociology
interactionist perspective subordinate group
lifestyle-routine activity approach theory
macrolevel analysis urbanization
microlevel analysis values
norms violence
perspective
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. WHAT IS A SOCIAL PROBLEM?
A. A social problem is a social condition or a pattern of behaviour that people believe
warrants public concern and collective action to bring about change.
B. Social conditions or patterns of behaviour such as violence become defined as social
problems when they systematically disadvantage or harm a significant number of people
or when they are seen as harmful by a number of “significant people” who wield power,
wealth, and influence in a group or society.
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
3
C. In sociology, examination of social problems primarily focuses on society.
1) Some social problems (e.g., violence and crime) are commonly viewed as
conditions that affect all members of a population.
2) Other social problems (e.g., racialized discrimination and sexual harassment) may
be viewed (correctly or incorrectly) as conditions that affect some members of a
population more than others.
D. Social problems often involve significant discrepancies between the ideals of society and
their actual achievement. One example is discrimination (actions or practice of
dominant group members that have harmful effects on subordinate group members),
which heightens existing inequalities along class, racialization, gender, and age lines. It
may be directed against subordinate group members whose sexual orientation, religion,
nationality, or other characteristics are devalued by those who discriminate against them.
This type of discrimination, when acted out in the form of violence, is known as a hate
crime.
E. Why Study Social Problems?
1) Studying social problems helps us understand the social forces that shape our
lives on both the personal and societal levels.
2) We learn to take a sociological approach as opposed to a commonsense (“what
everybody knows”) approach. Many commonsense notions are “myths” and may
be widely and publicly accepted, even when erroneous.
3) A sociological examination of social problems also enables us to gain new
insights into ourselves and to develop an awareness of the connection between our
own “world” and those of other people.
4) A global perspective reveals that the lives of all people are closely intertwined,
that and any one nation’s problems are part of a larger global problem.
II. THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Sociologists use systematic research techniques and report their findings to other social
scientists for consideration. Sociologists strive to be objective, although complete
objectivity may not be attainable or desirable.
B. According to sociologist C. Wright Mills, the sociological imagination is the ability to
see the relationship between individual experiences and the larger society.
1) The sociological imagination enables us to connect personal troubles to public
issues.
2) Personal troubles are private problems of individuals and the networks of people
with whom they associate regularly. For example, one person’s unemployment is
a personal trouble facing the individual, other family members, and friends.
3) Public issues are matters beyond a person’s control that originate at the regional
or national level and can be resolved only by collective action.
4) The sociological imagination helps us place seemingly personal troubles, such as
being a victim of violence, into a larger social context and see how personal
troubles may be related to public issues.
5) A clearer understanding of our situations may allow us to develop more effective
and better preventions and interventions.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
3
C. In sociology, examination of social problems primarily focuses on society.
1) Some social problems (e.g., violence and crime) are commonly viewed as
conditions that affect all members of a population.
2) Other social problems (e.g., racialized discrimination and sexual harassment) may
be viewed (correctly or incorrectly) as conditions that affect some members of a
population more than others.
D. Social problems often involve significant discrepancies between the ideals of society and
their actual achievement. One example is discrimination (actions or practice of
dominant group members that have harmful effects on subordinate group members),
which heightens existing inequalities along class, racialization, gender, and age lines. It
may be directed against subordinate group members whose sexual orientation, religion,
nationality, or other characteristics are devalued by those who discriminate against them.
This type of discrimination, when acted out in the form of violence, is known as a hate
crime.
E. Why Study Social Problems?
1) Studying social problems helps us understand the social forces that shape our
lives on both the personal and societal levels.
2) We learn to take a sociological approach as opposed to a commonsense (“what
everybody knows”) approach. Many commonsense notions are “myths” and may
be widely and publicly accepted, even when erroneous.
3) A sociological examination of social problems also enables us to gain new
insights into ourselves and to develop an awareness of the connection between our
own “world” and those of other people.
4) A global perspective reveals that the lives of all people are closely intertwined,
that and any one nation’s problems are part of a larger global problem.
II. THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Sociologists use systematic research techniques and report their findings to other social
scientists for consideration. Sociologists strive to be objective, although complete
objectivity may not be attainable or desirable.
B. According to sociologist C. Wright Mills, the sociological imagination is the ability to
see the relationship between individual experiences and the larger society.
1) The sociological imagination enables us to connect personal troubles to public
issues.
2) Personal troubles are private problems of individuals and the networks of people
with whom they associate regularly. For example, one person’s unemployment is
a personal trouble facing the individual, other family members, and friends.
3) Public issues are matters beyond a person’s control that originate at the regional
or national level and can be resolved only by collective action.
4) The sociological imagination helps us place seemingly personal troubles, such as
being a victim of violence, into a larger social context and see how personal
troubles may be related to public issues.
5) A clearer understanding of our situations may allow us to develop more effective
and better preventions and interventions.
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
4
C. Sociologists make connections between personal and public issues in society through
microlevel and macrolevel analysis. Using microlevel analysis, a sociologist might
investigate how fear of unemployment affects workers and their immediate families. A
macrolevel analysis might examine how globalization, and the attendant labour market
restructuring, has impacted Canadian workers and their families.
III. SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. How Sociologists View Society
1) Sociologists develop theories and conduct research to determine how social life is
organized. Theories help us interpret social reality in a distinct way by giving us a
framework for organizing our observations and may allow us to describe, explain
or possibly even predict social events.
2) Sociologists refer to a theoretical framework as a perspective, an overall approach
or viewpoint toward some subject.
B. The Functionalist Perspective
1) According to the functionalist perspective, society is a stable, orderly system
composed of a number of interrelated parts, each of which performs a function
that contributes to the overall stability of society.
2) These interrelated parts are social institutions (such as families, the economy,
education, and the government) that a society develops to organize its main
concerns and activities so that social needs are met. Each institution performs a
unique function, the contribution that each part makes to the overall stability of
society and the well-being of individuals.
3) Manifest and Latent Functions:
Social institutions perform two different types of societal functions:
manifest functions (the intended and recognized consequences of an activity or
social process) and latent functions (the unintended consequences of an activity or
social process that are hidden and remain unacknowledged by participants).
4) Dysfunctions and Social Disorganization:
From the functionalist perspective, social problems arise when social institutions
do not fulfill the functions they are supposed to perform or when dysfunctions
(undesirable consequences of an activity or social process that inhibit a society’s
ability to adapt or adjust) occur.
a. According to functionalists, dysfunctions in social institutions create
social disorganization, causing a breakdown in traditional values and
norms that serve as the social control mechanisms that, under normal
circumstances, keep people from engaging in nonconforming behaviour.
Although values provide ideas about behaviour, they do not state
explicitly how we should behave; norms do state explicit rules of
behaviour or standards of conduct.
b. Social disorganization is intensified by rapid social change that disrupts
the stability of society. Early sociologists examined the relationship
between social problems and industrialization and urbanization in
Britain, Western Europe, and the United States in the late nineteenth and
early twentieth centuries.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
4
C. Sociologists make connections between personal and public issues in society through
microlevel and macrolevel analysis. Using microlevel analysis, a sociologist might
investigate how fear of unemployment affects workers and their immediate families. A
macrolevel analysis might examine how globalization, and the attendant labour market
restructuring, has impacted Canadian workers and their families.
III. SOCIOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES ON SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. How Sociologists View Society
1) Sociologists develop theories and conduct research to determine how social life is
organized. Theories help us interpret social reality in a distinct way by giving us a
framework for organizing our observations and may allow us to describe, explain
or possibly even predict social events.
2) Sociologists refer to a theoretical framework as a perspective, an overall approach
or viewpoint toward some subject.
B. The Functionalist Perspective
1) According to the functionalist perspective, society is a stable, orderly system
composed of a number of interrelated parts, each of which performs a function
that contributes to the overall stability of society.
2) These interrelated parts are social institutions (such as families, the economy,
education, and the government) that a society develops to organize its main
concerns and activities so that social needs are met. Each institution performs a
unique function, the contribution that each part makes to the overall stability of
society and the well-being of individuals.
3) Manifest and Latent Functions:
Social institutions perform two different types of societal functions:
manifest functions (the intended and recognized consequences of an activity or
social process) and latent functions (the unintended consequences of an activity or
social process that are hidden and remain unacknowledged by participants).
4) Dysfunctions and Social Disorganization:
From the functionalist perspective, social problems arise when social institutions
do not fulfill the functions they are supposed to perform or when dysfunctions
(undesirable consequences of an activity or social process that inhibit a society’s
ability to adapt or adjust) occur.
a. According to functionalists, dysfunctions in social institutions create
social disorganization, causing a breakdown in traditional values and
norms that serve as the social control mechanisms that, under normal
circumstances, keep people from engaging in nonconforming behaviour.
Although values provide ideas about behaviour, they do not state
explicitly how we should behave; norms do state explicit rules of
behaviour or standards of conduct.
b. Social disorganization is intensified by rapid social change that disrupts
the stability of society. Early sociologists examined the relationship
between social problems and industrialization and urbanization in
Britain, Western Europe, and the United States in the late nineteenth and
early twentieth centuries.
Loading page 6...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
5
5) Applying the Functionalist Perspective to Problems of Violence:
Functionalists provide several explanations for violence in societies. One
approach believes that violence arises from a condition of anomie, in which many
individuals have a feeling of helplessness, normlessness, or alienation. Another
functionalist explanation of violence is the lifestyle-routine activity approach, in
which the patterns and timing of people’s daily movements and activities are the
keys to understanding violent personal crimes as well as other types of crime.
C. The Conflict Perspective
1) The conflict perspective is based on the assumption that groups in society are
engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources.
2) According to conflict theorists, certain groups of people are privileged while
others are disadvantaged through the unjust use of political, economic, or social
power. This perspective consists of a variety of related approaches that hold
differing views regarding the most important form of conflict.
3) The Value Conflict Perspective:
According to value conflict theorists, social problems are conditions incompatible
with group values.
a. Value clashes are ordinary occurrences in families, communities, and the
larger society, where people commonly hold many divergent values.
Although individuals may share certain core values, they do not share all
values or a common culture (the knowledge, language, values, customs,
and material objects that are passed from person to person and from one
generation to the next in a human group or society).
b. Discrepancies between ideal (the values and beliefs people claim they
hold) and real culture (the values and beliefs they actually follow) are a
source of social problems in all societies.
4) Critical-Conflict Perspective:
According to critical-conflict theorists, social problems arise out of major
contradictions inherent in the way societies are organized.
a. Some of these approaches focus on class inequalities resulting from
capitalism, while others focus on inequalities based on
racialization/ethnicity or gender.
b. According to early German economist Karl Marx, members of the
capitalist class (the bourgeoisie) control the means of production (e.g., the
land, tools, factories, and money for investment) and are at the top of a
system of social stratification that affords them different lifestyles and life
chances from the members of the working class (the proletariat), who
must sell their labour power (ability to work) to capitalists. In the process,
the capitalists derive excessive profit from the workers’ labour.
c. Marx believed that capitalism led workers to experience increased levels
of poverty and alienation, feelings of powerlessness and estrangement
from other people and from oneself. He predicted the workers would
eventually overthrow the capitalist economic system.
5) Some critical-conflict approaches focus on racialized and gendered subordination
instead of on class-based inequalities. Theorists who emphasize discrimination
and inequality based on racialization or ethnicity note that many social problems
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
5
5) Applying the Functionalist Perspective to Problems of Violence:
Functionalists provide several explanations for violence in societies. One
approach believes that violence arises from a condition of anomie, in which many
individuals have a feeling of helplessness, normlessness, or alienation. Another
functionalist explanation of violence is the lifestyle-routine activity approach, in
which the patterns and timing of people’s daily movements and activities are the
keys to understanding violent personal crimes as well as other types of crime.
C. The Conflict Perspective
1) The conflict perspective is based on the assumption that groups in society are
engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources.
2) According to conflict theorists, certain groups of people are privileged while
others are disadvantaged through the unjust use of political, economic, or social
power. This perspective consists of a variety of related approaches that hold
differing views regarding the most important form of conflict.
3) The Value Conflict Perspective:
According to value conflict theorists, social problems are conditions incompatible
with group values.
a. Value clashes are ordinary occurrences in families, communities, and the
larger society, where people commonly hold many divergent values.
Although individuals may share certain core values, they do not share all
values or a common culture (the knowledge, language, values, customs,
and material objects that are passed from person to person and from one
generation to the next in a human group or society).
b. Discrepancies between ideal (the values and beliefs people claim they
hold) and real culture (the values and beliefs they actually follow) are a
source of social problems in all societies.
4) Critical-Conflict Perspective:
According to critical-conflict theorists, social problems arise out of major
contradictions inherent in the way societies are organized.
a. Some of these approaches focus on class inequalities resulting from
capitalism, while others focus on inequalities based on
racialization/ethnicity or gender.
b. According to early German economist Karl Marx, members of the
capitalist class (the bourgeoisie) control the means of production (e.g., the
land, tools, factories, and money for investment) and are at the top of a
system of social stratification that affords them different lifestyles and life
chances from the members of the working class (the proletariat), who
must sell their labour power (ability to work) to capitalists. In the process,
the capitalists derive excessive profit from the workers’ labour.
c. Marx believed that capitalism led workers to experience increased levels
of poverty and alienation, feelings of powerlessness and estrangement
from other people and from oneself. He predicted the workers would
eventually overthrow the capitalist economic system.
5) Some critical-conflict approaches focus on racialized and gendered subordination
instead of on class-based inequalities. Theorists who emphasize discrimination
and inequality based on racialization or ethnicity note that many social problems
Loading page 7...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
6
are rooted in the continuing exploitation and subordination of people of colour
and Indigenous people by White people and White-dominant systems.
6) Applying the Conflict Perspective to Problems of Violence:
Critical conflict theorists believe that in capitalist societies the wealthy may
engage in some forms of violence to further their economic interests (e.g., the
abuse of police or military power to protect property) whereas people living in
poverty may engage in other forms of violence as a reaction against the unjust
social and economic conditions they experience daily.
D. The Interactionist Perspective
1) The interactionist perspective focuses on a microlevel analysis of how people act
toward one another and make sense of their daily lives, viewing society as the
sum of the interactions of individuals and groups.
2) Most interactionists study social problems by analyzing the process whereby
certain behaviour is defined as a social problem and how individuals and groups
come to engage in activities that a significant number of people view as a major
social concern.
3) A founder of the interactionist approach, German sociologist Georg Simmel,
investigated the impact of industrialization and urbanization on people’s values
and behaviour within small social units. He noted that rapid changes in
technology and dramatic growth of cities produced new social problems by
breaking up the “geometry of social life.”
4) According to Simmel, alienation is brought about by a decline in personal and
emotional contacts. How people interpret subjective messages they receive from
others, as well as the situations they encounter in their daily life, strongly
influences their behaviour and their perceptions of what constitutes a social
problem.
5) Labelling Theory and the Social Construction of Reality:
Other interactionists examine how people impose meanings on others. According
to sociologist Howard Becker, moral entrepreneurs are persons who use their
own views of right and wrong to establish rules and label others as deviant.
a. Labelling theory suggests that deviants are people who have been
successfully labelled as such by others.
b. It raises questions about why some individuals and types of behaviour are
labelled deviant but others are not.
c. According to some interaction theorists, many social problems can be
linked to the social construction of reality, or the process by which
people’s perception of reality and their subsequent reaction, if any, is
shaped largely by the subjective meaning that they give to an experience.
d. A related approach that some interactionists favour is the definition of the
situation approach, often called the Thomas Theorum after sociologists
Dorothy S. Thomas and William I. Thomas. The Thomas Theroum
suggests that how people define a situation determines their reaction to it.
If a situation is perceived as real, it is real in its consequences.
e. Sociologist Robert Merton has suggested that when people view a
situation in a certain way and act according to their perceptions, the end
result may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
6
are rooted in the continuing exploitation and subordination of people of colour
and Indigenous people by White people and White-dominant systems.
6) Applying the Conflict Perspective to Problems of Violence:
Critical conflict theorists believe that in capitalist societies the wealthy may
engage in some forms of violence to further their economic interests (e.g., the
abuse of police or military power to protect property) whereas people living in
poverty may engage in other forms of violence as a reaction against the unjust
social and economic conditions they experience daily.
D. The Interactionist Perspective
1) The interactionist perspective focuses on a microlevel analysis of how people act
toward one another and make sense of their daily lives, viewing society as the
sum of the interactions of individuals and groups.
2) Most interactionists study social problems by analyzing the process whereby
certain behaviour is defined as a social problem and how individuals and groups
come to engage in activities that a significant number of people view as a major
social concern.
3) A founder of the interactionist approach, German sociologist Georg Simmel,
investigated the impact of industrialization and urbanization on people’s values
and behaviour within small social units. He noted that rapid changes in
technology and dramatic growth of cities produced new social problems by
breaking up the “geometry of social life.”
4) According to Simmel, alienation is brought about by a decline in personal and
emotional contacts. How people interpret subjective messages they receive from
others, as well as the situations they encounter in their daily life, strongly
influences their behaviour and their perceptions of what constitutes a social
problem.
5) Labelling Theory and the Social Construction of Reality:
Other interactionists examine how people impose meanings on others. According
to sociologist Howard Becker, moral entrepreneurs are persons who use their
own views of right and wrong to establish rules and label others as deviant.
a. Labelling theory suggests that deviants are people who have been
successfully labelled as such by others.
b. It raises questions about why some individuals and types of behaviour are
labelled deviant but others are not.
c. According to some interaction theorists, many social problems can be
linked to the social construction of reality, or the process by which
people’s perception of reality and their subsequent reaction, if any, is
shaped largely by the subjective meaning that they give to an experience.
d. A related approach that some interactionists favour is the definition of the
situation approach, often called the Thomas Theorum after sociologists
Dorothy S. Thomas and William I. Thomas. The Thomas Theroum
suggests that how people define a situation determines their reaction to it.
If a situation is perceived as real, it is real in its consequences.
e. Sociologist Robert Merton has suggested that when people view a
situation in a certain way and act according to their perceptions, the end
result may be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Loading page 8...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
7
6) Applying Interactionist Perspectives to Problems of Violence:
a. To analyze the problem of violence, interactionists focus on social
interaction, and note that human behaviour is learned through interaction.
For interactionists, violence is a learned response, not an inherent
characteristic.
b. Interactionists also look at the types of social interactions that commonly
lead to violence. The situational approach suggests that violence results
from a specific interaction process, termed a “situational transaction.”
c. According to interactionists, reducing violence requires changing those
societal values that encourage excessive competition and violence.
E. Feminist Perspectives
1) Feminist theorists begin their analysis by pointing out that mainstream sociological
thought and theory is both androcentric and Eurocentric, in that most sociological
theory is based on the experiences, ideas, and issues of concern for males,
particularly those males of European/Western extraction.
2) There are no “feminist issues” per se since every issue is a feminist issue. When
feminist theorists engage in analysis, they “gender” the issues under study by
looking at the differential impacts of social phenomena for men and women, and
more recently for transgendered and/or non-gendered people as well.
3) Feminist theories typically examine dynamics of power in relationships between
individuals, roles, and structures. This focus on power differentials is shared with
conflict and Marxist theories, but feminist theories add a focus on gendered power
and patriarchy. These theories generally begin an analysis from a particular
“standpoint” by examining social life from the situated vantage points of the
individuals and/or groups involved.
4) A classification system that categorizes various feminist theories includes:
a. theories of difference (men and women experience different realities);
b. theories of inequality (women’s experiences are less privileged or are
disadvantaged relative to men’s); and
c. or, theories of oppression (women are actively subordinated and kept
disadvantaged, both by patriarchal structures and individuals reinforcing
sexist socialization and ideologies).
5) Modern-day feminist theories, if they are reflexive, turn the lenses back upon
themselves. Many contemporary feminists spend a good deal of time
deconstructing the theories they favour, the underlying assumptions, the
exclusions, the inclusiveness, the intersections and the impacts of the analysis.
6) Applying Feminist Perspectives to Problems of Violence:
a. Feminist perspectives of violence highlight issues of dominance and
power, and suggest that inequalities between groups result in violence.
They conclude that people who enjoy power and privilege likely commit
as many acts of violence as those who are disenfranchised, and that main
difference between groups is that those without power are
disproportionately targeted as the perpetrators or viewed as bringing it on
themselves.
b. One feminist perspective suggests that violence against women is a means
of reinforcing patriarchy. Gender stratification is reinforced by powerful
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
7
6) Applying Interactionist Perspectives to Problems of Violence:
a. To analyze the problem of violence, interactionists focus on social
interaction, and note that human behaviour is learned through interaction.
For interactionists, violence is a learned response, not an inherent
characteristic.
b. Interactionists also look at the types of social interactions that commonly
lead to violence. The situational approach suggests that violence results
from a specific interaction process, termed a “situational transaction.”
c. According to interactionists, reducing violence requires changing those
societal values that encourage excessive competition and violence.
E. Feminist Perspectives
1) Feminist theorists begin their analysis by pointing out that mainstream sociological
thought and theory is both androcentric and Eurocentric, in that most sociological
theory is based on the experiences, ideas, and issues of concern for males,
particularly those males of European/Western extraction.
2) There are no “feminist issues” per se since every issue is a feminist issue. When
feminist theorists engage in analysis, they “gender” the issues under study by
looking at the differential impacts of social phenomena for men and women, and
more recently for transgendered and/or non-gendered people as well.
3) Feminist theories typically examine dynamics of power in relationships between
individuals, roles, and structures. This focus on power differentials is shared with
conflict and Marxist theories, but feminist theories add a focus on gendered power
and patriarchy. These theories generally begin an analysis from a particular
“standpoint” by examining social life from the situated vantage points of the
individuals and/or groups involved.
4) A classification system that categorizes various feminist theories includes:
a. theories of difference (men and women experience different realities);
b. theories of inequality (women’s experiences are less privileged or are
disadvantaged relative to men’s); and
c. or, theories of oppression (women are actively subordinated and kept
disadvantaged, both by patriarchal structures and individuals reinforcing
sexist socialization and ideologies).
5) Modern-day feminist theories, if they are reflexive, turn the lenses back upon
themselves. Many contemporary feminists spend a good deal of time
deconstructing the theories they favour, the underlying assumptions, the
exclusions, the inclusiveness, the intersections and the impacts of the analysis.
6) Applying Feminist Perspectives to Problems of Violence:
a. Feminist perspectives of violence highlight issues of dominance and
power, and suggest that inequalities between groups result in violence.
They conclude that people who enjoy power and privilege likely commit
as many acts of violence as those who are disenfranchised, and that main
difference between groups is that those without power are
disproportionately targeted as the perpetrators or viewed as bringing it on
themselves.
b. One feminist perspective suggests that violence against women is a means
of reinforcing patriarchy. Gender stratification is reinforced by powerful
Loading page 9...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
8
physical, psychological, and social mechanisms of control, including force
or the threat of force. Fear of violence forces women to adapt their ways
of being in and navigating the social world in order to ensure they are not
in a position to be victimized by men.
IV. SOCIAL CHANGE AND REDUCING SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. The concept of social change is important to our discussion of reducing social problems.
Social change often occurs over time. Some efforts to deal with social problems are
short-term strategies, whereas others are middle-term remedies, and still others constitute
long-term efforts to alleviate the root causes of a social problem. For example, efforts to
alleviate individual unemployment or reduce unemployment rates in a community have a
different temporal dimension than long-term efforts to change the political economy in
such a manner that high levels of employment and greater wage equity are brought about
throughout a nation or nations. Some discussions of social change sound idealistic or
utopian; however, for most social problems, a combination of strategies will be required
to reduce them (for example, unemployment would need multi-level strategies to
effectively prevent it).
V. MICROLEVEL ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Seeking Individual Solutions to Personal Problems
1) Microlevel analysis of solutions to social problems focuses on how individuals
operate within small groups to try to remedy a problem that affects them, their
family, or friends. In this case, most people turn to their primary groups. Primary
groups include one’s family, close friends, and other peers with whom one
routinely shares the more personal experiences in life (such as school- or work-
related peer groups).
2) According to sociologists, members of our primary groups are usually there to
support us even when others are not. Consequently, many people turn first to
family members and friends. For example, some analysts believe that we have
many more people who are without a domicile (who are technically “homeless”)
than current statistics indicate: whenever possible, homeless individuals may live
with relatives or friends, many of whom may already live in overcrowded and
sometimes substandard housing. When people seek such short-term solutions to
personal troubles, most believe the situation will be temporary. However,
problems that are widespread or embedded in the larger society may stretch into
months or years without resolution. At best, individualized efforts to reduce a
problem are short-term measures, which some critics refer as the “band-aid
approach” because such efforts most often do not eliminate the causes of the
problem.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
8
physical, psychological, and social mechanisms of control, including force
or the threat of force. Fear of violence forces women to adapt their ways
of being in and navigating the social world in order to ensure they are not
in a position to be victimized by men.
IV. SOCIAL CHANGE AND REDUCING SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. The concept of social change is important to our discussion of reducing social problems.
Social change often occurs over time. Some efforts to deal with social problems are
short-term strategies, whereas others are middle-term remedies, and still others constitute
long-term efforts to alleviate the root causes of a social problem. For example, efforts to
alleviate individual unemployment or reduce unemployment rates in a community have a
different temporal dimension than long-term efforts to change the political economy in
such a manner that high levels of employment and greater wage equity are brought about
throughout a nation or nations. Some discussions of social change sound idealistic or
utopian; however, for most social problems, a combination of strategies will be required
to reduce them (for example, unemployment would need multi-level strategies to
effectively prevent it).
V. MICROLEVEL ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Seeking Individual Solutions to Personal Problems
1) Microlevel analysis of solutions to social problems focuses on how individuals
operate within small groups to try to remedy a problem that affects them, their
family, or friends. In this case, most people turn to their primary groups. Primary
groups include one’s family, close friends, and other peers with whom one
routinely shares the more personal experiences in life (such as school- or work-
related peer groups).
2) According to sociologists, members of our primary groups are usually there to
support us even when others are not. Consequently, many people turn first to
family members and friends. For example, some analysts believe that we have
many more people who are without a domicile (who are technically “homeless”)
than current statistics indicate: whenever possible, homeless individuals may live
with relatives or friends, many of whom may already live in overcrowded and
sometimes substandard housing. When people seek such short-term solutions to
personal troubles, most believe the situation will be temporary. However,
problems that are widespread or embedded in the larger society may stretch into
months or years without resolution. At best, individualized efforts to reduce a
problem are short-term measures, which some critics refer as the “band-aid
approach” because such efforts most often do not eliminate the causes of the
problem.
Loading page 10...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
9
3) Some microlevel approaches to reducing social problems focus on how
individuals can do something about the problems they face. For example, a person
who is unemployed or among the “working poor” because of low wages, seasonal
employment, or other factors may be urged to get more education or training and
work experience in order to find a “better” job and have the opportunity for
upward mobility.
VI. MID-RANGE ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Groups That Help People Cope With Their Problems
1) Groups that attempt to reduce a social problem by helping individuals cope with
it, or to eliminate it from their own lives, are commonplace in our society (e.g.
Alcoholics Anonymous or “AA”). The basic assumption of most mid-range
approaches to reducing social problems is that prevention and intervention are
most effective at the personal and community levels.
2) Typically, self-help groups bring together individuals who have experienced the
same problem and have the same goals- quitting the problematic behaviour. An
underlying assumption of this approach is that some social problems can best be
reduced by reaching one person at a time. Volunteers who have had similar
problems (and believe they are on the road to overcoming them) often act as role
models for newer members.
3) Mid-range approaches may bring changes in the individual’s life; however, such
groups typically do not systematically address the larger structural factors (such
as unemployment, work-related stress, and aggressive advertising campaigns) that
may contribute to the problems. As a result, larger, societal intervention is
necessary to reduce the underlying problems that contribute to individual
behaviour. For example, AA typically does not lobby for more stringent laws
pertaining to drunk driving or the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages.
B. Grassroots Groups That Work for Community-Based Change
1) Some grassroots groups focus on bringing about a change that may reduce or
eliminate a social problem in a specific community or region. From this approach,
people learn how to empower themselves against local, provincial, territorial, and
national government officials; corporate executives; and media figures who
determine what constitutes the “news” in their area.
2) Social analysts suggest that more community dialogue is needed on social issues,
and more people need to become involved in grassroots social movements.
Because social movements have not become institutionalized and are outside the
political mainstream, they empower outsiders by offering them an opportunity to
have their voices heard.
3) Grassroots organizations and other local structures are crucial to national social
movements because these movements must recruit members and gain the
economic resources necessary for nationwide or global social activism.
Numerous studies have shown that the local level constitutes a necessary micro-
foundation for larger-scale social movement activism.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
9
3) Some microlevel approaches to reducing social problems focus on how
individuals can do something about the problems they face. For example, a person
who is unemployed or among the “working poor” because of low wages, seasonal
employment, or other factors may be urged to get more education or training and
work experience in order to find a “better” job and have the opportunity for
upward mobility.
VI. MID-RANGE ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Groups That Help People Cope With Their Problems
1) Groups that attempt to reduce a social problem by helping individuals cope with
it, or to eliminate it from their own lives, are commonplace in our society (e.g.
Alcoholics Anonymous or “AA”). The basic assumption of most mid-range
approaches to reducing social problems is that prevention and intervention are
most effective at the personal and community levels.
2) Typically, self-help groups bring together individuals who have experienced the
same problem and have the same goals- quitting the problematic behaviour. An
underlying assumption of this approach is that some social problems can best be
reduced by reaching one person at a time. Volunteers who have had similar
problems (and believe they are on the road to overcoming them) often act as role
models for newer members.
3) Mid-range approaches may bring changes in the individual’s life; however, such
groups typically do not systematically address the larger structural factors (such
as unemployment, work-related stress, and aggressive advertising campaigns) that
may contribute to the problems. As a result, larger, societal intervention is
necessary to reduce the underlying problems that contribute to individual
behaviour. For example, AA typically does not lobby for more stringent laws
pertaining to drunk driving or the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages.
B. Grassroots Groups That Work for Community-Based Change
1) Some grassroots groups focus on bringing about a change that may reduce or
eliminate a social problem in a specific community or region. From this approach,
people learn how to empower themselves against local, provincial, territorial, and
national government officials; corporate executives; and media figures who
determine what constitutes the “news” in their area.
2) Social analysts suggest that more community dialogue is needed on social issues,
and more people need to become involved in grassroots social movements.
Because social movements have not become institutionalized and are outside the
political mainstream, they empower outsiders by offering them an opportunity to
have their voices heard.
3) Grassroots organizations and other local structures are crucial to national social
movements because these movements must recruit members and gain the
economic resources necessary for nationwide or global social activism.
Numerous studies have shown that the local level constitutes a necessary micro-
foundation for larger-scale social movement activism.
Loading page 11...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
10
4) Some social movements participate in what has been defined as counter-
hegemonic practice by Canadian sociologist William K. Carroll. Counter-
hegemonic practice refers to creating true alternatives to hegemony, although
counter-hegemonic social movements need to be aware of the movement’s
potential to create new injustices by defining its own issues as “the” issues.
VII. MACROLEVEL ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Working Through Special Interest Groups for Political Change
1) Examples of special interest groups include the Canadian Labour Congress, the
Reform Party, and REAL Women. They are often referred to as pressure groups
or lobbies, and may be categorized on the basis of four factors:
2) Issues. Some groups focus on single issues (such as abortion, gun control, or
teaching acceptance for family diversity in Canadian schools); others focus on
multiple issues (such as equal access to education, employment, and health care).
3) View of the present system of wealth and power. Some groups make radical
demands that would involve the end of patriarchy, capitalism, governmental
bureaucracy, or other existing power structures; others do not attack the
legitimacy of the present system of wealth and power but insist on specific social
reforms.
4) Beliefs about elites. Some groups want to influence elites (or incorporate
movement leaders into the elite); others want to replace the existing elites with
persons whom they believe share their own interests and concerns.
5) Type of Political Action. There are often many different groups, all of whom do
not entirely agree on the nature or extent of the problems of proposed solutions,
who may try to gain recognition from elected officials or bureaucrats for their
agendas.
B. Working through National Social Movements to Reduce Problems
1) Collective behavior and national social movements are significant ways in which
people seek to resolve social problems. Examples of collective behavior include
public demonstrations and riots.
2) Beginning with the 1919 Egyptian revolution against British occupation, an
increasingly popular form of public demonstration is civil disobedience. People
often seek to bring about change through actions such as sit-ins, marches,
boycotts, and strikes. When people refuse to abide by a policy or law and
challenge authorities to do something about it, they are demanding social change
with some sense of urgency. Sometimes referred to as protest crowds, these
groups engage in activities that they hope will achieve specific political goals.
3) National social movements are divided into five major categories:
a. Reform movements seek to improve society by changing some specific
aspect of the social structure. Environmental groups and disability rights
groups are examples of groups of people who seek to bring about a change
that they perceive will benefit themselves and others. Activists in reform
movements typically seek to bring about change by working within the
existing organizational structures of society.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
10
4) Some social movements participate in what has been defined as counter-
hegemonic practice by Canadian sociologist William K. Carroll. Counter-
hegemonic practice refers to creating true alternatives to hegemony, although
counter-hegemonic social movements need to be aware of the movement’s
potential to create new injustices by defining its own issues as “the” issues.
VII. MACROLEVEL ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE SOCIAL PROBLEMS
A. Working Through Special Interest Groups for Political Change
1) Examples of special interest groups include the Canadian Labour Congress, the
Reform Party, and REAL Women. They are often referred to as pressure groups
or lobbies, and may be categorized on the basis of four factors:
2) Issues. Some groups focus on single issues (such as abortion, gun control, or
teaching acceptance for family diversity in Canadian schools); others focus on
multiple issues (such as equal access to education, employment, and health care).
3) View of the present system of wealth and power. Some groups make radical
demands that would involve the end of patriarchy, capitalism, governmental
bureaucracy, or other existing power structures; others do not attack the
legitimacy of the present system of wealth and power but insist on specific social
reforms.
4) Beliefs about elites. Some groups want to influence elites (or incorporate
movement leaders into the elite); others want to replace the existing elites with
persons whom they believe share their own interests and concerns.
5) Type of Political Action. There are often many different groups, all of whom do
not entirely agree on the nature or extent of the problems of proposed solutions,
who may try to gain recognition from elected officials or bureaucrats for their
agendas.
B. Working through National Social Movements to Reduce Problems
1) Collective behavior and national social movements are significant ways in which
people seek to resolve social problems. Examples of collective behavior include
public demonstrations and riots.
2) Beginning with the 1919 Egyptian revolution against British occupation, an
increasingly popular form of public demonstration is civil disobedience. People
often seek to bring about change through actions such as sit-ins, marches,
boycotts, and strikes. When people refuse to abide by a policy or law and
challenge authorities to do something about it, they are demanding social change
with some sense of urgency. Sometimes referred to as protest crowds, these
groups engage in activities that they hope will achieve specific political goals.
3) National social movements are divided into five major categories:
a. Reform movements seek to improve society by changing some specific
aspect of the social structure. Environmental groups and disability rights
groups are examples of groups of people who seek to bring about a change
that they perceive will benefit themselves and others. Activists in reform
movements typically seek to bring about change by working within the
existing organizational structures of society.
Loading page 12...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
11
b. Revolutionary movements seek to bring about a total change in society.
Examples include utopian groups and radical terrorists who use fear tactics
to intimidate and—at least briefly—gain concessions from those with
whom they disagree ideologically. Some radical terrorists may kill people
in their pursuit of a society that more closely conforms to their own
worldview.
c. Religious movements (also referred to as expressive movements) seek to
renovate or renew people through inner change. For this reason, religious
movements are often linked to local and regional organizations that seek
to bring about changes in the individual’s life. National religious
movements often seek to persuade political officials to enact laws that will
replace or eliminate what they perceive to be social problems.
d. Alternative movements seek limited change in some aspects of people’s
behaviour and currently include a variety of “New Age” movements
which emphasize such things as the development of a new national
spiritual consciousness.
e. Resistance movements seek to prevent change or undo change that has
already occurred. In public debates over social policies, most social
movements advocating change will face resistance from the members of
reactive movements that hold opposing viewpoints and want social policy
to reflect their own beliefs and values. Examples of resistance movements
include those which oppose same sex marriage, anti-abortion groups, such
as “Operation Rescue,” which seek to close clinics which provide
abortions and to recriminalize abortion; and anti-immigrant groups
seeking to close Canadian borders to outsiders or to place harsher
demands on immigrant workers.
TEACHING SUGGESTIONS FOR ACTIVE LEARNING
Professor Kathleen McKinney, one of the recipients of the Hans O. Mauksch Award for
distinguished contributions to undergraduate sociology, is an advocate of active learning and has
provided outstanding suggestions for classroom techniques to encourage students to do more
than simply listen to a lecture. According to McKinney, active learning techniques are most
likely to succeed when instructors prepare students in advance by providing specific objectives
for the activities and explaining how using active learning techniques will benefit them. It is
important to solicit student feedback afterwards in order to improve the activity in the future.
Four of McKinney’s suggestions are summarized here because they are incorporated into
teaching suggestions throughout this manual:
1. Think-Pair-Share: After giving students a question or problem to solve, give them a few
minutes to think about the problem alone. Then have them discuss their ideas with the
person sitting next to them. Finally, have student pairs share their ideas with the whole
class or a larger group. This can be done in any size class, including those meeting in
lecture halls with permanently fixed seating.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
11
b. Revolutionary movements seek to bring about a total change in society.
Examples include utopian groups and radical terrorists who use fear tactics
to intimidate and—at least briefly—gain concessions from those with
whom they disagree ideologically. Some radical terrorists may kill people
in their pursuit of a society that more closely conforms to their own
worldview.
c. Religious movements (also referred to as expressive movements) seek to
renovate or renew people through inner change. For this reason, religious
movements are often linked to local and regional organizations that seek
to bring about changes in the individual’s life. National religious
movements often seek to persuade political officials to enact laws that will
replace or eliminate what they perceive to be social problems.
d. Alternative movements seek limited change in some aspects of people’s
behaviour and currently include a variety of “New Age” movements
which emphasize such things as the development of a new national
spiritual consciousness.
e. Resistance movements seek to prevent change or undo change that has
already occurred. In public debates over social policies, most social
movements advocating change will face resistance from the members of
reactive movements that hold opposing viewpoints and want social policy
to reflect their own beliefs and values. Examples of resistance movements
include those which oppose same sex marriage, anti-abortion groups, such
as “Operation Rescue,” which seek to close clinics which provide
abortions and to recriminalize abortion; and anti-immigrant groups
seeking to close Canadian borders to outsiders or to place harsher
demands on immigrant workers.
TEACHING SUGGESTIONS FOR ACTIVE LEARNING
Professor Kathleen McKinney, one of the recipients of the Hans O. Mauksch Award for
distinguished contributions to undergraduate sociology, is an advocate of active learning and has
provided outstanding suggestions for classroom techniques to encourage students to do more
than simply listen to a lecture. According to McKinney, active learning techniques are most
likely to succeed when instructors prepare students in advance by providing specific objectives
for the activities and explaining how using active learning techniques will benefit them. It is
important to solicit student feedback afterwards in order to improve the activity in the future.
Four of McKinney’s suggestions are summarized here because they are incorporated into
teaching suggestions throughout this manual:
1. Think-Pair-Share: After giving students a question or problem to solve, give them a few
minutes to think about the problem alone. Then have them discuss their ideas with the
person sitting next to them. Finally, have student pairs share their ideas with the whole
class or a larger group. This can be done in any size class, including those meeting in
lecture halls with permanently fixed seating.
Loading page 13...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
12
2. Collaborative Learning Groups: Students work in groups to fulfill a task. Each group
chooses a leader and someone to take notes, and the group presents a response or a paper
to the entire class. This requires flexibility in classroom space or having some other
location or time when students can confer with each other.
3. Analysis or reaction to videos: Before showing a video, prepare students with questions
or ideas on which to focus. After the video, ask them to answer the questions or write a
review or reaction, applying sociological concepts and perspectives. Have the students
present their ideas to the class.
4. Student debates: Having students prepare for and present debates on the social issues
discussed in the text and in class provides an outstanding opportunity to expose them to
more than one viewpoint. Students should be given advance assignments, suggested
resources, and a game plan for how to approach the debates so they can take a position,
gather data, and support their viewpoints.
Kathleen McKinney, Sociology, Illinois State University, Normal, Il, kmckinne@ilstu.edu
ACCESSING THE REAL WORLD: ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT WITH
PROBLEMS RELATED TO VIOLENCE
Focus on Community Action
Have a class discussion about prevention and intervention strategies for reducing youth violence
and gang participation in your community. Although people have initially laughed at ideas such
as midnight basketball, bowling, or dances, some social analysts believe that activities such as
this keep some young people out of trouble. What other types of activities and training might be
useful in reducing youth-related violence in the community?
Separate students in to small groups and have students investigate the current programs in place
to deter youth from engaging in violence. Have these programs or initiatives been effective in
their communities? Why or why not? Next, have them develop a set of suggestions for
programs that might provide other opportunities for young people or activities that might help
youth make better life choices. What resources would be necessary to bring such programs into
being? How would the costs of these programs compare with the cost of processing people
through the justice system and following up with young offenders? Each group should prepare a
small report on their findings and share it with the rest of the class.
Focus on Theoretical Analysis
Based on Chapter One or other information you might wish to provide to students, have the class
decide on a social problem (such as youth violence) they would like to analyze during the next
class meeting. Set up four collaborative learning groups and determine which group will be the
“experts” on each of the major theoretical perspectives. Students should bring notes to turn in to
their note-taker on the following: (1) key factors involved in the theoretical perspective, (2) how
that approach might explain the social problem under consideration, (3) how that approach might
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
12
2. Collaborative Learning Groups: Students work in groups to fulfill a task. Each group
chooses a leader and someone to take notes, and the group presents a response or a paper
to the entire class. This requires flexibility in classroom space or having some other
location or time when students can confer with each other.
3. Analysis or reaction to videos: Before showing a video, prepare students with questions
or ideas on which to focus. After the video, ask them to answer the questions or write a
review or reaction, applying sociological concepts and perspectives. Have the students
present their ideas to the class.
4. Student debates: Having students prepare for and present debates on the social issues
discussed in the text and in class provides an outstanding opportunity to expose them to
more than one viewpoint. Students should be given advance assignments, suggested
resources, and a game plan for how to approach the debates so they can take a position,
gather data, and support their viewpoints.
Kathleen McKinney, Sociology, Illinois State University, Normal, Il, kmckinne@ilstu.edu
ACCESSING THE REAL WORLD: ACTIVE ENGAGEMENT WITH
PROBLEMS RELATED TO VIOLENCE
Focus on Community Action
Have a class discussion about prevention and intervention strategies for reducing youth violence
and gang participation in your community. Although people have initially laughed at ideas such
as midnight basketball, bowling, or dances, some social analysts believe that activities such as
this keep some young people out of trouble. What other types of activities and training might be
useful in reducing youth-related violence in the community?
Separate students in to small groups and have students investigate the current programs in place
to deter youth from engaging in violence. Have these programs or initiatives been effective in
their communities? Why or why not? Next, have them develop a set of suggestions for
programs that might provide other opportunities for young people or activities that might help
youth make better life choices. What resources would be necessary to bring such programs into
being? How would the costs of these programs compare with the cost of processing people
through the justice system and following up with young offenders? Each group should prepare a
small report on their findings and share it with the rest of the class.
Focus on Theoretical Analysis
Based on Chapter One or other information you might wish to provide to students, have the class
decide on a social problem (such as youth violence) they would like to analyze during the next
class meeting. Set up four collaborative learning groups and determine which group will be the
“experts” on each of the major theoretical perspectives. Students should bring notes to turn in to
their note-taker on the following: (1) key factors involved in the theoretical perspective, (2) how
that approach might explain the social problem under consideration, (3) how that approach might
Loading page 14...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
13
suggest resolving the problem, and (4) major strengths and weaknesses of the theoretical
perspective as applied to that problem.
Have students meet in their collaborative learning groups for about 20-30 minutes (depending on
the length of your class) to compile their notes and prepare a presentation for the entire class.
Then, ask group leaders to appoint other people in their group to do various aspects of the
presentation, so that other members do not become dependent on the leader doing most of the
group’s work and talking.
Focus on Media Engagement
Ask students to do a content analysis of television programs such as Saturday morning cartoons,
prime-time police and hospital shows, college and professional sporting events, and Internet
websites which are likely to depict violent acts. Also have students go to web sites such as Media
Watch (http://www.mediawatch.com) and Media Awareness Network (www.media-
awareness.ca) to get the latest “Television and Internet Statistics” on how many hours children
spend watching television and surfing the Internet and what perceptions they have about violence
in media. For example, a 2005 Canadian study found this in regard to children and Internet
usage:
• Almost one-third of the 50 favourite Web sites listed by kids incorporate material that is
violent (28 percent) or highly sexualized (32 percent). Kids in Grades 8 and 9 include these
sites in their list of favourites most frequently visited.
• Two sites that appear in the top four most popular sites with students in Grades 8 to 11 –
Newgrounds and eBaumsworld – contain mature content. These sites also appear on the list
of favourites for Grade 6 and 7 students.
Students should take note of the frequency of violent acts on television programs and the
Internet. As well, they should write about the gendered, racialized and class dimensions of each
violent act depicted. Were they surprised with their findings? Why or why not? Have students
bring their notes on what they observed on the television and Internet so they can share
information with the rest of the class.
APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH DISCUSSION
1. How can the sociological imagination help us as we deal with social problems that affect us
personally? What kinds of insights might advanced sociological training provide for a person
who wants to engage in problem solving in politics, government, education, the military, or
other social organizations and institutions?
2. Has Canada’s adoption of harsher penalties for people convicted of hate crimes had any
impact for victims or perpetrators? What, if any, impacts might these penalties have had so
far?
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
13
suggest resolving the problem, and (4) major strengths and weaknesses of the theoretical
perspective as applied to that problem.
Have students meet in their collaborative learning groups for about 20-30 minutes (depending on
the length of your class) to compile their notes and prepare a presentation for the entire class.
Then, ask group leaders to appoint other people in their group to do various aspects of the
presentation, so that other members do not become dependent on the leader doing most of the
group’s work and talking.
Focus on Media Engagement
Ask students to do a content analysis of television programs such as Saturday morning cartoons,
prime-time police and hospital shows, college and professional sporting events, and Internet
websites which are likely to depict violent acts. Also have students go to web sites such as Media
Watch (http://www.mediawatch.com) and Media Awareness Network (www.media-
awareness.ca) to get the latest “Television and Internet Statistics” on how many hours children
spend watching television and surfing the Internet and what perceptions they have about violence
in media. For example, a 2005 Canadian study found this in regard to children and Internet
usage:
• Almost one-third of the 50 favourite Web sites listed by kids incorporate material that is
violent (28 percent) or highly sexualized (32 percent). Kids in Grades 8 and 9 include these
sites in their list of favourites most frequently visited.
• Two sites that appear in the top four most popular sites with students in Grades 8 to 11 –
Newgrounds and eBaumsworld – contain mature content. These sites also appear on the list
of favourites for Grade 6 and 7 students.
Students should take note of the frequency of violent acts on television programs and the
Internet. As well, they should write about the gendered, racialized and class dimensions of each
violent act depicted. Were they surprised with their findings? Why or why not? Have students
bring their notes on what they observed on the television and Internet so they can share
information with the rest of the class.
APPLYING CRITICAL THINKING THROUGH DISCUSSION
1. How can the sociological imagination help us as we deal with social problems that affect us
personally? What kinds of insights might advanced sociological training provide for a person
who wants to engage in problem solving in politics, government, education, the military, or
other social organizations and institutions?
2. Has Canada’s adoption of harsher penalties for people convicted of hate crimes had any
impact for victims or perpetrators? What, if any, impacts might these penalties have had so
far?
Loading page 15...
Social Problems in a Diverse Society, 3Ce
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
14
3. Some critical-conflict theorists believe that social problems arise from the major
contradictions inherent in capitalist economies. What roles does violence play in a capitalist
economy?
4. How might labelling theory work with the concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy to increase
or decrease the life chances of a youth who is suspected of committing a deviant act?
5. Some feminist theorists suggest that the use of violence against women is one way that men
use to maintain and reinforce patriarchal oppression throughout society. Construct arguments
that support and/or refute this position.
6. Suppose that you were given the economic resources and political clout to reduce a major
social problem. Which problem would you choose? What steps would you take to alleviate
the problem? How would you measure your success or failure in reducing or eliminating the
problem?
7. Do governments at all levels in Canada listen to their constituents about social issues? What
evidence can you find to support that they do or do not? Why is the situation the way it is?
AUDIO-VISUAL MEDIA FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION
African Canadian Issues Collection—This 5-part collection of NFB titles illustrates that there is
a life beyond the streets for inner city youth. A gritty focus on the serious problems of poverty,
drug abuse, violence and street gangs. 2006. Varying clip lengths. National Film Board of
Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Charting New Waters: Responding to Violence against Women with Disabilities—This is a video
and a study guide about violence against women with disabilities. 1996. 38 mins. National Film
Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Cheating Death —This documentary tells the story of a young Toronto man and the little
understood world of guns, gangs and drugs. 2004. 24 mins. National Film Board of Canada,
www.nfb.ca.
Cultivating Peace in the 21st Century—The four films in Cultivating Peace in the 21st Century
provide teachers with tools to engage students to search for a “culture of peace” in our homes,
schools, neighbourhoods and global communities. 2002. 100 mins. National Film Board of
Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Exiles in Lotusland—This video is gritty look a the life of Canadian youth living on the edge,
suicide and “street kid” culture. 2005. 71 mins. National Film Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
It’s a Girl’s World—This film looks at bullying and social power in a clique of 10 year old girls.
2004. 54 mins. National Film Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Kendall/Nygaard/Thompson
14
3. Some critical-conflict theorists believe that social problems arise from the major
contradictions inherent in capitalist economies. What roles does violence play in a capitalist
economy?
4. How might labelling theory work with the concept of the self-fulfilling prophecy to increase
or decrease the life chances of a youth who is suspected of committing a deviant act?
5. Some feminist theorists suggest that the use of violence against women is one way that men
use to maintain and reinforce patriarchal oppression throughout society. Construct arguments
that support and/or refute this position.
6. Suppose that you were given the economic resources and political clout to reduce a major
social problem. Which problem would you choose? What steps would you take to alleviate
the problem? How would you measure your success or failure in reducing or eliminating the
problem?
7. Do governments at all levels in Canada listen to their constituents about social issues? What
evidence can you find to support that they do or do not? Why is the situation the way it is?
AUDIO-VISUAL MEDIA FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION
African Canadian Issues Collection—This 5-part collection of NFB titles illustrates that there is
a life beyond the streets for inner city youth. A gritty focus on the serious problems of poverty,
drug abuse, violence and street gangs. 2006. Varying clip lengths. National Film Board of
Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Charting New Waters: Responding to Violence against Women with Disabilities—This is a video
and a study guide about violence against women with disabilities. 1996. 38 mins. National Film
Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Cheating Death —This documentary tells the story of a young Toronto man and the little
understood world of guns, gangs and drugs. 2004. 24 mins. National Film Board of Canada,
www.nfb.ca.
Cultivating Peace in the 21st Century—The four films in Cultivating Peace in the 21st Century
provide teachers with tools to engage students to search for a “culture of peace” in our homes,
schools, neighbourhoods and global communities. 2002. 100 mins. National Film Board of
Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Exiles in Lotusland—This video is gritty look a the life of Canadian youth living on the edge,
suicide and “street kid” culture. 2005. 71 mins. National Film Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
It’s a Girl’s World—This film looks at bullying and social power in a clique of 10 year old girls.
2004. 54 mins. National Film Board of Canada, www.nfb.ca.
Loading page 16...
15 more pages available. Scroll down to load them.
Preview Mode
Sign in to access the full document!
100%
Study Now!
XY-Copilot AI
Unlimited Access
Secure Payment
Instant Access
24/7 Support
Document Chat
Document Details
Subject
Sociology